Comments by "" (@bastiaan7777777) on "Matsimus" channel.

  1. F : fighter. But it is actually a bomber?
    10
  2. It's testament to entire society. No respect because no sanctions.... Why follow rules?
    6
  3. It is designed for the military, the price will not drop ;)
    3
  4.  @rickthompson1422  Back when drones were not an issue....
    3
  5.  @filblo503  Sweden wasn't in NATO. They did not want to defend other countries , they wanted to stay neutral. And take care of their own. Now, they want to join. So.. Why did not they join 50 years ago?
    3
  6.  @IsaacKuo  Russians are already using tanks without turrets and added on armor as personnel carriers...
    2
  7. How are the new Challengers repairs and maintenances done: With English (British/UK) measurements; inches, imperial or metric? Turn a bolt / screw left or right to open? 3/4 INCH 1.1/8 INCH 28.57 MM Confusion of the highest order.
    2
  8. Said "Daniel" .... ironic....
    2
  9. 560 dollars for a Bluetooth speaker, it does with rise of the Valkyries as default startup tune?
    2
  10. Why should Europe? To transport what troops to where?
    2
  11.  @MrCABman1972  Blablabla. Not sure what smoking, can not have normal discussion? They paid a very high price for their own defense. In case they got attacked. And they did not give 2 sh*ts about other countries.
    2
  12.  @MrCABman1972  Blablabla.. They could have joined 50 years ago.. but they wanted to remain "neutral"... Well: stay neutral.
    2
  13.  @MrCABman1972  Sure they can choose sides.. How about if say Switzerland joined Russia's side, with say, weapons supplies.. How would the EU /USA react?
    2
  14. FPV Kamikaze drones in Ukraine are currently upgraded with AI software also. German made HX-2 for example. Or the ones from Ukrainian made NORDA Dynamics...
    1
  15. what battlefield? european? where? streets of berlin?
    1
  16.  @CAP198462  Ripsaw F4 is already marketed as an atv...
    1
  17.  @rickthompson1422  Exactly. Agreed.
    1
  18. Soo, Sweden did not pay 50 years of contribution, but now that there is a "threat" they are happy to join. Maybe they should pay NATO 50 years of membership fee? It is kind of like not having insurance, coz dont need / want it, but then when house is on fire: help, I need insurance....
    1
  19. ​ @MrCABman1972  They care about their own interests. Not about NATO. Except crying for help.
    1
  20.  @were-owlinwisconsin4441  There is: All Allies contribute to funding NATO using an agreed cost share formula derived from the Gross National Income of member countries.
    1
  21. Cannot have too much protection as current conflicts show...
    1
  22.  @ElijahRose-u6f  I;ve seen em build on some other channel, turret is removed and plate armor is added, then bricks more armor, rubber padding on the outstde and in.. dunno how effective they are against fpv drones, even now baba yaga drones are starting to be used to drop anti tank mines, weighing 10 or 20 pounds.. that is very hard to protect against...
    1