Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Jubilee"
channel.
-
871
-
355
-
293
-
267
-
207
-
192
-
161
-
127
-
126
-
117
-
114
-
96
-
93
-
87
-
82
-
82
-
75
-
73
-
71
-
69
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
58
-
58
-
56
-
If it is-- that gender is socially malleable or a social construct, how does it coexist side by side with the proposition that the girl who's trapped in a male body-- has an immutable male identity? It's incoherent -- or that only the individual themselves can determine their gender identity-- if it's a social construct, how does that work?? Again, It's incoherent
If it were true, that gender is a social construct, fluid, and malleable and not biological-- why the need to transition biologically, or play dress up, and change their physical appearance? Again, incoherent
They're already, who they are to themselves, and the proclivity to alter their biology, suggests that gender is NOT separate from biology. Why the desire to change if gender is merely a social construct? Again, it's incoherent
No, It's XX, XY, Birth defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment be considered, and btw-- the exceptions to the rules do not invalidate the rules. They validate them, hence being the exceptions
55
-
53
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
@celetial3287 Gender is Binary, Male and Female. It's not an issue. The only issue is people w/ psych disorders -- who don't live in reality about there being two genders.
XX, XY, Birth Defect, That's it! MANY are inappropriately conflating the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with 'gender'.
There are clearly males and females with various biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries, etc.-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon from Star Trek and prescribe hormones etc... and it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and those who think it does are delusional.
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
@guinnmyahslaysstaymad Well, I know what it means, and I used it as intended.
Just remember, when you think things are against you-- it's probably You, and the world doesn't owe you acceptance. If You want to integrate into society-- then remember that it's YOU, who needs to adapt.
To insist that society must play along with your counter-culture position-- makes you seem arrogant, narcissistic, self-entitled and ridiculous. You're not the center of the universe and the world isn't going to reorganize itself to accommodate your subjective feelings, contrary to objective reality. You need to develop better coping mechanisms to deal with adversity, because not everyone is going to like you, or be accommodating.
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@donut_box3553 Perhaps they're merely an acquaintance... I don't know.
Either way, You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
Free lesson to the grammatically challenged regarding pronouns and how they're utilized:
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@ezekielmatta They're arguing that he isn't that which he claims to be. That's just being observant of objective reality. They're the same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after they do. They're LARPing, at BEST
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
9
-
@insektas No, Gender and sex are intrinsically linked. They are not disconnected. Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
You're conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as though they're synonymous with gender-- and they are not.
We're suppose to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that we can promote make believe? Why??
I maintain that gender is not a social construct, or separate from biology. Gender roles are the construct, and so too is the transgender narrative-- a mere social construct, based in subjective lunacy, not reality.
Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior traits. I mean... C'mon now. It's ludicrous
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Only when speaking for yourself -- and then your choices are limited to I, Me, My-- unless you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person, which is pretty weird.
You should get a refund from your English grammar teachers.
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@jaybones2811 I understand the narrative. I just recognize it as incoherent. They suffer high anxiety when facing having to select the appropriate restroom, while whinging about a white, male--dominated patriarchy, at the root of a gender pay gap, while insisting that gender is fluid. Ya, it's ridiculous
The ridiculous notion that the world needs to accept those who can't accept themselves-- as they are, but rather must accept them as their delusional sense of self would dictate-- is ludicrous.
You can chop off your dog's balls, but he's still a male dog. You can shove a chicken feather in your butt, and you're still not a chicken, no matter how much you think you identify as one-- as if you had a frame of reference in the first place-- and you do not.
It's XX, XY, Birth Defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment commence immediately-- That's It. Period, FULL Stop
Alone in the shower alone, they know they're a guy
Found damaged and unconscious in a wreck, the EMT's know he's a guy
Dead on a slab, the Coroner knows he's a guy
Archaeologists finding his bones and DNA, Knows he's a guy. He's a guy pretending to be a girl.
Don't be a science denier... Just sayin
8
-
Booga Ooga The ridiculous notion that the world needs to accept those who can't accept themselves-- as they are, but rather must accept them as their delusional sense of self would dictate-- is ludicrous.
You can chop off your dog's balls, but he's still a male dog. You can shove a chicken feather in your butt, and you're still not a chicken, no matter how much you think you identify as one-- as if you had a frame of reference in the first place-- and you do not.
It's XX, XY, Birth Defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment commence immediately-- That's It. Period, FULL Stop
Alone in the shower alone, they know they're a guy
Found damaged and unconscious in a wreck, the EMT's know he's a guy
Dead on a slab, the Coroner knows he's a guy
Archaeologists finding his bones and DNA, Knows he's a guy. He's a guy pretending to be a girl.
Don't be a science denier... Just sayin
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@fruitguzzi9122 The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or more physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@crisisdude7439 Well, where else would they process emotions, but in their head?
Men tend to exercise and engage in physical activity's (MMA, Hiking, Sports, Weight training, have jobs which involve physical 'manual' labor, etc.) which are an outlet for that frustration-- repressing nothing.
Men don't prioritize that which they get overly-emotional about, in the same way that women do. That's not a flaw.
Consider that women attempt sewerslide more often than men do, though men tend to use lethal force, so succeed more often in their fewer attempts. Is that because men are more efficient or because women are less competent, and are often making an overly-emotional spectacle of herself, for attention because she's mentally unbalanced?
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Birdiee93x Well, being that r@pe and incest only account for 1% of cases, some perspective is required to address the talking point.
On that issue, I would point out that terminating that pregnancy doesn't undo the trauma caused by an attacker.
I would also point out that terminating the life of an innocent child doesn't put aside a woman's trauma; It adds to it, an additional victim and the additional potential trauma of the ab0rti0n, experienced by women in significant numbers.
Also, the value of the innocent resulting child in the womb, isn't diminished because one or both of their parents were bad.
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these-- which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those, who just don't.
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex, so if you want to chase pleasure, you have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes. No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@sashaboydcom Not much of a refutation, not a single direct response to any of my questions-- and the 'Because you said so' standard has been issued exactly ZERO credibility.
Look, I have no dog in this fight. You do.
You, as the minority fringe among the rest of the human population want ME, and the rest of the world, to go along with your narrative and use your subjective pronouns in defiance of reality etc...
Well, you fail to persuade, so you need to do much better.
A male cannot become a female and a female cannot become a male.
FYI-- a woman is an adult human female.
You can neuter a dog and put him in a dress, but make no mistake he's still a male dog, regardless of the surgery and elaborate disguise-- and regardless of how the dog may perceive things, that doesn't alter the fact that he's still a male dog.
Similarly, the same is true regarding the gender dysphoria situation. Their subjective feelings have no bearing on the objective fact that they are not the sex which they claim to be.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@LouisDiCorzo The presumption of fear seems odd.
Gender is Binary, Male and Female. It's not an issue. The only issue is people w/ psych disorders -- who don't live in reality about there being two genders.
XX, XY, Birth Defect, That's it! MANY are inappropriately conflating the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with 'gender'.
There are clearly males and females with various biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries, etc.-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon from Star Trek and prescribe hormones etc... and it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and those who think it does are delusional.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
If you want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
You can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women, or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If your subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then your identity is not valid.
How does advocating in favor of men infiltrating women's private spaces, show any respect or consideration for women and their private spaces???
Why, according to you-- should men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Maksie0 Well, there are those who claim to identify as dogs, etc... Bottom line is, a rooster is not a hen and vice versa. A male is not a female and vice versa, whether human or any other species.
The gender construct is based off the sex assigned at birth, respectively-- and the social nature of being male and female.
You, inappropriately conflate the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with/as gender, and it's just incorrect.
Manhood and womanhood are not merely costumes or cloaks one puts on or takes off, and one's imagination doesn't make their thoughts manifest into reality. Even if you REALLY believe it!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@kyrstenjohnson9752 Beyond the singular "they" pronoun being correct grammatically, it's also far from a modern invention. 'They' has been used as a singular pronoun since at least the late 14th century. ex. 'They' pay their rent on time.
Like I said, you wouldn't use a pronoun like she/he when speaking directly to someone, you'd use their name.
When speaking about them-- to another, is when you would have the occasion to use the pronouns you're advocating in favor of like you're describing, however; you seem to be having difficulty with the concept. You wouldn't say, "Excuse me-- She, pass the salt", now would you? Well, maybe you would, but that's not how someone who understands how the English language works would use it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
He has NO case. The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@markusbaker1161 I know, I wrote it. The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@GrahamChapman The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
You've refuted nothing whatsoever
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@seandevlin4051 The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@OFARA The truth is the truth, regardless of one's opinion about it. You're conflating personality types with gender. I notice you didn't attempt to address my question. What's up w/ that?
If it is-- that gender is socially malleable or a social construct, how does it coexist side by side with the proposition that the girl who's trapped in a male body-- has an immutable male identity? It's incoherent -- or that only the individual themselves can determine their gender identity-- if it's a social construct, how does that work?? Again, It's incoherent
If it were true, that gender is a social construct, fluid, and malleable and not biological-- why the need to transition biologically? Again, incoherent
They're already, who they are to themselves, and the proclivity to alter their biology, suggests that gender is NOT separate from biology. Why the desire to change if gender is merely a social construct? Again, it's incoherent
No, It's XX, XY, Birth defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment be considered, and btw-- the exceptions to the rules do not invalidate the rules. They validate them, hence being the exceptions
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mataj0to561 Critical thinking and Coherent Analysis seems to prove difficult to many.
Their view seems to go sideways with the notion that a girl, trapped in a male body, and that the male identity is immutable since birth, being the justification for transition surgery-- illustrates the notion of gender being disconnected from biology and merely a social construct, as just wrong.
If they're just playing dress up and indulging their own kink and perversions, that doesn't make them the gender that they're pretending to be. Truth
People who don't transition, are men in a dress and makeup, or women altering their appearance, and pretending to be something they are not.
People who do transition, are still their original sex-- just altered to look different. Similar to a nose job... ZERO affect on their sex or gender
IF gender is a social construct, there would be no reason to alter one's appearance, as they would simply be the gender they identify with at the moment, no matter their appearance or biology. Nope their explanation is incoherent
If gender is fluid, and not biological-- Why the need/desire/proclivity to play dress up, or more drastically use surgical alterations, etc.? Aren't they already identifying as what they are? Ya, doesn't make sense. aka it's incoherent
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@lanisehoward8397 Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Liberty5024 Facts are awesome and stubborn things. The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The point is, people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. How is that not a delusional, dissociative state, by definition?
