Comments by "" (@woahhbro2906) on "Ukraine Admits Heavy Losses in DONBAS" video.

  1. I knew something was up when that famous Canadian sniper came back home disappointed. I was also concerned that all that money our government sent to Ukraine wouldn't end up at the front line. Ukraine has historically had a corruption problem (and so do our politicians). My only question is though: What is taking Russia so long? I mean the US captured the Iraqi capital in a matter of weeks...Is the Russian military REALLY as strong as the world fears? I don't know. I do appreciate your videos because most of the Ukrainian news I consume tends to treat them as if they're on the verge of victory. I know the truth is somewhere in the middle. Why isn't the UN doing anything? It's all just frustrating.
    24
  2.  @Zoloder  the US occupied Afghanistan for that time. Russia can't even occupy their next door neighbor LOL
    2
  3.  @Sandro-ym8sf  I think the bot's script broke lol
    2
  4.  @digitalronin7787  the US only had 130,000 in Iraq. And the Iraqi military was the 3rd largest in the world at the time. Russia is supposed to be the #2 military in the world and they're having trouble fighting a conventional war with their next door neighbor (logistics shouldn't be an issue). I could understand if Russia was facing guerrilla insurgency like the US was, but they aren't. It just doesn't make sense for a #2 military.
    1
  5.  @digitalronin7787  and Russia has Chechens and Syrians helping them. Also, a TON of countries were helping Iraq. That's WHY they were called "insurgents" 😀
    1
  6.  @digitalronin7787  no, 130,000 Americans. Check that again.
    1
  7.  @digitalronin7787  Thanks for reminding me, the Russians are ALSO using Ukrainians as cannon fodder too. All those troops and countries helping them and they can't even achieve air dominance lol
    1
  8.  @bowieplysskin9280  that's what the Russian media would like you to believe. They're almost as bad as US media
    1
  9.  @bowieplysskin9280  the US achieved air superiority in 24 hours and captured the capital, along with the central government within weeks. Mopping up additional territory is normal. Russia is nearly 100 days into this conflict and they don't have air superiority or affected infrastructure or communications. They've also lost more high ranking generals in 100 days than the US has in 25 years. Also, Russian news pundits are frustrated, threatening nearly everyone with nuclear attacks. Not exactly actions of someone who has the situation under control...
    1
  10.  @digitalronin7787  it took three weeks to reach the capital of Iraq and 6 days to secure and capture it. Look it up.
    1
  11.  @Sandro-ym8sf  Yes, it's just Russia's smart planning to take it slowly. Like crossing a creek and losing an entire BTG while doing it. That kind of slowly?
    1
  12.  @Sandro-ym8sf  Russia SHOULD be in control of all of Ukraine by now being the "#2 military" in the world. They are literally next door. No country deliberately fights slowly, they don't have enough political capital.
    1
  13.  @Sandro-ym8sf  the US didn't invade Syria with its entire army like Russia is doing to Ukraine. You're also fighting a conventional war. The last time the US fought a conventional war, it literally lasted days. Russia is about to hit day 100. It should have captured Kyiv by now. Let me guess, it's all part of the plan, huh? Lol please...
    1
  14.  @digitalronin7787  Iraq had the 3rd largest military in the world. They weren't Afghanistan.
    1
  15.  @digitalronin7787  did you watch this video? The Ukrainians are literally fighting the Russians with WW1 weaponry.
    1
  16.  @digitalronin7787  Ukraine is using Maxim machine guns. From World War 1. Any weapons they received from the west are few and far between....again, all of this info is in this video you are commenting on. Why is Russia having such a hard time fighting an army which is using WW1 weaponry?
    1