Comments by "" (@timogul) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1.  @SC-pe9ir  Ok, so what's one location in San Fransisco that you believe should be turned over to homeless encampments?
    1
  2. Fort Derrick says "new phone, who dis?" Apparently there is no Fort Derrick.
    1
  3. "Red states are good for businesses." . . . until you exercise your free speech rights.
    1
  4.  @hahmed1178  Why do you believe that it's "clearly a bioweapon?"
    1
  5.  @GoGo-cr4mo  I don't think that idiots should need to be bribed into protecting themselves and their neighbors.
    1
  6.  @davidking4779  Don't worry, we voted out Trump, so there's no chance of them taking away the vote nationwide. There are a lot fo states at risk though, which is why it's important to pass the For the People act to prevent that.
    1
  7.  @davidking4779  No, those people already don't vote, so they are a non-issue. The new Republican bills are designed to take the votes away from people in Democratic-leaning areas so that Republicans can win elections even if a minority of Americans agree with them. The For the People act is meant to prevent that.
    1
  8.  @davidking4779  Unless they have difficult acquiring that ID. More importantly, NOT requiring voter ID is not allowing any significant amount of people to vote illegally, so why bother with it? I mean, if having voter ID prevents even 100 legal voters from voting, but only prevents 2-3 illegal voters from voting, then do you think that was worth doing? But the voter ID portion is not the problem with the new Republican voter suppression laws anyway.
    1
  9.  @davidking4779  The Republican laws are not about suppressing illegal voting, they are about suppressing legal voting, because in the last election Americans legally voted to remove the Republican presidential candidate and they did not like that. The new rules are designed to reduce voting in traditionally Democratic parts of states, and to allow Republican officials in states to overturn election results that displease them. Illegal voting is not a problem in the US, it never has been. The conservative Heritage Foundation tracks voter fraud in the US and over the past twenty years had been able to find almost none, certainly not enough to change the results of any election. There will always be some people who want to commit crimes, but at a certain point, the attempts to prevent a crime cause more harm than the crime itself. Like you could prevent theft by preemptively jailing ALL citizens, but would that be worth it? As I said, if there is practically no voter fraud already, would reducing that to zero be worth it if it means that ten or a hundred or a thousand times as many perfectly legal voters find themselves unable to exercise that right due to the new restrictions on how and when they are able to do so?
    1
  10. Why would they move from one shithole state to another? If they are going to build another park, it should be in a better state.
    1
  11.  @blakethegreatone2058  But those government taxes go to pay for things that need to take place to have a functional society. I mean, Walmart would not exist without the government paying to keep their workers alive. Any "hard working small business owner" would not have a functioning business if not for millions of dollars in government support that allowed that to happen, whether he's aware of that or not. So somebody has to pay for that, and it only makes sense for people to pay that cost based on their ability to afford it. Those who are the furthest from lacking the basic needs to survive should carry the heavier burden.
    1
  12.  @blakethegreatone2058  Well, if that's how you prefer to live, you can move to a country like Somalia, where they don't pay such fees. You don't deserve to take advantage of the benefits of living in America without paying your fair share though.
    1
  13.  @blakethegreatone2058  Are you saying that you would be fine with Americans living like that? What is Putin paying you to say things like that, because no American could believe such a thing.
    1
  14.  @m.a.r.1125  No, your chances of making 100K a year would go up, because you would have more customers that were able to pay into however you make your salary. Improving the lives of the lower and middle class cause the economy as a whole to rise with it.
    1
  15.  @blakethegreatone2058  I'm sorry, I thought that when I was talking about the bare necessities, that you were mature and intelligent enough to understand what I meant without having to "explain it like you're five." But you made clear this was not the case, so I elaborated. Ask stupid questions, get stupid answers. Again, if you don't want to pay your fair share into building America into the country it is today, then you are not entitled to the advantages of living here. If you want to live in a place where there are no taxes, then move to a country that has no taxes. It's not difficult.
    1
  16.  @blakethegreatone2058  The only difference between us is that you're too ignorant to realize how reliant on government you are. You take it for granted that you have roads to drive on, that the people you interact with have a basic education, that the medical system does not collapse for lack of funding. Being reliant on government funding has nothing to do with being lazy, most people reliant on government funding work harder than you do and always have. You're just too ignorant to understand that. you also do not understand how authoritarianism works. It is not, nor has it ever been, an elected government making rules for the people to follow. That is not authoritarian. Authoritarianism is when UNelected people insist that they should have their way in spite of what the people want, and attempt to seize power anyway. The funny thing is, it's the authoritarians that have convinced their idiot followers that it's democracy that's the authoritarian ones, because their followers are just that dumb.
    1
  17.  @aaronthenorm5400  Santa Claus.
    1
  18.  @Sporxz  That's an easy one, "MAGA."
    1
  19.  @fightfish3265  Hey, maybe you know, I can't figure that out, when did anyone elect Hunter Biden? Why do so many people indoctrinated on Faux News seem obsessed with the guy?
    1
  20.  @pacifickaihomesllc3605  MOST celebrities used in beer commercials have teen followers, that can't be a reasonable bar for it.
    1
  21. @Carterb92 That isn't accurate, she does identify as a woman.
    1
  22.  @trapiconti4001  What mental problems do you believe Mulvaney has? I can't find any evidence of her having any established mental conditions, at least, no more than most people who appear in beer advertisements.
