Comments by "" (@timogul) on "WPLG Local 10" channel.

  1.  @nunyabizznus2216  Yup, which can include lying to people about where they are going to what the circumstances are, which is what DeSantis did.
    1
  2.  @lisas1175  No, because that was a legal governmental action. What DeSantis did was a purely political stunt with no backing in law. There are no state or federal laws that authorize governors to transport migrants across state lines, there are plenty that allow the federal government to do so.
    1
  3.  @lisas1175  Don't watch CNN. Why do you think that I do?
    1
  4.  @lisas1175  Not according to the actual migrants. Many claim they were being told that they were going to Boston, or they were offered compensation for travel that they never received. You should look deeper into this story, you've apparently missed a lot of it.
    1
  5.  @roxannebarton9740  I didn't speak of any networks, other than Fox. Did you know that Fox News viewers are actually LESS informed about the world than people who receive no news at all?
    1
  6.  @lisas1175  It's impossible to close a border of our size completely, but the current border crossings are no different than they were under Trump. Everyone who tries to enter is apprehended and processed. If they have a valid asylum claim, then that is considered, and if they do not, then they are deported. What is the problem that you need solved here?
    1
  7.  @roxannebarton9740  Who's word are you taking for that, the kidnappers, or the victims?
    1
  8.  @roxannebarton9740  no, again, they have done studies. Fox News viewers know LESS than people who have no news at all. That's not a guess, it's a fact.
    1
  9.  @roxannebarton9740  Is that something they tell you exists on Faux News?
    1
  10.  @roxannebarton9740  Considerng that the actual studies show that Fox News is likely to leave you less informed about the world than when you started, I'm afraid I'll have to take anything you believe to be "facts" with a grain of salt.
    1
  11.  @scottallen7212  It's amazing once you can learn about the world around you once you break your mind free from Faux News echo chambers.
    1
  12.  @jonathanzuniga1844  Yeah, thye probably won't like you.
    1
  13.  @phillycheezcake5571  If you restrict yourself to only your personal experiences, then you can only ever know less than 0.001% of the world around you. That is a deliberately ignorant way to live. Don't take any specific source at face value without checking it against multiple other reliable sources, but also do not dismiss credible sources just because they conflict with your feelings on the matter.
    1
  14.  @phillycheezcake5571  The inflation is certainly real, it's an obvious consequence of various world events. It's just a lot worse elsewhere, and there's nothing that could have prevented the underlying causes of it. As for crime, there certainly is a lot more reporting of crime lately, there just isn't as much actually happening. I understand that you want to find ways to continue believing what you want to be true, in spite of what actually is true, but it's just not healthy.
    1
  15.  @phillycheezcake5571  Well, what it means is context. It would have been impossible to have zero inflation, when prices are going up around the world. That's just how economics are. The best we can do is mitigate those effects, which they have done. It would have been much worse under the previous administration. You can't look at five years ago and say "why are things different now than then," as if life hasn't happened in between. It would be like someone in 1932 looking back at how things were better in 1928, and then blaming Roosevelt for that. And I have no single source, nobody should. My stats come from a wide variety of sources, something difficult to post on Youtube, because Youtube. But you owe it to yourself to ALSO find better sources than whatever it is you've been using so far.
    1
  16.  @larryredecker6612  If you believe that, then maybe you should become better informed?
    1
  17.  @kskeel1124  Yes, many of them.
    1
  18.  @kskeel1124  The opposite, actually. The previous administration was riding on Obama's coattails, until they broke it. Then the current administration had to get things back into shape.
    1
  19.  @ShizawnSanders  No, I'm just better informed than you. You can fix that.
    1
  20.  @DimitriosChannel  Yup, bots be clicking.
    1
  21.  @Percival-kl9yy  Oh, no, I'm not maga.
    1
  22.  @johncampbell5333  Immigrants are spread all over the country. Were you not aware of this? Plenty of immigrants take advantage of sanctuary cities and states that are not directly on the border. I get that you want them to be as morally bankrupt as Texas and Florida and for their offer of sanctuary to be hollow, but that just wouldn't be the truth.