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament (neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), as if or as though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Dear, women attempt it more than men do. Crazier, less competent or both? Men tend to use lethal force, so succeed more often when they do attempt it.
Historically, wars were/are started by the rulers of men and women (Kings, Pharaohs, Dictators, Sultans, Amirs, Emperors, etc.) and the people had no say about it, or being conscripted into service to fight and perish
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
They teach their kids to use firearms properly, to wait to have children until they're married, and tend to have their insurance handled without tax payer subsidies. What are you talking about?
The point here is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Conversation Topic: Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too. Agree? Why? Disagree? Why?
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@elisen838 I'll try to break it down for you... Life is valuable, not disposable, and advocating in favor of terminating children is devoid of virtue, honor, and morality.
Well, being that r@pe and incest only account for 1% of cases, some perspective is required to address the talking point.
On that issue, I would point out that terminating that pregnancy doesn't undo the trauma caused by an attacker.
I would also point out that terminating the life of an innocent child doesn't put aside a woman's trauma; It adds to it, an additional victim and the additional potential trauma of the ab0rti0n, experienced by women in significant numbers.
Also, the value of the innocent resulting child in the womb, isn't diminished because one or both of their parents were bad.
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these-- which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those, who just don't.
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex, so if you want to chase pleasure, you have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes. No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec7352 The 'because you said so' standard has been issued exactly ZERO credibility.
When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately? I think it's only valuable if we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not."
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Well, being that r@pe and incest only account for 1% of cases, some perspective is required to address the talking point.
On that issue, I would point out that terminating that pregnancy doesn't undo the trauma caused by an attacker. I would also point out that terminating the life of an innocent child doesn't put aside a woman's trauma; It adds to it, an additional victim and the additional potential trauma of the ab0rti0n, experienced by women in significant numbers.
Also, the value of the innocent resulting child in the womb, isn't diminished because one or both of their parents were bad.
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these-- which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those, who just don't.
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex, so if you want to chase pleasure, you have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes. No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The child which is in the womb, is there because the mother facilitated herself becoming pregnant, when choosing to risk an unwanted pregnancy, by engaging in the one and only act which causes her totally avoidable, self-inflicted dilemma.
How smart is that? I can name that tune in no notes (Not at all smart)
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex, so if you want to chase pleasure and take that stance, that men should have no opinion or say--, Then YOU have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes, and should probably QUIT trying to blame men for your self-inflicted dilemmas and own it.
No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The fact that the self-delete rates today are higher than they were prior to the implementation of affirmation-based treatment, and even after transition-- are nearly 40% higher than the general population, doesn't illustrate efficacious results, and on that basis I question the claims of the course of treatment being efficacious, as well as the ethics of those who endorse and perform those procedures.
The entire trans-activist ideological narrative is incoherent and falls into the realm of science-fiction, and pseudo-science-- and doesn't rise to the level of actual science
If 4 out of 10 parachutes fail, smart people wouldn't go skydiving, and it wouldn't be a surprise if those that did, went splat.
People with psych issues, so severe that they contemplate and attempt to self-delete-- aren't exactly well-balanced people, by default.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yup. The problem with the trans activist ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
Gender (There are only 2 male/female). Too many conflate gender with personality (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tom boys), and with gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society and without exception they ALL relate to the roles of males and females in those cultures, societies, and countries which all have long-established cultural norms, as though they're all synonymous-- and they are not.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@KAnon-sl2lv Why do you believe that? It's demonstrably false. Both terms sex and gender originate from the Latin words Genus (meaning "Begin", "Birth", "Kind", "Race", "Gender") and sexus (meaning "sex", "Division", "Gender")
The only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Maksie0 No, a woman is an adult, human, female-- and womanhood isn't a costume which men can put on and become women. smh
You've refuted nothing whatsoever, and have not justified allowing men to infiltrate women's private places, like locker rooms, sports teams, restrooms, and prisons, because of their subjective identity claims.
Why do you hate, and disrespect women so much?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markusbaker1161 You have no respect for women, facts nor truth. I don't care about your opinion or your feelings.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@josilynfilms She says, while staring into the abyss and not recognizing what it is she's looking at.
Well, to ALL the feminists who go along to get along, I wish you well in the coming situation, where as a feminist saying it's not that deep-- You'll be living under the tyranny of men, thinking and saying that they are now-- women (in the workplace, on the sports field, in the restrooms, locker rooms, showers, and prisons).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Stereotypes exist for a reason. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@culverculver922 I'm not sure who you're quoting, but it isn't me. You seem to be suffering from some sort of cognitive impairment-- possibly caused by a blunt force trauma to the head.
Doctors don’t assign gender they identify it, otherwise in a patriarchal society everyone would be male because-- apparently we’re worth more.
Foolishness for all to see.
The imagination (which you seem to be using synonymously with 'gender') doesn't transform biology, reality, or anyone's DNA-- Even if they REALLY believe it (which would illustrate that they're delusional).
Like I said, you could have a surgeon transform your appearance to look like a Klingon, but that doesn't make you a Klingon-- even if you Reeaaallllly believe it-- either.
If the chromosome doesn't have a Y, it isn't a guy. Intersex isn't another gender-- it's a birth defect and an anomaly. The exceptions to the rule do not invalidate the rule-- They prove the rule, hence being the exceptions
It's XX, XY, Birth Defect... That's It
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Gender is Not a social construct. Gender roles are social constructs, and they refer to the roles of males and females-- without exception.
Way too many inappropriately conflate Gender/sex (There are only 2 male/female... That's it) with Personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country and society to society and without exception they're all long-established cultural norms, regarding the roles of males and females in those cultures, countries, and societies) as though they're all synonymous- and they are not.
All women are born female, all men are born male and neither are social constructs, fetishes, feelings or costumes
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Erik-fn7kj Science fiction, No. Political science in place of medical science, No.
Look, it's XX, XY, or Birth defect. That's it.-- Science
Having been a behavior modification specialist for many years, working with the developmentally disabled-- I realize that validating a person's delusions resulting from a mental illness isn't how you help or treat them.
I mean, you don't tell a person with schizophrenia who's insisting that the toaster is talking to them and telling them to do harm to themselves or others that they're correct, or by validating their delusional belief that they can fly, as they prepare to jump off the roof of a building, in the name of empathy.
Get Real
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Jay-jaya-02 Not all cultures are Equal, Compatible, nor Desirable... that's why sovereign nations have borders.
You sure are doing a lot of mental gymnastics to ignore the fact that the child which is in the womb, is there because the mother facilitated herself becoming pregnant, when choosing to risk an unwanted pregnancy, by engaging in the one and only act which causes her totally avoidable, self-inflicted dilemma.
It is a living, developing human-- unlike a bacteria, so you're still failing to justify terminating the life of the innocent.
Innocent baby's shouldn't be terminated because adults can't act responsibly.
So, again-- I'll ask you, How do you propose to save people from the consequences of their own actions, or have them choose to make intelligent choices, and elevate their character to more than one of a mere base animal, fixated on it's own self-gratification regardless of consequences?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@OFARA Your view seems to go sideways with the notion that a girl, trapped in a male body, and that the male identity is immutable since birth, being the justification for transition surgery-- illustrates the notion of gender being disconnected from biology and merely a social construct as just wrong.
When someone's brain and biology aren't 'concordant', a psych evaluation is highly recommended. If they're just playing dress up and indulging their own kink and perversions, that doesn't make them the gender that they're pretending to be. Truth
People who don't transition, are men in a dress and makeup, or women altering their appearance, and pretending to be something they are not.
People who do transition, are still their original sex-- just altered to look different. Similar to a nose job... ZERO affect on their sex or gender
IF gender is a social construct, there would be no reason to alter one's appearance, as they would simply be the gender they identify with at the moment, no matter their appearance or biology. Nope your explanation is incoherent
If gender is fluid, and not biological-- Why the need/desire/proclivity to play dress up, or more drastically use surgical alterations, etc.? Aren't they already identifying as what they are? Ya, doesn't make sense. Your explanation pretty much destroys the narrative that the trans-community falls under the same umbrella though aka incoherent.
The ridiculous notion that the world needs to accept those who can't accept themselves-- as they are, but rather must accept them as their delusional sense of self would dictate-- is ludicrous.
It's XX, XY, Birth Defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment commence immediately-- That's It. Period, FULL Stop
Alone in the shower alone, they know they're a guy
Found damaged and unconscious in a wreck, the EMT's know he's a guy
Dead on a slab, the Coroner knows he's a guy
Archaeologists finding his bones and DNA, Knows he's a guy.
He's a guy pretending to be a girl, or vice versa-- a girl pretending to be a guy, or just openly perverted. Be honest about it
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec7352 If a mother's life is in imminent peril and nothing is done, she and the fetus/baby perish-- as it cannot survive at the 20 week +/- marker, outside of the mother-- for the VAST majority-- when those decisions typically required to be made, and so seems to be in a not dissimilar category as suffering a miscarriage, as it goes to the fate of the unborn's termination. How is it not?
Why do you appear to have a problem with women being able to save their lives?
Looks like it Sucks to be you.
Once again, you didn't comprehend a single response given.
If you don't care about a woman's culpability in preventing her own unwanted pregnancy, why and how does, as you've done continually-- pointing to a man's contribution matter? It's not like she could get pregnant, if she didn't facilitate and enable her own risk factors and ensuing dilemma.
What do you think she needs to figure out, that millions of other women seem to have figured out-- related to avoiding their unwanted pregnancy's?
Why does personal accountability and responsibility appear to trigger a response from you that looks like desperation, as you try to reassign blame and avoid a woman's personal accountability at any cost, in her role of facilitating her unwanted pregnancy?
You've failed to explain your thoughts adequately.
How do you continually fail to account for those facts and factor them into your analysis and conclusions?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Too many are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
They're Re-defining things so their ideological activist narrative appears to be based in objective reality, but it just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects associated with being male or female, respectively.
