Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "ShanghaiEye魔都眼" channel.

@Bishop46066 where did you read that? Western media? The same media that said there's a labor camp in xinjiang but cant say where it is on the map? Ukrane shelling and killing civilians for holding a referendum asking for autonomy is a criminal act. Special military operation is legal, it doesn't break international law because it's not a war declaration and mobilization so the west couldn't interfere. The US did it to iraq, libya, and more. If that's your standards for crime, then the western country is just as criminal. You are too woke to look at the bigger picture, the sooner the war is over, the less life would be taken. Arming ukrane to the last man to fight for western value is just as criminal, while the one that gives such hope sits by and watches, and do nothing. 1000 times more innovative? Then why is the inflation is highest in 50 years? Why are companies declaring bankruptcy? Shouldn't they "innovate" a way out? Why resorts to coal and not innovate some sort of super duper mega clean power generator that works forever? 1000 times? What a joke 🤣 You are delusional.
1
@Bishop46066 "nationalist friends all over the world" glad to know! My most reliable source of information is my uncle's best friend's antivax mom but I've been thinking that my flat earther friend might also be a reliable source! Ooo i see so it's personal for you, which explains your confirmation bias approach to anything russian related. You just have a strong hate against anybody russian, and that's sad. You even admit being nationalist right wing. Amazing. Do you support bandera ideology also? I'd like to know. Maybe start massacring poor russian farmer you never met in your life? Russian low innovation? Sad to hear. Telegram is russian messaging app that even ukranian still used to this day. Italian parmesan cheese? We've produced those locally now. McD? Since it left, my life had been in shambles. I miss the american obese diet so much. The new McD replacement offers the same food, but i eat along with the containers that has the brand so it doesn't taste the same. And guess what? Stable gas price, stable oil price, stable food stock and price, anything imported has local equivalent for half the price. We are so bad at innovating that our air defense system happens to be the best in the world. We are so bad at innovating that our economy remain stable, unlike the sanction regime enactor. I've said it before and im gonna say it again, if germany is so innovative, why cant they innovate a way out of the current economic crisis and resorts to coal? And guess what? Sweden took in a bunch of terrorists and criminals that now occupy the governmental position, that turkiye had to intervene and ask for extradition to save your people, but i guess you're too much of a woke nationalist to realize that. Sweden best cleanest country amiright?
1
@boknow5506 autism?
1
@latashadolce ooh i heard about some of that. But I didn't know these stones is about those new order stuff. They sounds good tho, but some says it's bad. I dont understand why
1
Remember this, they said : -the sanctions will destroy russian economy -they're planning to remove putin from power -putin has cancer All of which has backfired tremendously. Like you cant make this sht up, it's peak comedy
1
Agreed. They make a stink of the argument that russia "will use nukes in ukr", using a very ambiguous statement from a warning that putin gave to the west in case they are getting directly involved, not against ukr. When one of their own uses a clear, direct nuclear threat against russia, nobody bats an eye. The hypocrisy is hilarious
1
@1ewi5 true. The brits came and pump oil out of iran, pay a tiny dividends (practically stealing) and get the oil for themselves. New government decided to nationalize the oil field, so they overthrow the iranian gov and install a puppet (the pahlavi guy) and reintroduce the exploitation measure but pay slightly more than before. Then a revolution came and ayatollah Khomeini took office. He signed a decree nationalizing the oil fields (again) causing the west to be real pissed and drop sanctions. Pretty much like "if we can't have your oil then you're not allowed to sell" lol.
