General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Far Centrist
ABC News
comments
Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "ABC News" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
the downside is that nobody can hear you scream.
43
@Lolonilola interesting how they are simply calling you bots to discredit you without explaining how your statement is wrong. I guess deep down they know their side is losing and lost an ability to reason.
7
Karma
4
black belt judo vs cracc addict is a very interesting fight indeed
3
not this again. how many times has it? yet all that happens is the wagner keep gaining grounds this is a personal feud, no need to blow it out of proportion. especially considering this has happened more than twice.
2
150k? That's pure projection. Do you mean ukraine?
2
the austrian painter approves!
1
@accutronitisthe2nd95 the jet didn't fall out of the sky. The reaper drones did and is now scraps. It's not equal at all because the damage to the flanker is repairable, if any.
1
@TotalEclipse856 i haven't heard about that, but if it's true, they still hold more than 90% of bakhmut
1
@TotalEclipse856 last i checked the ukranian now only controlled around 7.5% of bakhmut. if my math is correct that is more than 90%
1
@theEWDSDS why would russia repair the supply lines in it? russia is in the east, not west. the supply line is secure, the fact that they can supply their troops with thousands of munition each day is enough proof. the supply lines which is a rail track extend to the west, as well as the "road of life" for ukrane. russia is in the east where the supply line is wide open, they are not using either path so i don't know what you're even trying to say. now this narrative of "russia has lost a lot of men" and "bakhmut is strategically irrelevant" has both been debunked. there has never been any proof or explanation for the 200k casualty number (wagner alone only has 6k active soldier in bakhmut, how did they lose 100k according to kirby is a mystery) meanwhile zelensky himself has pointed out the strategic significance of bakhmut, how it opens the way to the rest of ukrane if captured. why do you think they are defending it if it wasn't important?
1
@Mutrunalle I don't cheer for anybody. This isn't a football match kid. Get a life.
1
a photo of patriot missile is claimed to be ruz missiles. an iron cross on the tank is ignored. good job ABC
1
@pliniojr95 they lose much less, they have much bigger pool of young men to draw from and only drawn a small percentage of that. It will have a tiny impact on the demographics especially when it lose (while it's still a big number) it's incomparable to the massive number afu lose that they are resorting to taking every men off the street.
1
@pliniojr95 your point is the damage to the demographics on both sides, i'm just saying it affects ukr much more while ru only affected a bit. if you want to change the angle to that of sentiment, then i do not disagree with you, but that doesn't mean that what i said is factually wrong.
1
@jojolafrite90 the guy in the comment above pointed out how the flanker is 30 million and the reaper is 32 million. And the 30 million one did not fall out of the sky, probably just some minor damage.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All