General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Robert Steele
The Hill
comments
Comments by "Robert Steele" (@robertsteele474) on "" video.
Neither party can be trusted with e-voting either since that ensures opaque cheating can easily be done.
2
Great solution. Make every Walmart a polling place. Shorter lines and keeps the riffraff oligarchs out since they would not be caught dead in a Walmart. ;-)
2
Mail Fraud = 20 years It is the law.
2
Cheat by e-machines is simpler. No physical evidence involved.
2
@soullesscornpop7412 I just read an article that says there is 3.5 million more registered voters than there are people in the United States. Bit of an exaggeration on your or the article's part or you didn't read very closely. What's True Estimates of voter rolls in the counties of some states, including California, tally more registered voters than eligible adults. What's False Such estimates do not encompass the entire U.S., are based on questionable methodologies, and may include voters who are listed on state rolls as "inactive." Also less that half the adults even make the effort vote. Long lines, short window of opportunity and no paid time off from work are probably one of the main reasons. Especially since they get nothing from either corrupt party sociopaths but promises anyway. That might be where the ELECTION fraud problem lays. More people having convenient access to voting means a small percentage of alleged dead people committing VOTER fraud are able to make a serious dent in swinging the election. Again, VOTER fraud is negligible. ELECTION fraud is the problem. More people voting make ELECTION fraud more difficult to cover up.
1
When is the last time you waited 7 hours in a checkout line? GTFOH ELECTION fraud is the problem (Who is doing the counting? Are the ballots counted accurately? Are the counts verifiable by physical ballots? Are voters unfairly being blocked from participating due to partisanship?) VOTER fraud (people forging ballots) is negligible (0.001% will never throw an election). Maximizing the turnout reduces the % of opportunity for individual voter fraud to affect anything, which is already negligible. VOTER ID is also a spurious concern as: The Post Office delivers ballots to a verified registered voter's address determined by the last tax return or drivers license or state ID. The registered voter fills out the paper ballot and mails it in a secured and prepaid through the Federal Postal service. You know the same way people used to always process their taxes in the olden times. Except they might actually want to vote instead of doing taxes. (Also remember that Mail fraud and theft is a very serious federal offense. Even for Mail Carriers. Try it yourself and I will talk to you again in 20 years). The paper ballot are then counted at the receiving area. In front of witnesses. Again not rocket science. Vote by mail is much more fair, secure and accountable than reduced polling places, long lines, unsecured and easily hackable, opaque, and unverifiable e-voting machines tallies. Of course gerrymandering still is a scam, but that is a separate issue.
1
:-)
1
No fraud in unverifiable black-box e-voting machines. Thank god we are all using them. LOL
1
When I was a kid people learned to count much higher than their fingers and toes. Even if they didn't, having more people counting would solve that problem pretty quickly with the benefit of more eyes on the press and less chance to rig it.
1
Long live the black hole of Matrix!
1
Guss Ruffee VOTER ID is a spurious concern as: The Post Office delivers ballots to a verified registered voter's address determined by the last tax return or drivers license or state ID. The registered voter fills out the paper ballot and mails it in a secured and prepaid through the Federal Postal service. You know the same way people used to always process their taxes in the olden times. Except they might actually want to vote instead of doing taxes. (Also remember that Mail fraud and theft is a very serious federal offense. Even for Mail Carriers. Try it yourself and I will talk to you again in 20 years). The paper ballot are then counted at the receiving area. In front of witnesses. Again not rocket science. Besides I don't see you as the type that really wants people on "government welfare" to vote.
1
Mail fraud is a federal offense. Easy to prosecute.
1
Happened before. A long time ago.
1
The opaque internet definitely would end up being the one party system. The Google/Alphabet/NSA party.
1
Nope. We can't forage for food, sh*t or f*ck in public. You know the good life. Our only social interaction is the internet. We are doomed. ;-)
1
The Post Office delivers ballots to a verified registered voters address determined by the last tax return or drivers license. The registered voter fills out the paper ballot and mails it in a secured and prepaid through the Federal Postal service. (Mail fraud is a very serious federal offense). You know the same way people used to always process their taxes in the olden times. Except they might actually want to vote instead of doing taxes. The paper ballot are then counted at the receiving area. In front of witnesses. Again not rocker science.