If/when they want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
They can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing relevant but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If their subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then that identity is not valid-- as far as I'm concerned, and none have persuaded me that it is, or even that it should be.
Nonetheless, my observations regarding so many of the comments of the trans-activists, are that they have not illustrated any respect for women or their private spaces by advocating in favor of men being allowed to infiltrate their spaces.
They can't answer why men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markusbaker1161 The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@KenzLovesMovies The problem you have is that life is based in objective reality, which exposes your narratives, as intellectually vacant.
Choosing to call an apple an orange, doesn't alter the nature of an apple nor an orange. Your preferences re: s3xu@l matters don't alter whether or not you're male or female, and neither does choosing self mutil@tion or castration.
The thing is, societies which have been long established, and steeped in tradition aren't obligated to abandon their established cultural norms to support a counter-culture ideology. To suggest that they owe it to you is the height of narcissism and arrogance.
It's for YOU to integrate into the society which you choose to be in, not for them to change for you. Sheesh....
That sound you're hearing is the sound of rejection from the vast majority of the people on earth, of the trans-activist, ideological, cult narratives.
Nobody owes you. Cope Harder
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@vorpal22 Stop your whining. You required quite a bit of prodding, to begin to have a meaningful dialogue. I mean it isn't as if the comments are invisible. They're all still there.
BTW, yes, biologically it takes 2, however; Women ARE to blame for their unwanted pregnancy, that they facilitate, since they 're the only ones who can guarantee the possibility or prevent it (Obviously not discussing an assault, since they're not facilitating it by granting access).
The problem you have with your virtue signaling is the total absence of any actual 'Virtue' in any of your diatribe or unhinged whinging.
Women are the gatekeepers of their own status, and are in charge of choosing to risk pregnancy when they're granting men access, and when they do-- they have no one but themselves to blame.
Deal with it.
You've refuted nothing whatsoever. The topic is after all, women's unwanted pregnancy, not men's unwanted pregnancy-- since men don't risk getting themselves pregnant, women clearly have a different set of priorities and risks to contend with than men do regarding the consequences of their actions.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec7352 When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately? I think it's only valuable if we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not."
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec3733 I did. Your comprehension deficit is all you. I told you, "All women already have body autonomy. They can choose to risk compromising it with a pregnancy for the duration of their gestation period, if they choose-- or not to risk it, if they're not prepared to have a family--
They can also certainly choose not to risk their body autonomy with a pregnancy, as well. At no point prior to conception (barring a rape, for obvious reasons) is a woman unable to choose not to risk her body becoming pregnant.
A criminal attacker takes a woman's choice away, but I asked-- and you never answered, regarding the treatment protocol for rape, including a morning after pill to prevent the pregnancy. My question to you is, and you have never bothered to answer: Is the child's life less valuable if one or both of their parents is bad? I don't think so
Choice is for prior to conception, because after-- come known consequences."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There's NOTHING phobic or hateful about recognizing that they are not that which they claim to be. It's just a matter of being observant of objective reality.
That label is meaningless. Their imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
People opposing the termination of children, in the name of convenience are weird to you? THAT is weird to me.
The child which is in the womb is there because the mother facilitated herself becoming pregnant, when choosing to risk an unwanted pregnancy, by engaging in the one and only act which causes her avoidable dilemma.
It is a living, developing human-- unlike a bacteria, so you fail to justify terminating the life of the innocent.
How do you propose to save people from the consequences of their own actions, or have them choose to make intelligent choices, and elevate their character to more than one driven like a mere base animal, fixated on it's own self-gratification regardless of consequences?
Innocent baby's shouldn't be terminated because adults can't act responsibly.
You don’t want a baby, use a condom or take the pill, Or keep your legs together.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@isabellejarman6475 Well, there are 3 medical procedures for removing an ectopic pregnancy.
The relevant nuance that appears to elude you is, No matter what is done, there is no chance of survival for the embryo, but without treatment, the mother’s life is at great risk; currently, there is no alternative procedure that can save the embryo, even if nothing is done.”
Salpingectomy, Salpingostomy, and Methotrexate. None are called "ab0rtion", I hope that helps clarify it for you.
By the way, a fetus is a different developmental stage than an embryo. Just to be clear
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Maksie0 Not even close. What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
It is they, is it not, who insist on everyone's participation in their LARP and cosplay, with their insistence on grammatically incorrect pronouns etc.???
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CreoleWolf You wrote, "What is anti-woman? Being trans or being androgynous? Because I can at least tell you from my end of it, us tomboys just want to do our thing. We aren't asking anything from anyone. All we are asking is for people to leave us alone. Again, we still identify as being women and acknowledge that we are women. We just aren't "feminine" and don't want to be told what to wear, how we are supposed to act, or what interests we are allowed to have."
The ideology that says trans-women are women-- is anti-women. A woman is an adult, female, human.
I already pointed out that variability in personality traits and temperament are not gender exclusive, but they're conflating it with gender-- as if they were synonymous, and they are not.
The trans-ideology suggests on one hand that gender is a social-construct, not connected to biology, and is fluid.
On the other hand, it claims that a girl who says she's a boy, trapped in a girl's body is in fact a boy, and has an immutable male identity, as justification for transition surgery-- and Both can't be true. Those two positions are at odds with each other. It's incoherent.
Like I said, Best of luck to all the feminists who go along with that incoherent ideology, because in the not too distant dystopian future-- you'll be oppressed by men- who will say they're women.
You, asking what is anti-woman indicates that you don't even see it coming either.
I wish you well
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@imnotnotgameiacmaniac5327 They are Questions, and NO ONE has attempted to address them. Why not? Too Real? Exposes the idiocy?
If it is-- that gender is socially malleable or a social construct, how does it coexist side by side with the proposition that the girl who's trapped in a male body-- has an immutable male identity? It's incoherent -- or that only the individual themselves can determine their gender identity-- if it's a social construct, how does that work?? Again, It's incoherent
If it were true, that gender is a social construct, fluid, and malleable and not biological-- why the need to transition biologically? Again, incoherent
They're already, who they are to themselves, and the proclivity to alter their biology, suggests that gender is NOT separate from biology. Why the desire to change if gender is merely a social construct? Again, it's incoherent
No, It's XX, XY, Birth defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment be considered, and btw-- the exceptions to the rules do not invalidate the rules. They validate them, hence being the exceptions
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@freedommatters7677 I was merely riffing with the metaphor.
1. The mother was alive, prior to the pregnancy, and her actions caused the pregnancy ie. she put the child in there.
2. A pregnant woman does indeed, house her developing child during gestation, obviously.
3. The woman who chose to risk pregnancy, and achieved it-- created another life using her own organs to do so
4. A fetus being in a woman's body, is there because her actions and consent to risk it, facilitated the entire scenario and started the process.
5. When a woman goes into labor, it's not a matter of her choosing when the time comes-- it comes in it's own time (barring induced labor-- obviously)
6. Not when you agreed to baby sit for a newborn
7. Not when they're a baby
8. There is no case, where a woman facilitated the pregnancy with her own actions, where they aren't inviting a risk.
8b. If the mother's life is in peril is the exception to the rule
All abortions have one goal-- to terminate the life of an innocent
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec7352 Did I quote you? Answer: No... You obviously assign life value at some point, as you're desperate to argue about women having a choice to terminate their unborn in the womb, in the name of the value of their lives.
You've also argued about the potential negative quality of life to be for the unborn, as an attempt to justify a woman' arbitrary decision to terminate the life of her offspring in the womb.
So why such a desperate dodge?
Don't value innocent life "Either"? Either??? So, an admission that you don't value innocent life?
There's a notable difference between advocating 'For' something vs not opposing it.
If a mother's life is in imminent peril and nothing is done, she and the fetus/baby perish-- as it cannot survive at the 20 week +/- marker, outside of the mother-- for the VAST majority-- when those decisions typically required to be made, and so seems to be in a not dissimilar category as suffering a miscarriage, as it goes to the fate of the unborn's termination. How is it not?
Why do you appear to have a problem with women being able to save their lives?
Looks like it Sucks to be you.
Once again, you didn't comprehend a single response given.
If you don't care about a woman's culpability in preventing her own unwanted pregnancy, why and how does, as you've done continually-- pointing to a man's contribution matter? It's not like she could get pregnant, if she didn't facilitate and enable her own risk factors and ensuing dilemma.
What do you think she needs to figure out, that millions of other women seem to have figured out-- related to avoiding their unwanted pregnancy's?
Why does personal accountability and responsibility appear to trigger a response from you that looks like desperation, as you try to reassign blame and avoid a woman's personal accountability at any cost, in her role of facilitating her unwanted pregnancy?
You've failed to explain your thoughts adequately.
How do you continually fail to account for those facts and factor them into your analysis and conclusions?
2
-
Nope, that does nothing to address changing rooms, showers, locker rooms, dressing rooms or prisons, nor does it address lost opportunities re: scholarships, sports teams, sports.
The problem you have is that life is based in objective reality, which exposes your narratives, as intellectually vacant.
Choosing to call an apple an orange, doesn't alter the nature of an apple nor an orange. Your preferences re: s3xu@l matters don't alter whether or not you're male or female, and neither does choosing self mutil@tion or castration.
The thing is, societies which have been long established, and steeped in tradition aren't obligated to abandon their established cultural norms to support a counter-culture ideology. To suggest that they owe it to you is the height of narcissism and arrogance.
It's for YOU to integrate into the society which you choose to be in, not for everyone in society to change for you. Sheesh....
That sound you're hearing is the sound of rejection from the vast majority of the people on earth, of the trans-activist, ideological, cult narratives.
Nobody owes you. Cope Harder
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec7352 Your strawman argument doesn't withstand scrutiny.
Their choice would've been to not be assaulted. Duh-- Obviously they're not choosing to risk pregnancy. How does that elude you? I was discussing the choices to risk unwanted pregnancy, and assault victims are by default not included as their choice was taken from them. So-- knock it off, with your intentionally obtuse strawman arguments.
You, shifting focus away from the majority of cases, to the 1%-- as though they're interchangeable is disingenuous at best-- and wavering back and forth in an effort to avoid the truth isn't winning you any points; It is diminishing the potential for you to establish what is currently a non-existent credibility rating even further.
