Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "Russia: Crimea airbase blast was detonation of ammunition, not attack; cause will be clarified" video.

Not as pathetic as the support from 17 western countries yet still losing big time. "We're going to take crimea back" lmao they can't even reclaim kherson since day 1 of the war 🤣🤣🤣🤣
5
@yippeeki-yay490 any proof to that? Last i check, india, china, turkey, hungary, and south america is ramping up their energy purchases. And the reason for the increasing ruble value is due to increase in export but huge decrease in imports. You're saying it's getting traded less? Both india, china, africa, and recently, turkey has had a deal to do purchase using national currency only. If anything, it's the usd and euro getting traded less, and it's value reflected by that.
4
@yippeeki-yay490 ah yes, classic. No argument = just call them russian bot! The thing is, one look at the inflation and currency value, it immediately tells who's gonna have to find another job, washington's bot!
3
@yippeeki-yay490 showcase of the bayraktar, m777, himars getting destroyed, or a showcase of javelin getting plundered? China just extended military tech partnership with russia. So does iran. Turkey, one of the most important and strategic nato members, just started partnership of with russia to improve their drones when erdogan went to sochi. Who's buying western equipment? Ah yes, poland bought a few himars. Lets see, what else getting sold... Nvm, cant find any. Taiwan deal is not finished so it doesn't count. And guess what? Himars, the "game changer" because it destroyed an unimportant bridge that the russian had deployed several poontoons around it? Russia had the tornado s system, which is similar in specification and accuracy but had longer reach (50% more, in fact. For the medium missiles, himars can reach 80km. Tornado s can reach 120). Unlike western missiles which are bulky and cant reach crap 🤣🤣🤣
2
@yippeeki-yay490 why bring such advanced equipment to fight off western junk? "Russia is toast" yet it kept gaining allies and economic partners worldwide lmao
2
@yippeeki-yay490 it's impressive how everything you just said is wrong. Countries are ditching the Petrodollar. They don't want theirs to be confiscated because they did something the US didn't like. Nobody cares about sweden and nato. They are militarily insignificant. And them ditching the kurdish refugees by sending them to turkish dungeon says a lot about their value of human rights. It's human rights but only when it suits them. And they are still pretty much on the turkish hook, if they try to do anything to undo the agreement, turkey can still pull the plug and block their membership. Hungary and serbia has agreed to keep buying russian oil and gas in increased volume. Germany has been pretty staunch on their gas issue, look where that got them. Protest everywhere, latest one there's a video where habeck trying to tell people why they should stay to their choice of not buying russian gas, and he was jeered and called warmongers. In another tour the people are shouting for them to open nordstream 2. The people and the leadership clearly have disagreement. And look where that got bojo, draghi, and the other one in baltic countries. They all stepping down because of the economic crisis they created. Comedic actor only become a hero in a mainstream western media, everyone know he's a clown that had a stash of millions overseas, and a cottage both in the US and the UK. Recently, even western media is reporting on his corruption. Amnesty international has condemned ukraine use of human shield. Cbs has called them out for corruption. Both parties are getting cancelled by people like you for bringing out the truth because it hurts your feelings. What sanctions? Russia has managed to get a workaround for it in many places. Mir payment system is now accepted in china, africa, turkey, uae, india, several european countries, and many other countries as well as several countries that are going to do business with russia in the future such as countries in south america and southeast asia. You are one of those people who thinks that europe and the US is the only country to do business with and the rest of the world is insignificant. That's colonialist logic. Russia future is bright. The economy reflects it. But the crisis in europe and US is very apparent, there's no way to hide it. The white house just changed the definition of recession to hide the recession they are in, but people aren't stupid. You'll probably buy it tho, considering how much msm crap you are regurgitating right now. Russian military is also very capable, it is shown by how much western equipment they have destroyed. If they are waging war the way US did in iraq (indiscriminate shelling, shot every citizen) ukr would have fallen a long time ago. And civilian casualties reflect that. So far russia only has caused 4k civilian casualties, compared to 1 million by the US invasion of iraq.
2
@florabee9283 aircraft cost more than missiles. Lost missile can be replaced. Lost aircraft is a tragedy. If they are trying to destroy anything they should target the aircraft, the pilot, or the runways.
2
@a.t6066 I've told you the russian used both. Artillery fire as well as grad rocket is technically an unguided bomb, and its use has caused huge losses for the ukranian front line troops. How do you think russians keep gaining ground? Unguided bombs like artillery shells and grad rockets are cheaper and thus can be used in greater quantities with devastating effects. If you need to ask about this, you need to reevaluate your knowledge regarding warfare.
2
@yippeeki-yay490 sad for you, because only some european and sharing your values and beliefs. Everything you said is a regurgitation of whatever the msm pushed out. Pariah to US and EU? Who cares about countries on it's way to poverty and 3rd world status. The rest of the world is with russia, just like how they are with china after taiwan's unnecessary provocation. You haven't put forward a single proof to your claim. Which shows your belief and claims to be a farce and a rather pathetic attempts at western propaganda. Like lavrov said, russia didn't care what you people think of it. It's so sad that lavrov is so popular that the US had to send blinken to africa in hopes of swaying them to the US. But everyone knows that everyone who's bowing to the US are destined for failure and servitude, just like europe.
