Comments by "" (@timogul) on "12 News"
channel.
-
35
-
16
-
12
-
7
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gorillazilla4534 No, they testified to vague suspicions that chain of custody might have been at issue. Republicans tend to do that a lot, making hearsay argument about how they saw someone who might have been "up to no good," without any evidence whatsoever that they actually did anything illegal, and acting as if it's proof of anything. There was no actual evidence, including testimony, that chain of custody had been broken, and sworn testimony by the election officials that it had not been.
Also, there were no problems with the paper strips in the voting machines, at least none that impacted the outcome. The issues you discussed did not prevent votes being cast, it only prevented them being read in at the polling place. They were securely stored though and counted later, essentially the same process as drop boxes. There is no evidence that anyone who attempted to cast a ballot was unable to do so, or that their vote was not counted.
And of course I'm fine with the candidate running for office overseeing the elections, since that happens in MOST elections involving the re-election of a State's Attorney or whatever the equivalent role it. So long as they can be trusted to do their job professionally, as in this case, there's no reason for concern. The only concern would be if the person in question was an election-denier conspiracy theorist, as were many Republican candidates in this election cycle.
Hey, look, you just say what Faux News tells you to think, right down to the "independent thinker" bit. You aren't brainwashed, you're just an "independent thinker," who just happens to think the same as every other Faux News drone. It's like the new "goth kids."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1