The resulting new human life that results from conception, isn't disposable because they were the result of an attack, or because of a poor choice by a woman risking an unwanted pregnancy, or by the failure of preventative birth control, because life is valuable. That's my pov.
You've already admitted that you don't think life is valuable, and won't-- until your level of acceptable lifestyle and comfort are 1st established. I don't believe that your version of Utopia is even remotely possible.
I know it's difficult for you, but try to discern the difference between avoiding an unwanted pregnancy and avoiding sex. They're not mutually exclusive of one another.
Use your imagination (Giving you the benefit of the doubt here)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markusbaker1161 Don't be triggered. Your aversion to anything that isn't rooted in confirmation bias is showing.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@11235Aodh So, Blacks should all be in Africa is your position? WOW
The Native Americans who slaughtered each other in rituals and wars. C'mon
How far back do you want to go? Adam? Noah? Ancient cultures came to possess their land by way of conquest.
The left counts on the ignorance of the sheep. That being said, no one alive today is responsible for the actions of people 500 years ago. Everyone born from those ancestors are here because of circumstance. Even the Native Americans, that we've recently had confirmed through DNA testing-- are of European, and Asian decent.
The Disgruntled Millennial Podcast writes, “What's amazing to me is the total ignoring of what the Spaniards did to the Aztecs. Now, all of a sudden the descendants of those same Spaniards are being defended as indigenous peoples. WTF???”
Mestizos (90% of the Mexican population) are a mix of white Spanish & Native blood. Mexicans also speak a European language & most practice a eastern Occidental religion that is based in a white, European capitol. Mexico is the result of European conquest. Cortez's Spaniards overthrew the bloodthirsty Aztec Empire that annually declared "Flower" Wars against their subjugated state Tlaxcala & murdered/sacrificed thousands of Tlaxcala’s annually-- to their "gods".
The thing those knob heads crossing illegally, from Mexico, and those who advocate on their behalf can't figure out is that
1) Their ancestry (Mexico’s), stretches to Europe too, and…
2) The illegals coming to the USA, have never been a part of the native tribes that are here.
3) IF they sneak in illegally, they are ineligible for asylum.
4) When they refused Mexico’s offer of Asylum, Jobs and Shelter—they became ineligible for “Asylum” status here in the USA
5) A vast number of these kids are NOT coming w/ their parents. They are found to be w/ smugglers/human traffickers.
Why does La Raza 1) NOT take into consideration that the area they claim-- was either conceded by Mexico, after it got it's ass whipped? 2) NOT address the fact that a large portion of the southwest was legally purchased from Mexico?
Tell me, what part of the United States belonged to Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Nicaragua??
Strange, it’s odd how they don’t seem to realize what Mexico (actually Mexico and Mexicans NOT Spain or Spaniards) did in the Comanche-Mexico Wars, the Apache-Mexico Wars and the other Mexico-Indian Wars-- to the people (who were actually indigenous to the territory United States, especially the parts of the U.S. that used to be part of Mexico or on its old borders).
The Comanche and the Apache both did the serious raids far into Mexico due to Mexico’s belligerence against them. The Comanche almost got all the way to Mexico City in their attacks against Mexico. They weren’t doing that because Mexico was treating them well or because they felt themselves to be the same indigenous people as Mexicans-- and that’s leaving aside Cortez et al, and look at how Mexico treats its actual indigenous peoples-- still to this day.”
There is a lot of genetic and archaeological evidence that supports the Multiple Migration theory (yet textbooks support a debunked single migration). Mexico won their lands by war, lost it by the same. Mexican citizens in the territories that became part of the USA were allowed to keep their property
rights (so no "ancestral" claims hold much weight). They weren't forced to leave. Mexico could never hold Texas. Too many here (including the Comanche) hated them. There was at least one tribe that purchased protection from the Comanche, after having their villages regularly attacked by Mexico. (That would be the Wichita)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mariec3733 Ya, my question is, "How is it anyone else, beside the woman herself's responsibility, to avoid facilitating her own unwanted pregnancy???"
Your reply: Irrelevant chatter, not answering anything. Shocker /S
You have no answer
The Answer: It is Not anyone but a woman's responsibility to herself, to maintain her preferred status (pregnant, or Not). Obviously
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those like you, who just don't.
Besides, you said you were done wasting my time.
You tend to deflect and start talking about assaults resulting in conception, and it bears repeating, since you don't seem to get it, "Your strawman argument doesn't withstand scrutiny.
Their choice would've been to not be assaulted. Duh-- Obviously they're not choosing to risk pregnancy. How does that elude you? I was discussing the choices to risk unwanted pregnancy, and assault victims are by default not included as their choice was taken from them. So-- knock it off, with your intentionally obtuse strawman arguments.
You, shifting focus away from the majority of cases, to the 1%-- as though they're interchangeable is disingenuous at best-- and wavering back and forth in an effort to avoid the truth isn't winning you any points; It is diminishing the potential for you to establish what is currently a non-existent credibility rating even further.
The resulting new human life that results from conception, isn't disposable because they were the result of an attack, or because of a poor choice by a woman risking an unwanted pregnancy, or by the failure of preventative birth control, because life is valuable. That's my pov.
You've already admitted that you don't think life is valuable, and won't-- until your level of acceptable lifestyle and comfort are 1st established. I don't believe that your version of Utopia is even remotely possible.
I know it's difficult for you, but try to discern the difference between avoiding an unwanted pregnancy and avoiding sex. They're not mutually exclusive of one another.
Use your imagination (Giving you the benefit of the doubt here)"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@djack39 The pronoun issue is strange. Personally, I use people's names, when speaking to them, not 1st person, 2nd person, or 3rd person pronouns.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hellfire7726 I know you meant XY, not YY-- but that's besides the point.
You're mad because we don't see you as you see yourself, and we aren't falling for your disguise, or your incoherent explanations of your ideology... Now, go cry about it.
You don't accept yourself, so go through elaborate measures to transform your appearance into something you're not, and expect to be accepted for your disguise, as opposed to being accepted for who and what you really are. That's not even as deep as a baby-spoon, and you act like it's as deep as the ocean and filled with the wisdom of the ages
It's XX, XY, Birth Defect. Deal with it
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheLegendOfRandy You said, "You know what other pregnancies are non-viable? Every single pregnancy prior to 24 weeks of gestation."
Think deeper thoughts. A single digit IQ isn't something you ought to be trying to tout as admirable, or as some sort of achievement.
If that were correct, the human race would have faded away thousands of years ago. Clearly you're Wrong, as those pregnancy's which are only 24 weeks into the gestation cycle tend to continue to develop, until the end of the gestation cycle and are birthed into the world.
BTW, Nov 11, 2021On November 10, Guinness World Records announced that an Alabama baby had become the "world's most premature baby" to survive.Curtis Means was born at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital on July 5, 2020, at just 21 weeks and one day gestation, the university said. He weighed just 420 grams (14.8 ounces) at birth, according to Guinness World Records
Sigh...
2
-
2
-
@mariec7352 The 1st sentence of your comment where you said, "What are you even talking about, by the way...? "-- was the 1st indicator that you didn't understand.
Your clearly scrambled comprehension, evidenced by the rest of your statements where you fail to discern the difference between avoiding an unwanted pregnancy, and avoiding sex is another indicator.
You assert I deny facts, and refute nothing-- Again. You still need to do much better
The fact is, terminating the innocent is not justifiable, and you still have no argument to the contrary
I don't care about your opinions, or your irrational attempts at justifying the unjustifiable.
No one is forcing people to risk unwanted pregnancy. Other than a rape scenario, which is 1% of cases-- Women are the ones who need to exercise control over their body's to prevent their own unwanted pregnancies, in the other 99% of cases.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@geekmongerer Look, it's XX, XY, Birth Defect/Anomaly... That's it
They're attempting to rename and recategorize the variability in personality traits, and temperament (Neither of which, are gender exclusive-- Hence tomboys, effeminate males, and butch females) "Gender", and that's just wrong.
Gender Dysphoria is an extremely rare condition, and there are those who argue that most "Trans" people are merely unapologetically, embracing their particular perversions but are being inappropriately grouped together under the 'Gender Dysphoria' umbrella.
Their intolerance for themselves, and those who recognize them for what they are, as opposed to what they wish they were, or how they wish they would be perceived, is a THEM-- problem, that they're trying to make into a 'Me'/'US' (The vast majority of the human population's) problem, and the answer to that is-- No
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Well, being that r@pe and incest only account for 1% of cases, some perspective is required to address the talking point.
On that issue, I would point out that terminating that pregnancy doesn't undo the trauma caused by an attacker. I would also point out that terminating the life of an innocent child doesn't put aside a woman's trauma; It adds to it, an additional victim and the additional potential trauma of the ab0rti0n, experienced by women in significant numbers.
Also, the value of the innocent resulting child in the womb, isn't diminished because one or both of their parents were bad.
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these-- which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those, who just don't.
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex, so if you want to chase pleasure, you have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes. No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@empresscrafts689 Like I said, Male and female are biological categories which are fixed and permanent.
All they're doing is altering their appearance and body chemistry.
Identities which conflict with biology, are those of people w/ various psych issues who are delusional, and dissociative-- by definition.
Affirming that individual's dissociative state as valid isn't justified, nor helpful-- evidenced by the stats showing that they have a self-termination rate nearly 10x's higher than the accounted for norm, even after they alter their appearance.
They're not 'Trans' ANYTHING whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are-- after.
The societal and cultural aspects that you're referring to, are those of personality traits and temperament (which aren't gender exclusive-- hence butch females, effeminate males, and tomboys).
No, for those reasons the incoherent activist ideology and narratives don't pass scrutiny.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
True gender dysphoria is very rare, and I believe the trans-activist ideology and narratives are inappropriately grouping trans people, who are for the most part, merely unapologetically embracing and indulging their perversions-- under the gender dysphoria umbrella. It's disingenuous at BEST
Liberals want to give your children hormone blockers, inject them with poison, shame them for their skin color, teach them to be gay, allow them to be groomed by pedophiles and give control of them over to the state.
The sad part is that I don't have to exaggerate these claims.
