Comments by "Goose" (@goose7574) on "Lindsay Partin Trial Day 2 Part 1" video.

  1. #1. I don't believe they did a MRI #2. I believe that there CT scan actually did show that. The first doctor circled the two spots and talked about the contusions on the forehead and posterior part of the head. She just didn't put that it was major because when they are doing a CT Scan, and find swelling and bleeding inside the skull, those are what are urgent and need to be addressed.
    7
  2. The other thing that I think is crazy, is that the defense tries to say that "his" hired guy who did the autopsy said her death was caused from blunt force trauma to the back of the head. The babysitter says that she Fell and hit her head on a toy. Well, there's two conditions. Contusions on opposing sides (front and back) didn't break her skull nor crack it. Secondly the swelling and bleeding on brain was on the opposing side (frontal contusion- exterior bruise/swelling on forehead was on the left side). I find it odd that they didn't do a MRI after the surgery, but I'm guessing that they didn't need a more in depth picture, because at that point things were really bad and going downhill. A MRI would've been used for more detail from what I understand, but because it takes sometimes up to 45min to an hour, they opted for CT scans originally as the next best option because of the timing of a MRI.
    3
  3.  @bonniejosavland3227  What are you talking about? I never said I was smarter than anybody... I was simply helping answer questions someone had about the trial. There are comments you can't see anymore, from 3 years ago. That's what people do here on YouTube, they try to help answer questions. My answers have NOTHING to do with trying to "be a Doctor," or think I know more than the Doctor(s) did. You need to read things slower and try to comprehend them better...
    1