1
Funny how all of those nations you mentioned have in common is their distaste of a nation that has waged more war across the globe since WW2. And all of the 4 nations you mentioned only ever waged war in self defense after the provocation of that one nation that waged so much offensive wars. This comment is about as clownish as it gets 🤡🤡🤡🤡
1
@jerrelljohnson8027 🤣🤣🤣 iraq totally needs people to defend it by destroying it. Libya, vietnam, south america, syria, all of it right? Lol. How about the regime change operation in a country that the US has no business meddling in? Everyone needs democracy right? It's not like democracy destroyed japan or anything 🤣🤣🤣
1
They already did
1
"World's top manufacturer, I'm funding a battle, and i need your strongest investment" "My investment is too strong for you warmonger, you cannot handle my investment"
1
No worries, russia got arms for sale too! And guess what, they have fast delivery! Unlike with the US, buy arms today, receive it in 10 years!
1
@sakerfalcon5199 yeah man, im not worried. I'm planning to ask the EU to pass a law that makes it illegal for the wind to stop blowing, also make it sunny 24/7 for full 12 months a year. Some people complain about renewables being not reliable but they're just stupid
1
@yippeeki-yay490 sad for you, because only some european and sharing your values and beliefs. Everything you said is a regurgitation of whatever the msm pushed out. Pariah to US and EU? Who cares about countries on it's way to poverty and 3rd world status. The rest of the world is with russia, just like how they are with china after taiwan's unnecessary provocation. You haven't put forward a single proof to your claim. Which shows your belief and claims to be a farce and a rather pathetic attempts at western propaganda. Like lavrov said, russia didn't care what you people think of it. It's so sad that lavrov is so popular that the US had to send blinken to africa in hopes of swaying them to the US. But everyone knows that everyone who's bowing to the US are destined for failure and servitude, just like europe.
1
@baserkarim1933 he's a paid bot from norway. He's always in this channel spouting nonsense.
1
Not really a terminology, he's making fun of recent European bedbugs outbreaks in countries like France etc. "less junk = less chance they are importing bed bugs"
1
Really shows who's in control. Thankfully my country is safe from (((them)))
1
@sergelondon916 AI weaponry is currently in debate and creating bunch of them to combat the issue of lack of personnel will make other countries upset. The way people view a fully autonomous weapon system today is the same as how people view gene editing. Last time a chinese scientist edited a gene of babies, china jailed the scientist due to international pressure. The concern with AI weapons is that is there's a chance it could not differentiate civilians and combatants, and while there's law for war crimes committed by man, there's none for AI weapons, such as who is responsible if the AI commited war crimes. The birthrate decline is happening worldwide due to increased living standards. but in japan it has become very apparent. People are less inclined to have kids when they live comfortable lives and having kids would lead to increased monthly fees, psychological effects (worrying about them when they're out of sight), worrying kids will grow up without goals in life and become a shut in, and most kids are a hassle to raise. The solution should be the government should introduce benefits for having multiple kids as well as giving free education benefits instead of just encouraging the populace to have secks.
1
@mudshovel289 so now you're resorting to childish insults? Go take your meds buddy. Oh right, you can't afford the US healthcare 🤣🤣🤣
1
@mudshovel289 resorting to childish insults? Go take ur meds buddy. Or is it that you can't afford one in the US lol
1
@kristofferhellstrom nothing he says is about learning other languages. Many world leaders and diplomats know English. Even this turkiye guy (seen by his expression upon hearing billstrom answers). the reason they are not talking in english is because english has never been accepted as the global language. It is true that the language is most dominant and a widely used language which widespread use stems from the colonial age, which is why it is still adopted today, even though it is one of the more complicated languages to learn for non-native speakers. The reason is mainly because everyone needs a lingua franca to communicate with each other. Talking in one's own language shows dominance (that one is not a pushover), a sign of sovereignty, a symbol of pride of one's own culture. If you can't understand this, then the intricacies of geopolitics is not something you should debate about, considering your limited comprehension on said subject.
1
The funniest thing is the people who fled aren't even those that qualify be mobilized. It seems those youngsters read too much CNN and can no longer differentiate between a mobilization and a draft.