They openly support this evil.
You are watching the death spiral of the Democratic party.
To the feminists who go along with their incoherent ideology-- Best of luck in your near dystopian future, where you'll then be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will say they're women too. And they don't even see it coming. Don't say, no one ever told you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kay-ju4gj Fyi, gender dysphoria is a mental disorder too, but when you operate as though your subjective self-perception, which is not based in objective reality-- but must be considered valid by the rest of the world-- coupled with the notion that others must perceive you as you perceive yourself-- is TOTALLY Narcissistic. How is it not?
Perhaps, they're merely an acquaintance... I don't know.
Either way, You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
Free lesson to the grammatically challenged regarding pronouns and how they're utilized:
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dogenjoyer2480 Ya, because regardless or choosing to chemically castrate themselves, and / or alter their physical appearance, or claiming a subjective gender identity, and choosing to wear a dress, portraying a stereotypical caricature of the opposite sex-- they're men.
ALL men are born male, all women are born female and that state is fixed and permanent as it is with all mammalian species-- and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, preference, personality trait or temperament, or a costume.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ElanaVital83 Their capacity for logic, reason, critical thinking, and intelligent analytical capacity is impaired so severely-- that expecting them to reach intellectually sound conclusions isn't in and of itself logical or reasonable.
I mean, they can't grasp the fact that the prerequisite to being a woman is being born female.
They totally get it wrong on gender. Then, they conflate personality with gender. Then, they conflate gender, temperament and personality with gender and gender roles. Then, they conflate males with females. Then, they conflate men with women. Then, they conflate reality with imaginary fiction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jupiterfox7683 If as you suggest, gender and sex aren't connected (That's incorrect)-- justify those biological men being granted access to women's private spaces. You can't because they aren't. I already told you,quit conflating gender with personality. They aren't synonymous.
Look, Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and relates to the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Cis/Trans are used in chemistry, to determine the stability and certain placement of molecules; it has NOTHING to do with gender. Gender and Personality-- They haven't learned the difference.
There's only one kind of woman, and they are all born females, so... using the cis prefix is totally redundant and unnecessary.
The entire ideological narrative is incoherent nonsense. They completely get it wrong on gender. Then they conflate gender and personality. Then, they conflate gender and gender roles. Then, they conflate what women are with men. smh
There are males and females. That's it! Men in drag are still men.
A woman isn't a costume, personality or a social construct; She's one half of the binary dichotomy of mammals-- specifically, humans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SCALE.TIPPER The problem you have is that life is based in objective reality, which exposes your narratives, as intellectually vacant. Wishing life were different, doesn't make it so
Choosing to call an apple an orange, doesn't alter the nature of an apple nor an orange. Your preferences re: s3xu@l matters don't alter whether or not you're male or female, and neither does choosing self mutil@tion or castration.
The thing is, societies which have been long established, and steeped in tradition aren't obligated to abandon their established cultural norms to support a counter-culture ideology. To suggest that they owe it to you is the height of narcissism and arrogance.
It's for YOU to integrate into the society which you choose to be in, not for them to change for you. Sheesh....
That sound you're hearing is the sound of rejection from the vast majority of the people on earth, of the trans-activist, ideological, cult narratives.
Nobody owes you. Cope Harder
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@briannachilders772 You obviously don't know what that word 'bigot' means either. There's no hate involved in recognizing that they are not that which they claim to be. It's just an observation.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 Of that, I have No doubt. Really?? Research the following:
Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review
32 studies were examined for a total of 3463 patients screened. Thirty-two studies met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated, and references were manually reviewed in order to include additional relevant studies in this review. Female-to-male (FtM) surgery and male-to-female (MtF) surgery was discussed in 23 and 10 studies, respectively. One study discussed both. Varying patterns of complications were observed in FtM and MtF surgeries, with increased complications in the former because of the larger size of the neourethra. Meatal stenosis is a particular concern in MtF surgery, with complication rates ranging from 4 to 40%, and usually require meatotomy for repair. Stricture and fistulization are frequently reported complications following FtM surgery. In studies reporting on fistulae involving the urethra, 19–54% of fistulae resolved spontaneously without further surgical intervention. High rates of complications are reported in the current literature, which should be understood by patients and practitioners alike. Shared decision making with patients regarding incidence and management of urethral complications including stricture disease and fistulae, particularly after FtM surgery, is critical for setting expectations and managing postoperative outcomes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wulfiii1490 It's XX. XY, Birth Defect... That's it.
They're trying to rename personality traits, "Gender", as if they're interchangeable. They're wrong.
To ALL the feminists who go along to get along, I wish you well in the coming situation, where as a feminist-- You'll be living under the tyranny of men, thinking and saying that they are women while they add to your competition in the workplace, take over women's sports, locker rooms, restrooms and showers, as well as in prisons.
They're trying to turn womanhood into a costume that can be worn like a disguise. You'll see, and when they do-- don't say nobody told you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@krasmasov6852 Here you are-- For those confused about pronouns:
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What??? Neither your anxiety about reality, your personality, your preferences, nor your fashion choices change your gender, and I suppose that might bug a group of guys pretending to be Cinderella for attention, but sometimes the truth stings.
All women are born female, all men are born male (ZERO exceptions), and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, personality, or a costume.
Now you know better. You're Welcome
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
They're merely caricatures of what they 'WISH' they were and can never be
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
@anniebananie416 I absolutely agree. Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men-- who will say they're women... And they don't even see it coming. I don't get it
I mean, Gender and sex aren't disconnected.
Gender is NOT a social construct.
Gender roles are the social constructs and they're well-established, which is why the counter-culture trans-narrative is itself the real construct and they seem unable to process that distinction.
Their inability to process the truth of it, doesn't invalidate the truth.
I'm not going to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that I can promote make believe, or cater to feelings. NO! Just... No
They're still men
Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior and personality traits.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nonetheless, once a male... always a male. Wishing life were different, changes nothing.
The problem you have is that life is based in objective reality, which exposes your narratives, as intellectually vacant.
Choosing to call an apple an orange, doesn't alter the nature of an apple nor an orange. Your preferences re: s3xu@l matters don't alter whether or not you're male or female, and neither does choosing self mutil@tion or castration.
The thing is, societies which have been long established, and are steeped in tradition, aren't obligated to abandon their established cultural norms to support a counter-culture ideology. To suggest that they owe it to you to deny objective reality, and participate in the grand delusion, LARP and cosplay is the height of narcissism and arrogance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately? I think it's only valuable if we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not."
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things you've said, and about things you've alleged I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 Poor baby, can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy. Your arguments and ideological narratives are incoherent nonsense.
You've been thoroughly discredited to my satisfaction, and you've done nothing but make a spectacle of yourself by making demonstrably false statements. It's rather p@thetic on your part.
There are no "trans" people. There are only human people, and humans are males or females, respectively... That's it, there are exactly ZERO exceptions
Cis/trans are terms used by cult activists to pretend that not all men are born male, and to pretend that not all women are female-- BUT they are
You Fail to persuade
It is the trans-activists like you, who's insistence that others-- who are already minding their own business, participate in your LARP and cosplay, by insisting on the grammatically incorrect use of pronouns, and with no regard for the displacement of women's privacy, which is at the root of how you brought your business to everyone in public, making it their business. Irony or idiocy? Quit your whining. You look and sound ridiculous
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What's the rational for that hypothesis?
Middle ground, to what end?
Is there a middle ground between objective reality and the potential number of infinite, subjective individual claims of 'identity'-- which happen to to be objectively false?
The inappropriate conflation of personality traits and temperament, neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys-- with gender, is causing a lot of confusion.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively, and male and female are in fact biological categories which are fixed and permanent.
I posit that there isn't trans anything. You're still the same sex/gender prior to altering your appearance, as you are after, and if gender is fluid-- why the need to change??
It's like extreme LARPing/cosplay to people who recognize that you are not that which you claim to identify as and/or present yourself as.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 Oh, the stalker troll again 🙄
1. Re-Read the 1st sentence of the OP
2. Evidence?
I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@heyheyhey0220 No, not at all. You do seem to be virtue signaling, the problem is the absence of any actual virtue.
They're trying to rename personality traits, "Gender", as if they're interchangeable. They're wrong.
To ALL the feminists who go along to get along, I wish you well in the coming situation, where as a feminist-- You'll be living under the tyranny of men, thinking and saying that they are women while they add to your competition in the workplace, take over women's sports, locker rooms, restrooms and showers, as well as in prisons.
They're trying to turn womanhood into a costume that can be worn like a disguise. You'll see, and when they do-- don't say nobody told you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 It still applies, even if you don't get it. When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately? I think it's only valuable if we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not."
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook, and it's why you're dismissed as less than useless.
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 Your reply= Irrelevant chatter, and addresses nothing but your own bigotry. Shocker /S
You have no answer
The Answer: It is Not anyone but a woman's responsibility to herself, to maintain her preferred status (pregnant, or Not). Obviously
Like I said, "I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those like you, who just don't."
Besides, you said you were done wasting my time.
You tend to deflect and start talking about assaults resulting in conception, and it bears repeating, since you don't seem to get it, "Your strawman argument doesn't withstand scrutiny.
Their choice would've been to not be assaulted. Duh-- Obviously they're not choosing to risk pregnancy. How does that elude you? I was discussing the choices to risk unwanted pregnancy, and assault victims are by default not included as their choice was taken from them. So-- knock it off, with your intentionally obtuse strawman arguments.
You, shifting focus away from the majority of cases, to the 1%-- as though they're interchangeable is disingenuous at best-- and wavering back and forth in an effort to avoid the truth isn't winning you any points; It is diminishing the potential for you to establish what is currently a non-existent credibility rating even further.
The resulting new human life that results from conception, isn't disposable because they were the result of an attack, or because of a poor choice by a woman risking an unwanted pregnancy, or by the failure of preventative birth control, because life is valuable. That's my pov.
You've already admitted that you don't think life is valuable, and won't-- until your level of acceptable lifestyle and comfort are 1st established. I don't believe that your version of Utopia is even remotely possible.
I know it's difficult for you, but try to discern the difference between avoiding an unwanted pregnancy and avoiding sex. They're not mutually exclusive of one another.