1
@RonBerg1 not sure why you said russian aircraft havent done much, they fly hundreds of sorties mission each day (the number is 200-300 according to new york times). Aircraft like SU 25, SU 27, SU 30, SU 35, TU 160, and to a limited extend, SU 57, all have done their parts. SU 25 fly directly over the combat zones, while more advanced aircraft like the SU 35, SU 57 and a dedicated bomber like TU 160 usually carries long range guided missiles and fire them from behind the lines (tho not always, TU 160 in particular has flown deep into ukr territories to hit distant ammo depot/repair station, that according to latest reports, any damaged equipment had to be serviced in poland, because russian keeps striking repair station in ukr). There are tons of video taken from the missile camera hitting ukrane ammo depot, and whenever Konashenkov's report says "using air based missiles" this is what he meant. Ukr had done a dozen offensives towards kherson region, and each time they were repelled thanks to air support. If you want to see a video of russian aircraft in ukrane, go to odo puiu event channel, he seems to have a fascination with airplanes. Channel like french foreign legion in the ussr also had some videos of the war.
1
@RonBerg1 look at the source of that info. It's from ukraine ministry of defense guy, and he is prone to lying. Remember when they said that russia is buying chinese equipment because they are running out of equipments of their own during early days of the war, something that the US media parroted over and over yet provided not a single shred of evidence to support that claim? How about the "tactical retreat from lysychansk" (which the drone recording shows otherwise) to 1 million man army, to the great kherson counter offensive, to the "we've captured 50 settlements we're not going to name somewhere in donbas"... All of them proven to be false. Now, russia has denied buying drones from iran. Iran has denied them too. Not sure what else to say, because there's no reason for iran themselves to deny the info when it is a good PR marketing for their drones. But they did. Russia had a bunch of drones like the orlan as well as several kamikaze drones. The aircraft sorties is light compared to the US, but the US is fighting goat herders and insurgent forces with no air defense. Ukrane is a country with a professional military that has dedicated air defense. Even then it has done tremendous damage to ukr ability to resist.
1
@a.t6066 ok keyboard war expert, because the events on the field show otherwise. And russia has used lots of guided missiles anyway. Russian missile is incomparable to US missile which is bulky and has short range. Russian missile is top notch in the world, even the pentagon says so. Feel free to deny them, your opinion does not matter when experts themselves say otherwise
1
@RonBerg1 i do follow quite some indian channels. Amit segupta, wion, tfi global, free democracy, and more. Turkish media too, like TRT. I don't speak arabic. But I've seen arabic skit making fun of biden. I also follow chinese media like cctv, ctgn, shanghaieye, then also south american media like telesur. All of these media condemns the west and it's proxies, not russia. If you think i live in an echo bubble, you are wrong. I follow many media, including western one like bbc, france24, cnn, nyt, bloomberg, ap, dw, reuters. I know that venezuela aircraft was just seized by argentina due to pressure from collective west, the excuse they are using is that it carries iranian signatures. Argentina is neither part of nato or EU, so sanctions shouldn't apply. The only thing i can say about the west is that it impose it's rules upon others yet do anything it wants using weak justification. US had illegally occupied northern syria for years and stole their oil simply because they dont like the leadership. Now why are there no sanctions for such blatant violation syrian sovereignty and international law? It's rules for thee but not for me. Collective west is a hypocritical, thieving colonialist power that impose it's rules on anybody it wants but do whatever it want regardless of international law. Have you read anything on rules based order? Nothing within it's pages mention anything regarding international law. They make the rules and it applies only to others.
1
@RonBerg1 ok, i guess we can discuss this in the future when it all came to pass. Bear in mind I'm not the only one saying what i said. Many analysts had predicted that the western hegemony is already on its way out. In fact, people had been predicting this since 2019, about the coming of a multipolar world that works on the basis of "law based order" instead of western "rule based order". The future is in the east, exactly in asia. The whole economic weaponization which is totally against the rules of the free market (that the west themselves popularized) had backfired badly and it worked greatly into the russia/china favor. So much so that the UK had relaxed the sanction a few days back, something the western media mostly kept quiet about. Which is why you see the US sowing chaos in ukrane, taiwan, and now kosovo. They are trying to stop this advancement towards the multipolar world through the great reset. This is not a wild conspiracy theory, go to the World Economic Forum official youtube channel. You'll see for yourself. There is no need for me to join. I've fulfilled my mandatory service, and if i do enlist, by the time i finished training the war would already be over. Not that there's any guarantee they'll sent me anyway, russia had 1 million standing army and around 2 million reserves. The one deployed in ukrane numbered 250k. That's a quarter of standing army, rotated every few months. This is not ukrane that train it's troop for 2 weeks (some only got 2 days) before being sent to the frontline. Mark my words, this war would be over before winter. If it doesn't I'll come back here and i will tell you how wrong i was and you were right all along.
1