    1
  23.  @chucksgrace3225  If they can find a place to put them, sure. I mean they can't exactly shack up in people's houses, the space in question would need to be a public space that was set aside for migrants, like the billions of dollars worth of such federal facilities in Texas and Florida.
    1
  24. And I'm sure you are a disappointment to him as well.
    1
  25. Trump is more of a Dooku.
    1
  26.  @fanboyhex1555  I don't think he's actually MAGA. He seems on the right side of things.
    1
  27. Yup, "towards the criminals."
    1
  28.  @tjwallis7948  It is true. If people are doing crimes, those crimes are being investigated. If people are not doing crimes, then they are not being investigated. I know Trump hasn't been indicted yet, but he will be, don't worry.
    1
  29.  @sd5371  They would cause less harm to kids than anyone picked by De Santis. Let the voters decide whether to remove them and who to replace them with.
    1
  30. Yup. "Not at all."
    1
  31.  @roxannebarton9740  "Tyranny begins where rule of law ends." Trying to get political opponents locked up for crimes they did not commit is the definition of tyranny.
    1
  32.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  There are fewer conflicts under the current administration than there were under the former one.
    1
  33.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  We are. As is the Biden administration. They provide the best chance of reducing both current and future wars. It's disingenuous or foolish to claim otherwise.
    1
  34.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  The facts don't care about your feelings.
    1
  35.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  No, the fact would be that Biden is the more peaceful choice.
    1
  36.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  I'm not a Faux News viewer, so I live in the real world instead.
    1
  37.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  My argument is that the data backs up the position that there were more wars started during the previous administration than under the current one, and that a lot of the conflict during the current administration can be traced back to mistakes made by the previous one.
    1
  38.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  Are you talking about how Trump let the Taliban leader out of prison and told him that he could have the country back in 2021? That country?
    1
  39.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  It was relatively stable before he did that, but yes, he did set them back over a decade of progress, like he threatens to do to the US.
    1
  40.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  Oh, ok. There was no such thing. I guess that's all there is to say, really.
    1
  41.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  Afghanistan was improving slowly but steadily, and would have continued to do so if the US had continued providing a minimal level of support. The decision to release the Taliban leader and turn the country over to him doomed them and wasted every penny the US had spent to that point. That's the reality of the situation.
    1
  42.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  I think you've been misinformed. Afghanistan was improving, life for the average person was massively better than it had been before 2001. The Taliban certainly hadn't changed their minds, but they were contained to the fringes of the territory by US military support. That state could have continued indefinitely if not for 🍊's promise that they could have the country back. Societal change is a generational thing, it can't happen overnight. You need to hold a stable situation long enough for people to grow up in that world and become adults, and for the people who believed in the old ways to become too old to fight about it anymore. Also, there was no $81B lost anywhere. Why do you keep saying that?
    1
  43.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  Again, it is a FACT that millions of Afghan people adopted more American lives while we kept the Taliban away from them. The fact that they were unwilling to die to defend that way of life does not mean that things did not change. Given a few more decades, they would not have had to spend their lives to fight the Taliban, because the Taliban would have eaten themselves up.
    1
  44.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  Oh, are you talking about our military surplus junk that we couldn't be bothered to pick up? That was not a problem. We got all the important hardware out of there well before the withdrawal. They could keep the rest for all it mattered.
    1
  45.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  As I said, generational change takes literal generations to take place. You can't make such changes over night, you need to have entire generations of kids raised in that new reality. And nobody wanted the junk we left behind. It's standard practice when we leave a country that we've built a significant presence in. It is not a problem. Why are you crying about it like it is?
    1
  46.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  Well, again, by the end, US lives lost were extremely few. The US troops in the region were mainly just support for the Afghan troops that did most of the actual fighting by that point. They just didn't have faith that they could hold without that ongoing American support. The benefits of doing so outweighed the cost to America. We lost fewer troops in Afghanistan in total than we would lose in a single day in Vietnam, this is just a much weaker generation than those that came before.
    1
  47. That's Marvel, different branch of Disney.
    1
  48.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  I doubt that would apply in this case. It would find nothing of value.
    1
  49.  @IreneCampos-tk2vd  I'm sorry that I don't buy into your headcanon.
    1