Use your imagination (Giving you the benefit of the doubt here)"
1
-
1
-
@knithearts I'm a retired Behavior Modification Specialist, and am fully aware of the condition.
Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of one's identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then that identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 That's not an answer.
Your reply= Irrelevant chatter, not answering anything. Shocker /S
You have no answer
The Answer: It is Not anyone but a woman's responsibility to herself, to maintain her preferred status (pregnant, or Not). Obviously
Like I said, "I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those like you, who just don't."
Besides, you said you were done wasting my time.
You tend to deflect and start talking about assaults resulting in conception, and it bears repeating, since you don't seem to get it, "Your strawman argument doesn't withstand scrutiny.
Their choice would've been to not be assaulted. Duh-- Obviously they're not choosing to risk pregnancy. How does that elude you? I was discussing the choices to risk unwanted pregnancy, and assault victims are by default not included as their choice was taken from them. So-- knock it off, with your intentionally obtuse strawman arguments.
You, shifting focus away from the majority of cases, to the 1%-- as though they're interchangeable is disingenuous at best-- and wavering back and forth in an effort to avoid the truth isn't winning you any points; It is diminishing the potential for you to establish what is currently a non-existent credibility rating even further.
The resulting new human life that results from conception, isn't disposable because they were the result of an attack, or because of a poor choice by a woman risking an unwanted pregnancy, or by the failure of preventative birth control, because life is valuable. That's my pov.
You've already admitted that you don't think life is valuable, and won't-- until your level of acceptable lifestyle and comfort are 1st established. I don't believe that your version of Utopia is even remotely possible.
I know it's difficult for you, but try to discern the difference between avoiding an unwanted pregnancy and avoiding sex. They're not mutually exclusive of one another.
Use your imagination (Giving you the benefit of the doubt here)"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Erik-fn7kj Both of your examples, as I already pointed out-- are people talking to others, Not talking to me.
My friends, peers, family, and employees refer to me as Zach, sir, or Mr. Petersen, as for the rest-- whatever... I've never had someone refer to me as he or she when speaking to me, because that's not how people talk.
If people say whatever they say, when talking to others-- not in my presence-- couldn't care less.
If they're just trying to be provocative and be snarky and for example say, Mrs. Petersen-- I let them know I used to work with the developmentally disabled and they didn't seem to have trouble telling the difference, and ask what's their excuse.
Once, I had a snarky girl ask when I was going to cut my hair, (insinuating I looked like a girl) It was the 80's back then-- I asked her when she was going to go on Jenny Craig. Her friend spit out her soda laughing at her well deserved pwnage
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GrahamChapman You should try being relevant for a change. Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nkkenlken3220 Quit conflating Gender (There are only 2 male/female), with Personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive--hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (ALL refer to the roles of males and females in society, ALL are steeped in tradition, with long-standing historical context based in reality, and vary from culture to culture, society to society and country to country), as though they're all synonymous. They simply aren't.
A woman isn't a social construct, feeling or a costume. Women (ALL of them)are born female, making the use of cis/trans intellectually stunted, useless and totally irrelevant.
Now you know better
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Speaking of facts-- The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are factually, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Only when speaking for yourself -- and then your choices are limited to I, Me, My-- unless you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person, which is pretty weird.
You should get a refund from your English grammar teachers.
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 What??? You're the one who tries to make silly distinctions, by insisting that sex and gender are separate and disconnected-- Not me. I disagree. I am just trying to have a clear understanding of what you were asking.
Science says, People are biological beings, existing in objective reality. They are categorized scientifically as humans, and humans are mammals, and all mammals are all male or female, respectively-- as is the binary dichotomy of ALL mammals.
People (Males and females) create social constructs. Social constructs don't create people (Males and females).
Social constructs don't alter biology, so calling trans women-- women is grammatically incorrect, as it would be to use a she/her pronoun for a male who's only female in their imagination. Don't get me wrong,you're free to play along if you choose, but in reality-- still men
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes... Morons, and trolls seem to be the majority of their demographic's makeup.
True gender dysphoria is very rare, and I believe the trans-activist ideology and narratives are inappropriately grouping trans people, who are for the most part, merely unapologetically embracing and indulging their perversions-- under the gender dysphoria umbrella. It's disingenuous at BEST
Liberals want to give your children hormone blockers, inject them with poison, shame them for their skin color, teach them to be gay, allow them to be groomed by pedophiles and give control of them over to the state.
The sad part is that I don't have to exaggerate these claims.
They openly support this evil.
You are watching the death spiral of the Democratic party.
To the feminists who go along with their incoherent ideology-- Best of luck in your near dystopian future, where you'll then be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will say they're women too. And they don't even see it coming.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@harpoonmcfierce9697 the metric that there are male and female, that they're permanent states, and that it's verifiable via genetic testing long after a person's dead. How is that confusing to you?
The narrative suggests that gender is fluid, and simultaneously suggests that the justification for gender reassignment surgery and treatment is that the girl who's trapped in a male body, has an immutable male identity are competing ideas. Both can't be true. Actually, neither are true.
The gender ideology narrative is incoherent, and just wrong. It seems to conflate personality traits like masculinity, femininity, aggressiveness, passivity, agreeableness (which are not gender specific), for gender-- and it's just wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
You can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women, or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If your subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then your identity is not valid.
How does advocating in favor of men infiltrating women's private spaces, show any respect or consideration for women and their private spaces???
Why, according to you-- should men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's not incorrect. Only when speaking for yourself -- and then your choices are limited to I, Me, My-- unless you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person, which is pretty weird.
You should get a refund from your English grammar teachers.
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheLegendOfRandy It's as though you fail to realize that my comments are actually visible.
You're exhibiting a major glitch in your comprehension capacity-- Again.
Your failed car analogy simply doesn't withstand scrutiny. I'm saying it doesn't matter if you did or not. You wreck your own car, you have no one else to blame-- similarly, the same applies to women getting pregnant, when they facilitate their avoidable dilemmas
Your capacity for misdirected, and fatally flawed analysis, leading you to intellectually bankrupt conclusions is amazing, and well documented throughout the comment section-- of you getting owned again and again, failing to justify the termination of the innocent in the womb.
Like I said, I'm not under the impression that there's a place for a meeting of the minds between those who value life, and those like you who do not, and categorize it as disposable, in the name of convenience.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the innocent to be disposable in the name of convenience, are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nerd5 1. Genetics/DNA XX, XY, Birth Defect, and There are clearly males and females with several biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are A-sexual w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@diavoios Respect is earned, and is not owed otherwise.; while Civility is another matter, which you appear to also conflate inappropriately.
I have zero confusion about the fact that men cannot become women, or the fact that women cannot become men, or the fact that all women are born female, or the fact that all men are born males, or about the fact that-- that status is fixed and permanent.
You appear to be inappropriately conflating gender (There are only 2-- male/female) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), as though they're synonymous, and they just aren't.
Then, you seem to conflate gender, personality, temperament and gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society-- BUT, without exception ALL refer to the roles of males/females in those cultures,countries, and societies... which ALL have long-established cultural norms, steeped in tradition).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mollyvirgo4357 Autonomy definition, independence or freedom, as of the will or one's actions: the autonomy of the individual. A newborn baby, an infant, toddler, or someone in a coma, a minor child, an elderly adult suffering from Alzheimer's, someone with a severe developmental disability, do not possess independence or the freedom to carry out their own will, as such, lest they present a danger to themselves and/or others
1
-
1
-
They're inappropriately attempting to rename and recategorize the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence tomboys, butch females, and effeminate males) "Gender"-- and that's incorrect.
They're mad because we don't see them as they see themselves, and we aren't falling for their disguise, or their incoherent explanations of their ideology...
They don't accept themselves, so go through elaborate measures to transform their appearance into something they're not, and expect to be accepted for their disguise, as opposed to being accepted for who and what they really are. That's not even as deep as a baby-spoon, and they act like it's as deep as the ocean and filled with the wisdom of the ages
It's XX, XY, Birth Defect. Deal with it
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem with the trans activist ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
Gender (There are only 2 male/female). Too many conflate gender with personality (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tom boys), and with gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society and without exception they ALL relate to the roles of males and females in those cultures, societies, and countries which all have long-established cultural norms, as though they're all synonymous-- and they are not.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, there are both physical and temperamental differences between males and females. They're not interchangeable widgets.
Why do you believe that? It's demonstrably false. Both terms sex and gender originate from the Latin words Genus (meaning "Begin", "Birth", "Kind", "Race", "Gender") and sexus (meaning "sex", "Division", "Gender")
The only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2 male/female) with 'Gender Roles' (Social construct which refers to the roles of males and females in society) and again with Personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys)-- as though they're synonymous, and they are Not.
All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, persona or a costume
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GrahamChapman YOU certainly haven't made a case, or refuted anyone.
Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@baristaz8834 1. The short answer is: reality, and the ability to discern fact from fiction.
In a car wreck, the EMT's know it's a male or a female
On the coroner's slab, they know it's a male or a female
Archaeologists can identify them as a male or a female
Because... That's all there is. Male or Female, and that condition is permanent, regardless of delusions to the contrary
2. How is that relevant; I never made any comments about feelings?
3. Mutilation: Mutilation or maiming is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person, so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured. How is that confusing to you??
4. Men who have vasectomies are not now women, and they're under no delusion about that-- being the point your suggestion fails to take into account. In addition, they're reversible ie. Not permanent, they also don't detach or disfigure anything. Bad Comparison example. It shows that you don't understand the meaning of the words you're using, as evidenced by the definition of mutilation.
Hope that clarifies things for you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 Some synonyms for caricature are: parody, joke, cartoon, sham, farce, mockery... Take your pick, either way-- they're not women and never will be.
If men aren't suffering from gender dysphoria and they dress like, and present as women, they're just engaging in cosplay.
Coincidentally, if they do suffer w/ gender dysphoria, their dissociative delusions don't transform them into women, either
Same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after they do. They're nothing more than a cheap knockoff of the genuine article.
Too bad, So sad
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, they inappropriately and incorrectly conflate personality traits and temperament neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys, with gender as if they're synonymous and they aren't. Then, they conflate gender and gender roles. Them, they conflate gender with s3xu@l preference. Then, they conflate males with females, men with women, science with science-fiction and pseudo science, and finally reality with fantasy. Their entire ideological narrative is incoherent madness.