1
@Deno2100 everyone knows the danger and effects of climate changes, but we simply have no reliable alternatives for the moment. This is not something we can rush. Ditching hydrocarbon all at once may save the climate, but it will hurt the livelihood and create an economic disaster. Look at europe today, a small cut of 30% source of hydrocarbon from russia already led to a catastrophic socioeconomic in europe. Ditching it completely will destroy the society we have built, sending us back to barbarism and conflicts, which stems progress and transition to green energy completely, which will then lead us back to hydrocarbon, for no gains. If the WEF agents are as good as they say they are, they should not have told us to ditch hydrocarbon; they should provide us an alternatives by investing heavily on promising green tech like the fusion reactor or more durable wind turbine that does not produce too much E-waste on both production and maintenance like we currently have. But they don't, their goal is to make money and push for more control, not losing money.
1
@CrazyMig can you read my previous comment? Yours is hiddden
1
Not so peaceful on mideast issue.
1
@RonBerg1 not sure why you said russian aircraft havent done much, they fly hundreds of sorties mission each day (the number is 200-300 according to new york times). Aircraft like SU 25, SU 27, SU 30, SU 35, TU 160, and to a limited extend, SU 57, all have done their parts. SU 25 fly directly over the combat zones, while more advanced aircraft like the SU 35, SU 57 and a dedicated bomber like TU 160 usually carries long range guided missiles and fire them from behind the lines (tho not always, TU 160 in particular has flown deep into ukr territories to hit distant ammo depot/repair station, that according to latest reports, any damaged equipment had to be serviced in poland, because russian keeps striking repair station in ukr). There are tons of video taken from the missile camera hitting ukrane ammo depot, and whenever Konashenkov's report says "using air based missiles" this is what he meant. Ukr had done a dozen offensives towards kherson region, and each time they were repelled thanks to air support. If you want to see a video of russian aircraft in ukrane, go to odo puiu event channel, he seems to have a fascination with airplanes. Channel like french foreign legion in the ussr also had some videos of the war.
1
@RonBerg1 look at the source of that info. It's from ukraine ministry of defense guy, and he is prone to lying. Remember when they said that russia is buying chinese equipment because they are running out of equipments of their own during early days of the war, something that the US media parroted over and over yet provided not a single shred of evidence to support that claim? How about the "tactical retreat from lysychansk" (which the drone recording shows otherwise) to 1 million man army, to the great kherson counter offensive, to the "we've captured 50 settlements we're not going to name somewhere in donbas"... All of them proven to be false. Now, russia has denied buying drones from iran. Iran has denied them too. Not sure what else to say, because there's no reason for iran themselves to deny the info when it is a good PR marketing for their drones. But they did. Russia had a bunch of drones like the orlan as well as several kamikaze drones. The aircraft sorties is light compared to the US, but the US is fighting goat herders and insurgent forces with no air defense. Ukrane is a country with a professional military that has dedicated air defense. Even then it has done tremendous damage to ukr ability to resist.
1
@a.t6066 ok keyboard war expert, because the events on the field show otherwise. And russia has used lots of guided missiles anyway. Russian missile is incomparable to US missile which is bulky and has short range. Russian missile is top notch in the world, even the pentagon says so. Feel free to deny them, your opinion does not matter when experts themselves say otherwise
1
@RonBerg1 i do follow quite some indian channels. Amit segupta, wion, tfi global, free democracy, and more. Turkish media too, like TRT. I don't speak arabic. But I've seen arabic skit making fun of biden. I also follow chinese media like cctv, ctgn, shanghaieye, then also south american media like telesur. All of these media condemns the west and it's proxies, not russia. If you think i live in an echo bubble, you are wrong. I follow many media, including western one like bbc, france24, cnn, nyt, bloomberg, ap, dw, reuters. I know that venezuela aircraft was just seized by argentina due to pressure from collective west, the excuse they are using is that it carries iranian signatures. Argentina is neither part of nato or EU, so sanctions shouldn't apply. The only thing i can say about the west is that it impose it's rules upon others yet do anything it wants using weak justification. US had illegally occupied northern syria for years and stole their oil simply because they dont like the leadership. Now why are there no sanctions for such blatant violation syrian sovereignty and international law? It's rules for thee but not for me. Collective west is a hypocritical, thieving colonialist power that impose it's rules on anybody it wants but do whatever it want regardless of international law. Have you read anything on rules based order? Nothing within it's pages mention anything regarding international law. They make the rules and it applies only to others.
