Comments by "Goose" (@goose7574) on "" video.

  1. Michelle Puerner That girl AND HER LITTLE SISTER (who was not an infant, but rather 2 years old), weren't still living in the house this happened in 2016, 2 years after the homicides). Their items were removed, when "they" went to live with another family. Not only that, but both girls, would've been entitled to both their parents social security, home funds (if their was any equity in the house), and life insurance, if there was any. If the home didn't have equity and there was no life insurance (very unlikely since the Father took care of the family financially, and usually when that's the case, at least, the providing parent will have life insurance, if not both, in case something were to ever happen), they still would've been entitled to their parents' social security.
    4