Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "Defender of Fatherland Day rally and concert kicks off in Moscow, Putin hails 'heroic'Russian troops" video.

  1.  @GrandmasterFU666  word is sacred. if one is unable to fulfill their promise, whatever the excuse, then they are liar. period. want a signed document? try misnk and see if the leader of the nation with flag you proudly displayed honored any of it. this war wouldn't have happened if they just stick to the minsk! if it is ukr sovereign rights to opress minorities and join nato, then it is russian sovereign right to pursue it's national security and guess what, SMO is legal on the basis of UN charter of national security! cry about it
    1
  2.  @GrandmasterFU666  30k isn't much of a fertilizer compared to 200k ukr nationalist that match all the criteria of natseesm.
    1
  3.  @GrandmasterFU666  You don't need a court of law to maintain trust. If you think so, then there's something very wrong with you. And i doubt befriending people like you is a good idea. A guarantee is given, if one is unable to fulfill that, for whatever reason or excuse, then there is no obligation to trust them either. If they said they wont expand nato but did anyway, then their words that they won't wage war on russia is not to be trusted either. So why should we sit idly by and let them do what they want that goes against our interest? You then touched the fact that russia continues supporting the separatist. Of course we do, your army didn't pull back to give the donbas the peace and autonomy they asked for. So why should we? We're not going to sit idly by when ukr army slaughters our kinsmen. And guess what, if ukr leave donbas alone, the LPR/DPR would have stayed where they were because even russia will not support any idea of expansion of donbas! The budapest memorandum is about trading nukes in exchange for protection, nothing else! Nothing about crimea, nothing about donbas. Based on your logic, then russia can do it because it's not in the document! But even if we step back and accept the idea, ukr decision to join nato is on it's own a threat to the protectors (which includes russia) when the budapest alone is enough to guarantee ukr safety. What kind of protectorate threatens their protector? And if the protector's security is threatened by the protectorate, then it's the protectorate who dishonors the agreement signed and thus we are not obliged to follow them either!
    1