There's only 1 kind of woman, and they're ALL born female, making the cis prefix totally irrelevant and useless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@becky14 Well, being that r@pe and incest only account for 1% of cases, some perspective is required to address the talking point.
On that issue, I would point out that terminating that pregnancy doesn't undo the trauma caused by an attacker.
I would also point out that terminating the life of an innocent child doesn't put aside a woman's trauma; It adds to it, an additional victim and the additional potential trauma of the ab0rti0n, experienced by women in significant numbers.
Also, the value of the innocent resulting child in the womb, isn't diminished because one or both of their parents were bad.
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these-- which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those, who just don't.
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex in the other 99% of cases, so if you want to chase pleasure, you have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes. No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Domino454545 Their imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate. Those who are in a dissociative state, don't dictate what is acceptable or normal to those who aren't suffering with those sorts of psych issues
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 I recognize that they are not that which they claim to be or present themselves as, like it or not.
The fact is that the social norms are actually established currently, and a dude in a dress LARPing and engaging in cosplay are clearly not it, and even if they were-- it's still a dude in a dress not trans anything. They're the same exact sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after.
These dudes like Blossom are the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after they do.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Roxana Blacksea It's XX, XY, Birth Defect, Psych Disorder. That's it!
Like I said, If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
You've failed to refute that, and the 'because you said so' standard has been issued zero credibility, as you've failed to persuade.
You seem to inappropriately be conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament-- (neither of which are gender exclusive, hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboy) with gender.
I mean, you can identify as a Klingon for all I care, but that doesn't make it so; So-- how are they, who think it does Not delusional and detached from reality evidenced by their clearly dissociative state???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@_trevorbutler_ Quit conflating gender-- there are 2 (Male/female), with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and None are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys), and gender roles-- as though they're synonymous. They Aren't.
Gender refers to the sex observed and documented at birth, and also refers to the social aspects (Gender Roles-- which vary from country to country, society to society, and culture to culture. They are long established, and steeped in tradition-- BUT, they all relate to males and females) of being male or female, respectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@firetube8288 Transphobe is a toothless cult term used to shut down speech, and seems to be used by you, for what the rest of the world refers to as common sense.
When men vote to eliminate women's rights by insisting they themselves are women, and that women need to just be quiet and take it, -- It looks like the ultimate display of misogyny.
Do you think women's showers, locker rooms, changing rooms, restrooms, sports leagues/teams, or prisons are designated as such based on a subjective gender identity claim, or perhaps it's based on biology?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Misgendering? Hateful?? There's nothing hateful about recognizing that someone is not that which they claim to be. It's merely being observant of objective reality.
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@krasmasov6852 What are you talking about? You've refuted nothing whatsoever, and neither has anyone else who's an activist or advocate-- such as yourself.
Bottom line, I have no dog in this fight. It's you who and the extreme minority in the world of trans-activists, who wish that I-- and the rest of the world affirm and validate your ideology by using your preferred pronouns, etc.-- but you fail to persuade, so the answer is-- No. It looks like you're owning yourself, by continuing to fail to persuade. You're a disingenuous troll, who's only shown yourself to be playing the part of a triggered fool
You've established nothing and have refuted even less.
Then there are the women's prisons, which now house violent, trans-women offenders ie. Men, who have raped and impregnated several female inmates, proving that they are not that which they claim to be-- ie. women, and how they identify has ZERO impact on the truth that men cannot become women, and women cannot become men
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yendyssss7945 Intentional or not, they do mock women, and displace them in sports, scholarships, restrooms, dressing rooms, showers,locker rooms, etc., by portraying themselves as caricatures of a women.
Woe, to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian futures-- they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will say they're women
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The main issue is that people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are in objective reality/Fact, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The stats show that raising kids in a conservative household results in well-balanced, happy, successful, and self-disciplined individuals. Cope Harder.
What you exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing you were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That you/they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's your/their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as you/they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 Yes, that's exactly what you said. When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately? I think it's only valuable if we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not."
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 Call them what you want. They're men caricaturing women, or women caricaturing men, some suffer with gender dysphoria, and others are just indulging their own kink, and/or desire to be counter-culture.
I recognize that they are not that which they claim to be or present themselves as, like it or not.
The fact is that the social norms are actually established currently, and a dude in a dress LARPing and engaging in cosplay are clearly not it, and even if they were-- it's still a dude in a dress not trans anything. They're the same exact sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after.
These dudes like Blossom are the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after they do.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lanacat-j2y I did, and you failed to prove me incorrect.
Let me expand-- Not all trans people suffer with dysphoria (OR, are you saying that they all do?), but they all do have a way higher risk of self deleting than the rest of the of the general population, so I see it as a more pressing underlying issue to address, than a mere matter of cosmetics.
The argument in favor of affirmative care is, if you don't let them transition that they'll self-delete. Well, they seem to do that even if you do let them transition, so as far as I'm concerned it's an invalid argument.
Not having coping mechanisms to deal with the adversity one faces in life is a psych issue, that surgery doesn't alleviate-- which begs the questioning of affirmation-based treatment protocols, along with the ethics of those who do
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thatoneclown4723 Yes, you did. Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories which are fixed and permanent.
You got it totally wrong on gender. Then, you conflate gender with personality. Then, you conflate gender and gender roles. Then you conflate men with women, males with females, science with science-fiction and fact with fiction.
A woman isn't a personality, costume, social construct, nor a feeling. She's an adult, human female.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@krasmasov6852 Only when speaking for yourself -- and then your choices are limited to I, Me, My-- unless you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person, which is pretty weird.
You should get a refund from your English grammar teachers.
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kylewilliams5454 Like I said, You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yup... Cis/Trans are used in chemistry, to determine the stability and certain placement of molecules; it has NOTHING to do with gender.
Gender and Personality-- They conflate the difference.
There's only one kind of woman, and they are all born females, so... using the cis prefix is totally redundant and unnecessary.
The entire ideological narrative is incoherent nonsense. They completely get it wrong on gender. Then they conflate gender and personality. Then, they conflate gender and gender roles. Then, they conflate what women are with men. smh
There are males and females. That's it! Men in drag are still men. A woman isn't a costume, personality or a social construct, and they act like she is. She's one half of the binary dichotomy of mammals specifically humans.
Only 2 facts are needed to settle the trans topic.
1. Your body and brain develop & grow together -> You simply can't be born in the wrong body.
2. Hating a functional part of you body so much, that you opt to cut it off, is a mental illness.
There are only males and females. Those are dudes in disguise. They aren't trans anything.
The prerequisite to being a woman is being born female, and those dudes were not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timsplosion NO, it makes it clear that they're attempting to look and act how they perceive their notion of what it is to be the opposite of their biology, looks like.
Not if men can be women, and women can be men-- there aren't. Perhaps, making an argument against the possibility of any gender pay gap is the logic?
I agree that it's psychological though. Pure fantasy and delusion disconnected from reality.
If gender isn't tied to biology, and gender is fluid and unfixed-- why the need for altering the biology, and adding costumes to add in the appearance of actually being the opposite biological sex, rather than just accepting the premise and just correctly identifying as they are? It's unsound thinking
I would suggest that if we go with your narrative that gender is not tied to biology, then the biology would be irrelevant, and the idea of transitioning biologically would be senseless. They could just pretend to be what they want. Expecting the rest of the universe to pretend they're a member of a sex that they are not if they believed their narrative--would make them, inconsistent at the very least.
They're not entitled to their own pronouns any more than I'm entitled to my own adjectives
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brendamartinez2236 I know... That's what I said; they're not synonymous w/ gender.
The point is, people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. How is that not a delusional, dissociative state, by definition?
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament (neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), as if or as though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@loturzelrestaurant Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CreativeUsernameEh Just seeing if anyone is paying attention.
Male and Female describe our physical traits aka biology.
Look, you can shove a chicken feather in your butt, and you're still not a chicken, and you have ZERO frame of reference as to how a chicken perceives anything at all, certainly not to be able to identify as a chicken.
You're a dude in a dress and makeup, Or a female attempting to alter your physical appearance to mask your female traits and replace them with male traits. But Getting a nose job has the same amount of impact on ones sex and gender as a sex change-- which is ZERO. They're still a female or a male... Just intentionally mutilated
Isn't it your side's narrative that gender isn't connected to biology? Well, then why the need to transition, or play dress up? crickets
You can put a castrated dog in a dress, and it's still a male dog in a dress. Just sayin...
Seems like your narrative is attempting to rename personality types, 'genders'. Well, That's wrong too
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasmynnmaleah7553 Why? Because I recognize that they are not that which they present themselves as, and I'm not willing to pretend I don't? That just makes me observant. I'm not addressing how I feel about them misgendering themselves, in the form of gender misappropriation of women.
I figure, woe to the feminists who buy into this ideological narrative-- as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim to be women, and they don't see it coming.
The cis prefix, that was being objected to, wasn't met with respect, so how should they then demand respect? Respect is earned, and is reserved for that which is respectable
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bdaarmy9736 There are people. People are male or female, respectively. Segments of each are born with or develop various physical issues, some with various psych issues and some with both-- NONE of which make it possible for a male to become a female or a female to become a male.
Gender (There are only 2 male/female... That's it). Too many inappropriately conflate gender with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys), as though they're synonymous, but they aren't.
A woman isn't a social construct, a feeling, or a costume. There is only 1 kind of woman, and they're ALL born female, making the use of trans/cis intellectually vacant and irrelevant
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The fact that the self-delete rates today are higher than they were prior to the implementation of affirmation-based treatment, and even after transition-- are nearly 40% higher than the general population, doesn't illustrate efficacious results, and on that basis I question the claims of the course of treatment being efficacious, as well as the ethics of those who endorse and perform those procedures.
The entire trans-activist ideological narrative is incoherent and falls into the realm of science-fiction, and pseudo-science-- and doesn't rise to the level of actual science
If 4 out of 10 parachutes fail, smart people wouldn't go skydiving, and it wouldn't be a surprise if those that did, went splat.