1
@RonBerg1 ok, i guess we can discuss this in the future when it all came to pass. Bear in mind I'm not the only one saying what i said. Many analysts had predicted that the western hegemony is already on its way out. In fact, people had been predicting this since 2019, about the coming of a multipolar world that works on the basis of "law based order" instead of western "rule based order". The future is in the east, exactly in asia. The whole economic weaponization which is totally against the rules of the free market (that the west themselves popularized) had backfired badly and it worked greatly into the russia/china favor. So much so that the UK had relaxed the sanction a few days back, something the western media mostly kept quiet about. Which is why you see the US sowing chaos in ukrane, taiwan, and now kosovo. They are trying to stop this advancement towards the multipolar world through the great reset. This is not a wild conspiracy theory, go to the World Economic Forum official youtube channel. You'll see for yourself. There is no need for me to join. I've fulfilled my mandatory service, and if i do enlist, by the time i finished training the war would already be over. Not that there's any guarantee they'll sent me anyway, russia had 1 million standing army and around 2 million reserves. The one deployed in ukrane numbered 250k. That's a quarter of standing army, rotated every few months. This is not ukrane that train it's troop for 2 weeks (some only got 2 days) before being sent to the frontline. Mark my words, this war would be over before winter. If it doesn't I'll come back here and i will tell you how wrong i was and you were right all along.
1
I wouldn't call it "solved". It's more like applying duct tapes to a sinking ship.
1
Nope
1
 @frankcooke3859 you know the whole thing is corrupt when they have an "f-up move up" policy.
1
@GrandmasterFU666 word is sacred. if one is unable to fulfill their promise, whatever the excuse, then they are liar. period. want a signed document? try misnk and see if the leader of the nation with flag you proudly displayed honored any of it. this war wouldn't have happened if they just stick to the minsk! if it is ukr sovereign rights to opress minorities and join nato, then it is russian sovereign right to pursue it's national security and guess what, SMO is legal on the basis of UN charter of national security! cry about it
1
@GrandmasterFU666 30k isn't much of a fertilizer compared to 200k ukr nationalist that match all the criteria of natseesm.
1
@GrandmasterFU666 You don't need a court of law to maintain trust. If you think so, then there's something very wrong with you. And i doubt befriending people like you is a good idea. A guarantee is given, if one is unable to fulfill that, for whatever reason or excuse, then there is no obligation to trust them either. If they said they wont expand nato but did anyway, then their words that they won't wage war on russia is not to be trusted either. So why should we sit idly by and let them do what they want that goes against our interest? You then touched the fact that russia continues supporting the separatist. Of course we do, your army didn't pull back to give the donbas the peace and autonomy they asked for. So why should we? We're not going to sit idly by when ukr army slaughters our kinsmen. And guess what, if ukr leave donbas alone, the LPR/DPR would have stayed where they were because even russia will not support any idea of expansion of donbas! The budapest memorandum is about trading nukes in exchange for protection, nothing else! Nothing about crimea, nothing about donbas. Based on your logic, then russia can do it because it's not in the document! But even if we step back and accept the idea, ukr decision to join nato is on it's own a threat to the protectors (which includes russia) when the budapest alone is enough to guarantee ukr safety. What kind of protectorate threatens their protector? And if the protector's security is threatened by the protectorate, then it's the protectorate who dishonors the agreement signed and thus we are not obliged to follow them either!
1
why the west-msm didn't report a president refusing to end their terms as violation of democracy? oh right, she's their puppet, which means she IS the democracy.
1