Comments by "" (@DanielSMatthews) on "UN warns that the 'climate time bomb' is ticking" video.

  1. The people behind the UN Climate prognostications are pathalogical liars! There is no solid science to support their claims, in fact recent data in the Keeling Curve data set suggest that that they can't even directly correlate human activities with the rate of CO2 level rise in the atmosphere, and that is aside from the fact that they can't prove their greenhouse hypothesis at all. People don't realise that it is not an actual formal scientific theory at all.
    2
  2.  @Aaronwhatnow  You have already been told about this and when challenged to explain it you "ran away". The UN recognise two datasets that are said to interact, the Keeling Curve and an index of global economic activity. i.e. They declared a drop in human economic activity due to COVID yet that magnitude of that does not show up as a proportional signal in the Keeling curve dataset therefore the assumption that there is a direct correlation between human activity and the change in the rate of CO2 rise in Earth's atmosphere cannot be substantiated. The data does not support the hypothesis. Go and look for yourself, get the free Maxima computer algebra system and the Wavelet package for it then do an wavelet analysis, see if you can find the signal yourself. Also don't be a complete clown and claim that the missing 10% drop in CO2 production is "lost in the noise," because that data is measured with an accuracy in parts per million and 10% is 1 part in 10, many orders of magnitude higher than what is detectable. Not that you have the IQ to do the above, but whatever, go and ask an "adult" to help you.
    2
  3. The people behind the UN Climate prognostications are pathalogical liars! There is no solid science to support their claims, in fact recent data in the Keeling Curve data set suggest that that they can't even directly correlate human activities with the rate of CO2 level rise in the atmosphere, and that is aside from the fact that they can't prove their greenhouse hypothesis at all. People don't realise that it is not an actual formal scientific theory at all.
    1