1
The Post Office delivers ballots to a verified registered voter's address determined by the last tax return or drivers license or state ID. The registered voter fills out the paper ballot and mails it in a secured and prepaid through the Federal Postal service. You know the same way people used to always process their taxes in the olden times. Except they might actually want to vote instead of doing taxes. (Also remember that Mail fraud and theft is a very serious federal offense. Even for Mail Carriers. Try it yourself and I will talk to you again in 20 years). The paper ballot are then counted at the receiving area. In front of witnesses. Again not rocket science.
1
@TaddiestMason I don't know if you are a rocket scientist or not, but you are talking too much sense. ;-)
1
@TaddiestMason I don't know if you are a rocket scientist or not, but you are talking too much sense. ;-)
1
What country?
1
e-machines are soooo much more reliable and not hackable at all.
1
"Especially if there is no USPS." You know that the USPS exists right? You know that not everything is AmazonPrimed right? And that even Amazon uses the USPS because it can handle the volume that Jeff Bezos can't?
1
By now you would think anyone as intelligent as you would know the difference between election fraud and voter fraud. Voter fraud is not the problem.
1
Not sure you have been here very long. ;-)
1
VOTER fraud (people forging ballots) is negligible (0.001% will never throw and election). ELECTION fraud is the problem (Who is doing the counting? Are the ballots counted accurately? Are the counts verifiable by physical ballots? Are voters unfairly being blocked from participating due to partisanship?) This is not rocket science.
1
I always trust technological solutions. It is always incorruptible and works for my best interest and I am not saying this just because the internet is spying on me. Because it isn't. My computer promised me. :-)
1
@user-vd2jk7dl3p "Think about how easy it would be for someone to tamper with the votes or fill out other people's ballots or steal someone's ballot and turn it in for them" ELECTION fraud is the problem (Who is doing the counting? Are the ballots counted accurately? Are the counts verifiable by physical ballots? Are voters unfairly being blocked from participating due to partisanship?) VOTER fraud (people forging ballots) is negligible (0.001% will never throw an election). Maximizing the turnout reduces the % of opportunity for individual voter fraud to affect anything, which is already negligible. VOTER ID is also a spurious concern as: The Post Office delivers ballots to a verified registered voter's address determined by the last tax return or drivers license or state ID. The registered voter fills out the paper ballot and mails it in a secured and prepaid through the Federal Postal service. You know the same way people used to always process their taxes in the olden times. Except they might actually want to vote instead of doing taxes. (Also remember that Mail fraud and theft is a very serious federal offense. Even for Mail Carriers. Try it yourself and I will talk to you again in 20 years). The paper ballot are then counted at the receiving area. In front of witnesses. Again not rocket science. Vote by mail is much more fair, secure and accountable than reduced polling places, long lines, unsecured and easily hackable, opaque, and unverifiable e-voting machines tallies. Of course gerrymandering still is a scam, but that is a separate issue.
1
ELECTION fraud is the problem (Who is doing the counting? Are the ballots counted accurately? Are the counts verifiable by physical ballots? Are voters unfairly being blocked from participating due to partisanship?) VOTER fraud (people forging ballots) is negligible (0.001% will never throw an election). Maximizing the turnout reduces the % of opportunity for individual voter fraud to affect anything, which is already negligible. VOTER ID is also a spurious concern as: The Post Office delivers ballots to a verified registered voter's address determined by the last tax return or drivers license or state ID. The registered voter fills out the paper ballot and mails it in a secured and prepaid through the Federal Postal service. You know the same way people used to always process their taxes in the olden times. Except they might actually want to vote instead of doing taxes. (Also remember that Mail fraud and theft is a very serious federal offense. Even for Mail Carriers. Try it yourself and I will talk to you again in 20 years). The paper ballot are then counted at the receiving area. In front of witnesses. Again not rocket science. Vote by mail is much more fair, secure and accountable than reduced polling places, long lines, unsecured and easily hackable, opaque, and unverifiable e-voting machines tallies. Of course gerrymandering still is a scam, but that is a separate issue.
1