Comments by "Freedom" (@freedomordeath89) on "In Saddam's Shadow: Baghdad 10 Years After the Invasion with Suroosh Alvi (Full Length)" video.

  1. Wy Zhang 1) thats a hoax from conspiracy theorists..its jsut ridicolous....UK and NATO members went in iraq with the US...if it was about the Euro vs Dollar they swould have boycotted the war. 2) Iraq was a DISASTER after the Iran-Iraq war, the First gulf war in 91 and the 12 years of FORCED EMBARGO and no fly zone it was in a TERRIBLE STATE All your conspiracy theory bullshti makes no sense dude....why do you ALWAYS have to ramble about the FED and banks????
    2
  2. they invaded because: -the war had already started in 1991 -Saddam violate dinternational laws -He was proven to be  a genocidal dictator -he had WMDs (gas weapons) and he used it many times  -he tried to build a NUCLEAR REACTOR (built by france and destroyed by Israel before it was finished) -he caused 2 major wars against Iran and Kwait -His own population hated him and rebelled against him (Kurds and Shias) -there was a no fly zone going on since years -he was using the profits from the oil industry just for PERSONAL INTEREST and to build up his ARMIES -he was ready to SET THE OILFIELDS ON FIRE (as he did in Kwait)  -we couldn't leave a GREAT PART OF THE WORLD oil reserves in the hands of a crazy dictator -he destroyed the ecosystem of Kwait by setting the oilfields on fire and the southern marshess of iraq were desertified -he killed the political opposition -we have videos of him PURGING his own party of people he didn't like -there were millions of refugees from Iraq and many of them were in WASHINGTON and ASKED for an intervention Do you think this isn't ENOUGH to go to war againt him? Do you really need to create some dumb conspiracy theory????
    2
  3. -I'm not murican Let me understand this: I give you TENS of political, economical and historical reasons for a war and you LAUGH them off ...and then assert that its all a FED conspiracy theory? are you that dumb????
    2
  4. How can oyou guys blame suicide bombers on regiem change? I mean..if we had seen suicide bombers in Berlin after Hitler's death...you would have blamed the allies for removing him?
    1
  5. +Fernando Mendoza you disgsting piece of shit.."we should have left saddam in power"...you disgusting pseudo human
    1
  6. mmh..yeah..all because I dont agree with you? such an open mind you have...
    1
  7. HAHAHA I like how to my FACTS you cna only resond with INSULTS! It just shows how fragile your opinion is... " Saddam was better than the ISIS" So drinking piss is better than eating shit, right? What about neither? You silly child ahah you reason like a 12 years old teenager.
    1
  8. Wy Zhang what? no..they didnt invaded for that...thats what the paesants with 0 hisotrical and geopolitical knowledge think....
    1
  9. Wy Zhang "Who backed Saddam back then" so..since the CIA backed up him in the past...they AUTOMATICALLY always do? Don't you see how thats dumb? Soviets allied with Nazis win 1939...but they fought against each others in 1941... CIA supported Saddam when they needed him against Iran..that doesn't eman that they still were supporting him after the 91 Kwait invasion... you are simply ignorant about the facts... No shit sherlock, History is my field, Im perfectly aware of US support to Dictators during the COLD WAR..but that doesn't have ANYTHING to do with the 2003 conflict....you are BIASED against the US...real historians are OBJECTIVE. I am not a fanboy of ANYONE, Im jsut having an OBJECTIVE POINT OF VIEW! SUPER PARTES!
    1
  10. Wy Zhang oh...now UK is a "henchman" ahahaha you know why France was AGAINST it? Because THEY HAD COMMERCIAL TREATIES WITH SADDAM! France helped Saddam build his nuclear reactor, france has always been the slimy one in the middle east, they were the ones doing it for the money all along..but you don't know that..because you never read a book... " Also, by nature and tradition, Britain never like to see a strong and united Europeen continent" and here some more conspirayc theorist bullshit... I made A LOT OF POINTS...you sitll haven't responded to ANY of those....
    1
  11. Wy Zhang "It did what is good for its national interest" no, giving a nuclear reactor to a crazy dictator is AGAINST national interest, its AGAINST world interest. You are dumb, entrenched on your positions and ignorant about the subject. "The world is not running by "good" and "evil" like in your hollywood movies" I never said that there's  agood and evil here..YOU are the one picturing the US as the bad guy of the hollywood movies... you still haven't responded to my points...
    1
  12. "I said, those can be excuses but can't be reasons" why? because YOU say so? YOu need to PROVE it, not just assert it "you should have" IM NTO AMERICAN WAKE UP YOU FUCKTARD!!!! "you should have invaded Saudi Arabia " Are you saying that Saudi Arabia did MORE than what Saddam did? Because thats FALSE. Confront what Saddam did with what Saudis did..and youll understand why Saddam got invaded. "If spending lots of money and lives to bombard and kill is a kind of "help" do you even GRASp the concept of a DICTATOR? Are you saying we shouldn't have bombed Germany in WW2????
    1
  13. Harald Fairhair I don't even reamember. please sum up your points briefly. All I know its that you entered the conversation by calling me stupid and attacking "official history"... That's pretty lame and childish...and when you call me "rude" its also HYPOCRITICAL since YOU are the one who started insulting me. Bring some real argument  or fuck off.
    1
  14. Jt Wilson so what? Emotions are ok as long as you don't BASE your argument on it...
    1