Comments by "Robert Steele" (@robertsteele474) on "Jimmy's Message To TRUMP on Tucker Carlson's Show!" video.

@nuancedmilitarism8402 See...now that is actually funny. The old nuance is back there. I knew you had it in you.
3
Forgot one - Promoted by the Pharmaceutical industry via the Sackler family.
3
@nuancedmilitarism8402 What happened? Your black humor used to be funny with your ironic lack of nuance. Now you just sound dull. You have lost your edge.
2
@thomashovgaard3134 The same opium goes to the Pharmaceutical industry that promoted and distributed the opioids for that created the crisis.
2
@nuancedmilitarism8402 "we have been given the responsibility" Who specifically "gave it" to US...or was it our destiny manifest?
2
@nuancedmilitarism8402 Wow, the shark was jumped.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Nuanced Fonzarelli is a madman on skis.
1
apx. pegasus "What should I clarify next. 9/11?" Give it a shot. I am bored as shit in this lock-down. I could use a good laugh.
1
apx. pegasus Nice try Derp "Generally, opium derivatives can be broken down into two common groups- those which are directly from the plant such as morphine, codeine and heroin and those which are semi-synthetic such as Oxycodone, Hydrocodone and Hydromorphine which is also known as Dilaudid on the streets. Many drugs are synthesized from the raw versions of opiates. For instance, Vicodin and Demerol are actually derived from Morphine which comes raw from the opium poppy." Facts are actually better than bullshit Derp
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 Finally, the sarcasm reaches surface level! Whoever came up with this one deserves a raise.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 Um, the real truth is you are supposed to start a sentence with a capital letter. Hence "um, the real truth is that sometimes war is done for good reasons" is not very nuanced of you, grammatically speaking.
1
@russ4moose I think he is referring to this"" "Corporate attorney John Norton Pomeroy argued in the 1880s that "Statutes violating their prohibitions in dealing with corporations must necessarily infringe upon the rights of natural persons. In applying and enforcing these constitutional guaranties, corporations cannot be separated from the natural persons who compose them." " and this "In the 1886 case Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific – 118 U.S. 394 (1886), Chief Justice Waite of the Supreme Court orally directed the lawyers that the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause guarantees constitutional protections to corporations in addition to natural persons, and the oral argument should focus on other issues in the case.[13] In the Santa Clara case the court reporter, Bancroft Davis,[14] noted in the headnote to the opinion that the Chief Justice, Morrison Waite, began oral argument by stating, "The court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, applies to these corporations. We are all of the opinion that it does."[15] While the headnote is not part of the Court's opinion and thus not precedent, two years later, in Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining Co. v. Pennsylvania – 125 U.S. 181 (1888), the Court clearly affirmed the doctrine, holding, "Under the designation of 'person' there is no doubt that a private corporation is included [in the Fourteenth Amendment]. Such corporations are merely associations of individuals united for a special purpose and permitted to do business under a particular name and have a succession of members without dissolution."[16] This doctrine has been reaffirmed by the Court many times since.[
1
@lorenzoblum868 The USSR is no more. Hasn't been for over a generation now.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 "I think it was very irresponsible of her to have met with a murderer like Assad." your writer need to stop plagiarizing Rachel Maddow scripts, Hillary Clinton might sue you. Find a better hack writer, the MSM is full of them LOLOL
1
@zahrans Some of Rachel's more inept writers seem to have infiltrated nuanced militarism's writing pool. The nuance has been pretty uneven from post to post
1
David H Has anyone noticed how TDS was originally used to describe the stance people who were rabidly were against Trump and the MSM has recently flipped it to describe people who are allegedly rabidly for Trump. Funny how NEWSpeak works like that.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 You should send this hack writer back to Rachel Maddow. The quality of his writing is substandard.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 See, when you set your mind to it your absurdity and sarcasm really comes though. You just need a better editor.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 I agree, that policy worked in Vietnam and look at the failed state it has become. Oops.
1
@vir042 Yep, in the words of the prophet Elon the Great. "Deal with it"
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 I see you are as good with nuanced psychiatric diagnosis as you are with nuanced militarism.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 The sarcasm is almost there man,...almost there. You seem tired though. You should get some sleep, your grammar is getting atrocious. Your sentences are missing the correct capitalization, pronouns and some needed verbs.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 Whomever you had writing this for you needs to be fired for grammar alone. It is not even in the same "voice" as your more "nuanced" posts. Do better.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 The military does not direct foreign policy, they execute foreign policy though executive and congressional oversight and that is their sole role. Congressional and executive representation is supposed to be representative of the view of the nuances of their constituencies.
1
@nuancedmilitarism8402 Ahh..., the nuance is back. You are much better when you are writing your own material.
1