Comments by "Robert Steele" (@robertsteele474) on "Extinction Rebellion: Causing Chaos For Climate Awareness w/Gail Bradbrook" video.

Ron Maimon "There is no scientific debate to be had." is not science. Neither is consensus opinion. "There is no space for debate, because this is a scientific fact." There is no such thing as "facts" in science, only useful conclusions derived from measurable data. You do not understand the basic principles of science. Nobody disputes that CO2 heats the air. It is a scientific observation that water vapor is a substantially more effective heater of the atmosphere. "There are no honest scientists who disagree with what I said." 3% of scientist in the actual report disagree. Are you claiming they are not honest. Why would they have been allowed to be included in the report. Cut the hyperbole; stick to facts. Do your research: read the research yourself:not just ones you agree with but opposing research with an open mind. The if you come to the same conclusion then your conclusion have more validation and not just be determined by analysis and not just hearsay and wishful thinking.
6
@rickobrien1583 Which scientists are you quoting?
1
@EnzoVecchiaio 3/4 of the earth surface is ocean. Farms, not so much, not even a significant "terrestrial" %. Pretty ineffective carbon store in them farms. The point is"facts" she chooses to use are specious and meaningless hyperbole, they just sound dire. Also, a bit disingenuous of you to parse "terrestrial". Apparently you expect just to consider Whales and Sharks are extra-terrestrial?
1
"but largely overlooked by climate alarmists." The studies I have seen track a number of these factors individually, or a selected few at a time, and ignoring the others, then attribute the remaining difference to man-made CO2. I have yet to see a study where they include the data all of these identified effects cumulatively combined. It seems like the data is cherry-picked to get the outcome desired.
1