Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "Ukraine's Improvised 'Minigun'" video.

It's way more effective distributing those guns to several dudes firing at the same time at the drones than making one dysfunctional makeshift aa system that took ages to reload with accuracy of a drunk uncle with kalashnikov.
45
 @mrwhips3623 the double standard is outright hilarious. Rus using T64 : "museum tank haha" ukr using T55 : "good enough for this type of war"
18
@ironmask5308 humiliated how? In that list, only afghanistan that succeed. The rest is defeated. Either you know nothing about history or just being ignorant. Insistence on first world power? No that's the US. I'm not even going to bother to list all the country it lost in since it's too many 🤣🤣🤣
10
@seanmaguire9950 wouldn't matter if it's not the frontline. If it is then jamming is better, like how the rus did effectively. Not only this thing is inaccurate, it also has a very strong recoil that you can only fire one volley at a time which makes it even less effective. A shotgun would have done a better job at shorter range than whatever this is.
6
@awf6554 hit moscow? Most of them got jammed and fell off someplace. None of it hits the target so this comparison is irrelevant. I said previously that rus can hit strategic target, and strategic target is protected. Not random places. Why would anyone wants to blow up a few trees in siberia just to say "rus air defense is bad, they can't even protect a couple of random trees"
3
@awf6554 a good air defense can protect critical infrastructure and strategic position from air attack. The fact that ukr had lost that capabilities means it's been severely degraded. You don't need to destroy every last AA system to gain dominance when the enemy had so much holes in their defense due to the lack of AA defense.
1
@awf6554 it says everything. They wouldn't need this sort of dysfunctional improvised stuff if they have a proper short range AA system like the pansir, or the shilka/flak type AA. And the fact that rus can strike every territory in ukr with only a few cruise missiles/drones without much resistance, and a lackluster air defense during their offensive which allows helicopter to obliterate their column, shows that their AA capabilities has been degraded to the point of irrelevance.
1
@awf6554 oil terminals in crimea? They are well protected now. As is the case with the kerch bridge. How is moscow a strategic target? And which of these "strategic target" buildings have ukr hit? If a civilians apartment is a "strategic target", then that's a deliberate act of crime. Real data? Lol. Last time a patriot got obliterated, the person who recorded the incident got jailed. You think ukr will give the data of their air defense degradation? The fact they can't utilize them to protect key infrastructure, command center, and protect their offensive is proof enough. This, combined with demands for more AA system as well as official statement by zaluzhny of the lack of AA, is enough proof of it. You are trying to deny the undeniable, which says how much copium you have downed. Where is that offensive now btw? Moved to bakhmut? Why is there no progress? it's been months when it should have reach crimea in 5 days lol
1