    1
  23. This is a great opportunity to cut loose some of the weakest links. Good riddance. Don't need you.
    1
  24. Never underestimate the bigotry of the average Bud Light drinker.
    1
  25. they did read the legislation, that's how they know that they'll win their lawsuit. The government isn't allowed to directly target laws at specific companies or individuals.
    1
  26.  @g-foxgaming5710  That's not how the law works.
    1
  27.  @g-foxgaming5710  Most parents aren't under that impression. Only the crazy idiots are under that impression. Most parents know that it's the Republican party that is about grooming children.
    1
  28.  @ethicsfirst3388  It's not "guilt by association," it's "a sign of a complete lack of solid judgement." If someone has chosen to work for Donald Trump, then that is a sign that they completely lack both ethics and intelligence. Why would you listen to anyone lacking in both of those traits?
    1
  29.  @ethicsfirst3388  That's not what "guilt by association" means." "Guilt by association" means that you hold someone accountable merely for being related or near someone who did wrong, say holding a father accountable because his son did a crime, or holding someone accountable for a crime their friend did, when they had no idea that their friend was doing that crime. This is NOT "guilt by association." This is holding people accountable for the choices THEY made, the decision THEY took to work for Donald Trump, which reflects poorly on THEM because THEY made that choice KNOWINGLY. That is not "guilt by association," that is just GUILT. IF you had any ethics, you would recognize that.
    1
  30.  @ethicsfirst3388  Well look, if someone is just a grunt-level worker in a Trump-related company, I do not judge them for that. Work is work, and working at a Trump hotel is no different than working at any other hotel. And if someone is a career civil servant who just happened to work in government during the Trump administration, I don't judge that either, civil servants don't get to choose their boss. But anyone directly appointed by Trump, anyone who directly set out to work under him after he ran for President? They are responsible for making that choice. A person of sound mind and good conscience could not have made that choice. Ethics is taking responsibility for ones actions. Preaching that people should not be held accountable for their actions is no form of ethics. No side can claim to be ethical while condoning the platform or actions of Donald Trump.
    1
  31.  @megabuster3940  I don't call people bigots to help my argument, my argument stands on its own merits. I call them bigots because that is the accurate term to describe their behavior. It's no different than calling someone a "doctor" for performing surgery. And I do understand why they did not appreciate this stunt, Bud tried to do an ad campaign using a trans influencer, and bigots are triggered whenever a trans person is visible to them, like a cartoon bull seeing a red cloth. And yet trans people exist, so society can't just tiptoe around that fact to avoid triggering bigots. The responsibility is on the bigots to just stop getting triggered when they see trans people. If they weren't getting upset at the mere presence of a trans person in advertising, then they would not be bigots (well, they could still be bigots, just for different reasons).
    1
  32.  @taags  Well, it is a fact that people who get their news from Fox News are actually LESS informed about the world than people who watch no news at all. They create their own little echo bubbles in which everything they want to believe happens to be true, and everything they'd rather not believe is just "misinformation from the leftstream media." Of course, reality just keeps on moving without them.
    1
  33.  @jamesgoode9246  I do not see a comment from you directed toward Thundersub. Perhaps Youtube removed it for content reasons?
    1
  34.  @Vaul.  Yup, it's not surprising that bigots are rude people, it's sort of expected.
    1
  35.  sambankman-zelensky9691  Nothing. You dig your own graves. It's not our responsibility to help.
    1
  36.  sambankman-zelensky9691  No, that would be the worst thing for you. That is what you want, but not what you need.
    1
  37.  sambankman-zelensky9691  I'm afraid not.
    1
  38.  sambankman-zelensky9691  I don't need any help to do what you want me to do. You are bad at understanding how to be helpful.
    1
  39.  @larry6601  No, Disney's success had nothing to do with having "special privileges." That's a lie that was told to you by the Faux News to keep you compliant. Look into it.
    1
  40.  @gunslinger2566  This isn't about DeSantis going after the groomers in the GoP though, this is about him going after Disney, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the GoP groomers. So why are you bringing the GoP groomers into this?
    1
  41.  @jimbeam2705  It's all well and good that you don't like Groomers, so vote DeSantis and the other GoP groomers out of office. That has nothing to do with Disney though. They oppose the GoP groomers.
    1
  42. $0, they just reported on the accurate situation.
    1
  43.  @odin.8048  No, they get paid to find out the facts and report them, whatever they might be.
    1
  44.  @odin.8048  How much do you get paid to say that?
    1
  45.  @odin.8048  Not interested. Whoever's currently paying the bills, they over-spent, because this is lazy even by Russian social media shill standards.
    1
  46. Biden's been handling his responsibilities and duties exceptionally well. What nonsense world are you living in?
    1
  47. And Jesus prays for the rest of you to catch up to the hold-out.
    1
  48. This has been needed for a long time. The alternative is just companies rushing to the cheapest tax shelters and hoarding all the money for their own benefit.
    1
  49.  @Halal_Dan  If we do that then the companies just get richer and richer and everyone else just gets poorer and poorer. That would be foolish.
    1
  50.  @toom8rs15  People should work in their own best interests and companies should too, but it's the people's best interests to limit corporations so that the overall system works in the people's best interests. It's like having a sports league, obviously each team wants to do their best to win all the time, but if any one team structures things in a way that no other team can compete then that just results in a boring game for everyone, so the league tries to set up rules so that all the teams are at least somewhat competitive. Similarly, in business, each company will try to set things up in a way that they make the most money and pay out the least, but it's the role of government to ensure that they pay back their fair share to society, and to stay on an even playing field with others.
    1