Comments by "" (@timogul) on "Voice of America"
channel.
-
25
-
10
-
8
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@mattm402 Well, a few reasons. 1. there was no need for it. It was assumed by most that Roe would remain in place. It was only Republicans fighting to change that. 2. Democrats have rarely had a filibuster proof majority, and even when they did, it was razor thin, and at least a few of those Democrats are anti-choice. While you could look at raw numbers and pretend that they "had the numbers," in reality, they never did. If, on the other hand, the congress accurately reflected the will of the American people, there would be more Democrats, and they would have had the votes for it.
But again, until this week, it was not necessary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ It does not matter what Putin's demands were, he still had no right to get them. He can ASK, and he can offer peaceful incentives, like trade negotiations, but at no point does him having desires justify an invasion if he does not get what he wants. How is this so hard to understand? Also, there were already Soviet military bases in Cuba before and after the missile crisis, yet the US never invaded. Their red line was nukes, and only nukes, and there was never any talk of returning Ukraine's nukes.
To your second point, if you are talking about Ukrainians living in eastern Ukraine, no, Ukraine never shelled them, except for active separatist military forces. If you take up arms against the government, they have the right to respond, right?
1
-
1
-
1