Comments by "" (@DanielSMatthews) on "‘Committed to saying no: Albanese on Coalition's ‘denial’ of climate change" video.

I am committed to knowing what the science and data really demonstrates, and that is far less concerning and less clear cut than the claims of hysterical fools such as Albo who wish to inflict their psychologically abusive climate alarmism on everyone. Can humans change the climate in a positive or negative way that is significant, no, and Australia alone has far less influence. In fact recent data in the Keeling Curve data set suggests that they can't even directly correlate human activities with the rate of CO2 level rise in the atmosphere, and that is aside from the fact that they can't prove their greenhouse hypothesis at all. People don't realise that it is not an actual formal scientific theory at all. The UN recognises two datasets that are said to interact, the Keeling Curve and an index of global economic activity. i.e. They declared a drop in human economic activity due to COVID yet that magnitude of that does not show up as a proportional signal in the Keeling curve dataset therefore the assumption that there is a direct correlation between human activity and the change in the rate of CO2 rise in Earth's atmosphere cannot be substantiated. The data does not support the hypothesis. Go and look for yourself, get the free Maxima computer algebra system and the Wavelet package for it then do a wavelet analysis, see if you can find the signal yourself. Also don't be a complete clown and claim that the missing 10% drop in CO2 production is "lost in the noise," because that data is measured with an accuracy in parts per million and 10% is 1 part in 10, many orders of magnitude higher than what is detectable.
3
@Millennialtomb I had that POS muted but LOL, yeah look at the crap they wrote, it doesn't make any sense at all when you read my comment, and their little b-buddy is even dumber, what a pair of knuckleheads.
2