Comments by "Peter Cristo" (@petercristo992) on "Supreme Court to take on Trump's immunity case" video.

  1. In fairness Trump's immunity claim has great merit and great implications. We're talking freedom of speech by a President and a candidate who was never charged with sedition and who was expressing his opinion as do Democrats in politics and in the media.
    23
  2. No. Hunter shouldn't get immunity Lisa sorry.
    3
  3. Years ago circa 2008 President Obama said it would take time to transform America. He said to his followers to be patient but the ultimate goal was to appoint Justices to/get control of the United States Supreme Court, etc.. Please Google.
    2
  4. I didn't know Seal Team 6 was involved.
    2
  5. Chief Sund of the Capitol Police testified prior to J6 he asked for help from both Sageants at Arms at the Capitol. They got back to him stating No, it wouldn't be good for optics, etc.. His request for thousands of National Guard troops was denied....
    1
  6. Those are multiple and speculative questions. 🙂
    1
  7. Yes. It probably will in the future as Trump's property was seized by political opponents/registered Democrats holding office. ✅ And they vociferously campaigned to 'get him'. Period
    1