Comments by "Robert Steele" (@robertsteele474) on "" video.

  1.  michael piro  You are showing your age. There is no such thing as Civics class anymore. Hence...
    1
  2.  @Levixne  Yep, to let Zuckerberg, Page, Bezos, and Dorsey protect us from all opposing viewpoints viewed as too radical with their automated "algorithms".
    1
  3.  @PaulMcGillTV  "His supporting base isn't that large and has been diminishing" Actually (unfortunately) his popularity is increasing due to bogus Russia-gate investigations, Ukraine-gate impeachment hearings based on hearsay diverting attention from policies the DNC and Democrat party has no intention of supporting. "So exactly how can Trump beat Bernie?" For the DNC and Democrat party to continue business as usual.
    1
  4.  @PaulMcGillTV  They don't support a morally bankrupt man. They loathe the hypocrisy of an EQUALLY morally bankrupt political machine on a witch hunt to justify their losing an election to a game show host due to their own corruption, vanity and ineptitude. If the Democrats really wanted to get Trump on corruption, they would do it on the emoluments. They don't. This is just a show for the equally morally bankrupt Nancy Pelosi (the one who just made sure to extend the Patriot Act provision by including it in a :must pass" spending bill) to throw up her hands and say "We tried." If they tried him on the very real emoluments, they would more than likely get a conviction. But would be expose Adam Schiff's conflict of interest because the MILITARY aid Trump held up was Adam Schiff's donor Raytheon contract (Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Orbital ATK, Harris Corporation,being among others.) Since you are neither judge nor jury, you cannot say he is guilty of quid pro quo. That is for the Impeachment to decide. There has been no testimony or DIRECT evidence presented (so far) that Trump asked to intervene in a political election. The evidence that has been presented is (currently) all hearsay. Hearsay from a corrupt intelligence community and State Department that is supposed to ADVISE foreign policy to the commander in chief, not DIRECT it. Gordon Sondland, for example, admitted the the evidence he presented was all based on hearsay. The only thing Sondland stated that he ACTUALLY knew was Trump saying it was "not to be quid pro quo", but that he just wanted Ukraine to "do the right thing" regarding the corruption investigation. So stop with the TDS "orange bad man". Understand that ALL of these people are corrupt as hell and this is for show and will likely to backfire on the Democrat party as the Russia-gate investigation did. Don't believe ANY of these people. Pay attention to the facts and not just the words you want to hear. Get ALL these bums OUT by 2020.
    1