Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "What will Russia gain or lose if Belarus joins its war?" video.

@rubenvasquez8750 russia manage to defend itself in ww1, and marched into berlin and saved europe from a certain ideology singlehandedly in ww2. Russia is the first to reach space. Look at russian economy now and tell me it's going to collapse like they did for the last 9 months. Meanwhile europe is dying from stupidity. How's the Christmas tree? Probably dark lol
1
@owlie373 an empire collapse gave way to the Bolsheviks. It did not cause the whole nation to collapse. The same thing can be said here, without the soviet participations the west wouldn't be able to turn the tide, neither would the US participate with its isolationist policy. And at the end of the day, it's russians that made it to berlin. Again, the same can be said here. it's the russian that prevented the german from getting into the Caucasus oil fields. Italy performed very poorly, it's not that powerful. And the only reason japan fell is because they used the forbidden weapon. The US did give some limited weapon to the soviet through its lend lease but it's very limited. The russian tank and weapons seen on the battlefield are russian made. The US built all soviet factories? That's pure fantasy, clown.
1
@DrCruel FYI russia has captured marinka, andreevka, and close to capturing soledar (it may have already been). Bakhmut is encircled and under constant shelling while russia just sit back, relax, and fire the artillery/mortars, leading to numerous casualties in ukr side. Ever wonder why the zaporozhye offensive has not materialized? They are pouring everything into bakhmut.
1
@DrCruel why force it to fall when the ukranian gracefully provided russia with constant artillery target with zero efforts? Actually getting the place to fall will only push the ukranian to a more defensible position. Russia doesn't care about western optics, it's doing very well on its own and proceeds at its own pace. That thousands of dead conscripts in bakhmut would not be easy to hide for long. 30+ of the most powerful nations provided aid, meanwhile the ukranian is advancing backwards 🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@DrCruel everything you said is wrong. War isn't all about territory, you can't win war by claiming everywhere and have the troops stretch thin and decrease by a batallion every 10 days (ukr admission). The only one who puts conscripts in war is ukr, who's on it's 7th round of conscription by now, and is now bringing in women into battle (look up about the news of ukr clothing factory working 24/7 to provide army clothes to women). This is not the case for russia who until now had only mobilized once. You need to learn more about the difference between mobilization and conscription then come back here. Even zaluzhny himself said that russian mobilization has been very successful and he's the ukr commander in chief. Territory stalemate does not equate to a stalemate in losses. Look up the news about kherson hospital being full and the doctors working 24/7, look up also about the news of wounded troops being moved to kiev due to the lack of hospital beds. You never provided any sources for your wild claims.
1
@emericdion i can show you an official direct frontline reports from bakhmut as well as videos on telegram if you want. Conscripts? Russia don't use conscripts. Are you referring to ukrane?
1
@emericdion it's not one video. There's one video of frontline reports, as well as abundance of footage where the ukranian didn't make any contact and gets shelled and killed by artillery after advancing into houses. This is the majority of the war. There are of course some minor skirmishes here and there where russia wants to make a breakthrough such as now liberated marinka, andreevka, and close to being liberated area like soledar (it may already have) as well as the place where ukr is trying to make the advance. But as the ukranian soldiers themselves admit in WaPo published article, most of their losses are not from direct battle, but shelling. Russia did not use conscription. Ukrane did. Russia mobilized it's reserves. If you can't tell the differences between mobilization and conscription, you are not qualified to have this argument.
1