Comments by "Far Centrist" (@far_centrist) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

  1. ​ @xqcpog7597  the target is the patriot, and it gets obliterated. it doesn't save anything.
    19
  2. there's this thing called velocity, distance, and the angle of impact. there's no such thing such as "no modern helmot can survive a direct hit".
    8
  3.  @MS-xq8fe  it's on my channel.
    5
  4.  @evgeniybastrykov  the russian target ammo depot and valid military targets, allowing civilian evacuation, meanwhile the ukrop is shootint civilian in bryansk, targeting politicians, and somehow you're saying russia is the bad one? the patriot is trying to protect itself, not the people. and it got hit.
    5
  5. "the kids having to watch and live this... they are innocent and shouldn’t live this... they will be hurt for life!" are you suggesting we should kill them instead?
    4
  6.  @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745  kinda weird that for such massive explosion in khmelnitsky and ternopil, the casualties are next to none isn't it? i thought russian likes killing 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    3
  7. it took russia 9 months to grind ukrane troops in one spot. "we don't have enough men and equipment to launch the spring offensive" "but what about kharkiv" what about it? lot's of losses for small gains and it's not even a decisive battle. wanna know what a decisive battle is? mariupol. all of the azov trapped and russia gained a whole land bridge for it. severodonetsk and lysychansk, where russia captured over 30 tanks and even more apc while the ukranian fled in a very embarrassing manner, captured by drone footage. if ukrane is winning, why is it whining?
    2
  8.  @chill29394  it's not optimism, it's fact, Ronald McFart.
    2
  9. ​​ @Kolibrito_art  the problem is not the name, it's generalizing people name according ethnicity which is racist. you don't just call every middle eastern "abdul" or every slavic people "boris", they all have their own name that very likely not those. that's just rude and borderline racist. but then again I don't expect much for people who supported literal natzis.
    2
  10.  @mrs.6813  neither. kinda sad having to resort to racsism just to discredit someone innit?
    2
  11.  @tracer_dj4415  give us your linkedin, tracer. So we can check ourselves.
    1
  12.  @davidjoseph624  first of, who are you? You are not tracer. And how does posting my private email here be a better solution than you posting your public qualifications on linkedin here? And why do i need to post my qualifications when you are the one that flaunts yours? I didn't flaunt mine. And i dont need to, since my qualifications are unrelated to this subject. The point here is that you showed that it's not just a random boast like the navy seal copypasta, just to put weight on your argument, so we can better decide to trust you or not.
    1
  13.  @mrbreeze40  at showing the hypocrisy of the world's biggest mass murderer, uncle sam.
    1
  14. 1000% justified. You think they'd do this if they have jobs and opportunities?
    1
  15. ​ @wperfect  its still more comprehensible and believable than this piece of "news". Imagine being the sore loser who couldn't take the news of china-russia making an alliance and had to slander just to cope lmao. Goodbye west, enjoy the tasty british inflation 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  16.  @christopherstein2024  relatable to brits?
    1
  17.  @bannedone3ice138  meanwhile the commander in chief is nowhere to be seen, as well as the second in command. they know they're f**ked and is now hiding to avoid the wrath of the people for leading them into the path of destruction.
    1
  18.  @24pavlo  lol try harder, kid.
    1
  19.  @24pavlo  yo mama joke is overused and cliche. can you at least try to be original? not only does it not offend me, i think i will totally forget it in the next minute.
    1
  20. ​ @shirghazaycowboys  you do know that these are recent gains, right? Russian failures now? Which one? There's only gains. If anything there's only kharkov and Kherson offensive in which ukr succeeded, and that was two years ago.
    1
  21. You're telling me that the loss of this one ship is going to change the ENTIRE trajectory of the land-based war? Anyway how's it going with marinka and soon to fall avdeevka?
    1
  22.  @jamesreisenauer1778  5? Seriously? No there's only 2 battleship sunk, that includes the Moskva and now the ivanovets. There are 3 landing ships as addition which are sunk, which, as the name says, landing ships, used to transport goods from ru proper into Crimea (although to a limited degree) and can't fire cruise missiles so it will be relevant in the actual war. There's no 5 battleship sunk, that's fantasy. There are more than 30 ships in the black sea fleet that can fire cruise missiles. The war had gone for almost 2 years now, and there were only 2 of them that were sunk. At this rate, it will take 30+ years to sink them all, and that if we consider ru won't put any new ships into their fleet. 2 years on and the support is already flagging, and you're expecting them to change the trajectory of the war? I'm not sure if you're ridiculously optimistic, or just delusional. What claim? The post from pro ru blogger, or official claim? Because ru officially didn't put out any claims about which territory is about to fall, in fact they only ever announce a territory has been taken AFTER it was properly, completely, and securely in their hands (bakhmut, lysychank/kramatorsk, avdeevka, all announced after capture and has not been recaptured since). A complete opposite to ukr officials who always blab about "taking back 30 villages" which apparently has no name, or a grandpa's house/chicken farm which was called a "village". Then there's the "ukr has taken back 50% of the territory" claim from ukr backers which probably used an esoteric math to come to such absurd calculation. You are merely passing off unofficial ru claims as an official claims. Face it, ukr is close to being finished. Even the leadership is in crisis, and the commander in chief refused to be fired by the president. How wild is that? We don't hear that kind of BS on the ru side. And how does that offensive go anyway? Didn't we get a trailer for that? Seems like it has a bad ending and there doesn't seem to be a plan for a sequel 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  23.  @jamesreisenauer1778  woopsie daisie 13 days later and avdiivka is russiy 🤣🤣🤣
    1