People with psych issues, so severe that they contemplate and attempt to self-delete-- aren't exactly well-balanced people, by default.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The solution already exists. The men use the men's room and women use the women's room. They aren't trans anything. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after they do.
Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The fact that the self-delete rates today are higher than they were prior to the implementation of affirmation-based treatment, and even after transition-- are nearly 40% higher than the general population, doesn't illustrate efficacious results, and on that basis I question the claims of the course of treatment being efficacious, as well as the ethics of those who endorse and perform those procedures.
The entire trans-activist ideological narrative is incoherent and falls into the realm of science-fiction, and pseudo-science-- and doesn't rise to the level of actual science
If 4 out of 10 parachutes fail, smart people wouldn't go skydiving, and it wouldn't be a surprise if those that did, went splat.
People with psych issues, so severe that they contemplate and attempt to self-delete-- aren't exactly well-balanced people, by default.
Surely, if it were possible to cure all psych illness and disorders-- there would be none. Alas, not all broken psyches of people are fixable-- and the answer isn't for the whole world's population to deny objective reality and pretend the LARP and cosplay is based in reality, for the sake of their feelings. Get Real! Think Again
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@miraculousk7547 Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GrahamChapman Kick Rocks Groomer. Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How so? I agree, however; likely for different reasons. Neither your anxiety about reality, your personality, your preferences, nor your fashion choices change your gender, and I suppose that might bug a group of guys pretending to be Cinderella for attention, but sometimes the truth stings.
All women are born female, all men are born male (ZERO exceptions), and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, personality, preference or a costume.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jenner only altered his appearance. Still male
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately?"
You said, "I think it's only valuable 'IF' we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not"
You want fully grown and fully capable adults to first be, "Taken care of" (?), to be "Supported"(?), to be provided care for (?), to be made happy (?), and "to be taken care of" (?)-- before life is considered valuable?
How self-entitled are you? wow... And who are these people who are supposed to be the adults in your perpetual state of adolescence, providing for you? Grow Up
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things you've said, and have made false allegations about things I've said-- many, many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying, So..... You're exposed as an antagonist, activist troll-- who has failed to make an argument with any integrity.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@conor.3875 If sex and gender are truly independent, then why do trans men and trans women go through so many hoops to change their primary sex characteristics??? You’re not trying to change your gender, you’re trying to change sex…. Make it make sense
WAY TOO Many are conflating sex/gender (There are only 2 male/female, and segments of each present with various physical issues, some with psych issues, some with both-- none of which alter the fact that their biology is male or female) with gender roles (These vary from culture to culture, country to country and society to society, BUT-- they all (without exception) refer to the roles of males and females in those cultures, countries, and societies) and personality (There are a ton, and NONE are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as if they're all synonymous, and they aren't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ryanthomas9306 Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CreoleWolf I have no stats to support your claim at all. That's why I asked you for them. You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.
The stats I have seen are from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders (DSM 5) and they are showing, "Among [biological males], approximately 0.005 percent to 0.014 percent are later diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Among [biological females], approximately 0.002 percent to 0.003 percent are later diagnosed with gender dysphoria.
Being that gender dysphoria is so extremely rare, according to the stats from the American Psychiatric Association-- Some would argue that Most trans people do not in fact suffer from true gender dysphoria, rather are merely unapologetically embracing their own perversions.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again... You can get a surgeon to alter your appearance to be like a Klingon from Star Trek, but it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and the same is true regarding gender reassignment surgery. It's XX, XY, Birth Defect. That's It. BTW, Intersex is not another gender, it's a birth defect.
Tell me more about your stats
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Care to elaborate? The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
They're merely caricatures of what they 'WISH' they were and can never be
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They're both dudes with issues, pretending that they're women without issues. What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@snailtrailgail Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
If the validity of one's identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then that identity is just not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Why would someone who believes they're a woman wish to have the 'trans' distinction drawn? That's Odd
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts??
1
-
@jessvalley6813 And you're incorrect. The total number of pregnancy related deaths was in 2020, there were almost 24 deaths per 100,000 births, or 861 deaths total — numbers that reflect mothers dying during pregnancy.
The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year.
Data for United States in 2020. Number of births: 3,613,647. Like I said, it's not only rare, it's EXTREMELY rare, meaning it's not common AT ALL.
You come across like a sociopath, driving an agenda
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 The Post conveyed criticisms alleged about two of those: “One study of Dutch children, in particular, assumed that subjects had ‘desisted’ purely because they stopped showing up to a gender identity clinic.” Although unnamed, the claim appears to be referring to Steensma et al. (2013), which followed up on 127 transgender kids. Of them: 47 said they were still transgender; 56 said they were no longer transgender (46 said so directly, 6 said so via their parents, and 4 more said so despite not participating in other aspects of the study); and 24 did not respond to the invitation to participate in the study or could not be located. Because all the medical services for transition are free in the Netherlands and because there is only one clinic providing those services, the researchers were able to check that none of the 24 had actually transitioned despite having the opportunity to do so. Steensma therefore reported that (80/127 =) 63% of the cases desisted. The alleged criticism is that one should not assume that the 24 who did not respond or could not be found were desisters. Regardless of whether one agrees with that, the irrelevance of claim is clearly seen simply by taking it to its own conclusion: When one excludes these 24, one simply finds a desistance rate of (56/103 =) 54% instead of 63%. That is, although numerically lower, it nonetheless supports the very same conclusion as before. The majority of kids cease to feel transgender when they get older.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If it is-- that gender is socially malleable or a social construct, how does it coexist side by side with the proposition that the girl who's trapped in a male body-- has an immutable male identity? It's incoherent -- or that only the individual themselves can determine their gender identity-- if it's a social construct, how does that work?? Again, It's incoherent
If it were true, that gender is a social construct, fluid, and malleable and not biological-- why the need to transition biologically, or play dress up, and change their physical appearance? Again, incoherent
They're already, who they are to themselves, and the proclivity to alter their biology, suggests that gender is NOT separate from biology. Why the desire to change if gender is merely a social construct? Again, it's incoherent
No, It's XX, XY, Birth defect or evidence that a psych evaluation and treatment be considered, and btw-- the exceptions to the rules do not invalidate the rules. They validate them, hence being the exceptions
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@amylomo9793 The narrative is inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament, neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys, with gender.
Gender addresses the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male and female are biological categories which are fixed and permanent.
When challenged on the beliefs that skirts, dresses, heels, makeup, hormones, surgery and literally the color pink, nor their fanciful imaginations make them women-- they tend to get unhinged even further, when confronted by the fact that their delusional nonsense is rejected, in favor of reality.
1
-
@amylomo9793 That isn't much of a refutation, but it is a lot of gaslighting far from anything resembling an intellectual rebuttal, or at the very least-- establishing your case.
Respect is earned, and is reserved for that which is respectable.
Those demanding preferred pronoun use on the part of others, in defiance of objective reality, and affirmations from others that they perceive them as they perceive themselves-- is the height of arrogance and narcissism.
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance and prescribe hormones, to make you look like a Klingon from Star Trek, but it doesn't actually make you a Klingon, and if you think it does-- it makes you delusional.
It's XX, XY, birth defect, psych disorder... That's it. Take your pick
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
True gender dysphoria is very rare, and I believe the trans-activist ideology and narratives are inappropriately grouping trans people, who are for the most part, merely unapologetically embracing and indulging their perversions-- under the gender dysphoria umbrella. It's disingenuous at BEST
Liberals want to give your children hormone blockers, inject them with poison, shame them for their skin color, teach them to be gay, allow them to be groomed by pedophiles and give control of them over to the state.
The sad part is that I don't have to exaggerate these claims.
They openly support this evil.
You are watching the death spiral of the Democratic party.
To the feminists who go along with their incoherent ideology-- Best of luck in your near dystopian future, where you'll then be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will say they're women too. And they don't even see it coming. Don't say, no one ever told you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No... The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 When asked by HK 4lyfe if you believe all life is valuable -- you said, "All human life? Definitely not. Lol. Have you seen the world lately? I think it's only valuable if we make it just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of than we do to simply enforce more births, which we do not."
No worries. I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things you've said and about things you've alleged I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thecolorblue1635 You're coming off as triggered, making comments which appear designed to attack rather than engage in a civil discourse. You refuted nothing whatsoever in your virtue signaling rant. The trouble is-- there's no virtue in your attacks. Shocker
They're trying to rename personality traits, "Gender", as if they're interchangeable. They're wrong.
To ALL the feminists who go along to get along, I wish you well in the coming situation, where as a feminist-- You'll be living under the tyranny of men, thinking and saying that they are women while they add to your competition in the workplace, take over women's sports, locker rooms, restrooms and showers, as well as in prisons.
They're trying to turn womanhood into a costume that can be worn like a disguise. You'll see, and when they do-- don't say nobody told you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gabriellevitale4670 You sure are doing a lot of mental gymnastics to ignore the fact that the child which is in the womb is there because the mother facilitated herself becoming pregnant, when choosing to risk an unwanted pregnancy, by engaging in the one and only act which causes her avoidable dilemma. It is a living, developing human-- unlike a bacteria, so you fail to justify terminating the life of the innocent.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
Women know that they are the ones who get pregnant, and can choose to risk it or not.
The smart ones tend to wait until they're ready to have and raise their own-- to conceive. What do you think they know that the others, who have difficulty with their preventative birth control, don't?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well Mom, No one with a functioning prefrontal cortex thinks that getting a tattoo or piercing their ears changes their gender.
The pronoun use-- because it's false.
They're trying to rename personality traits, "Gender", as if they're interchangeable. They're wrong.
To ALL the feminists who go along to get along, I wish you well in the coming situation, where as a feminist-- You'll be living under the tyranny of men, thinking and saying that they are women while they add to your competition in the workplace, take over women's sports, locker rooms, restrooms and showers, as well as in prisons.
They're trying to turn womanhood into a costume that can be worn like a disguise. You'll see, and when they do-- don't say nobody told you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ethandollarhide7943 Look, they can identify as a Klingon for all I care (I don't at all), and then have a surgeon alter their appearance to look like a Klingon, and it wouldn't make them a Klingon, and those who said it did would be delusional too.
Way too many, inappropriately and incorrectly conflate Gender (There are only 2 male/female... That's it) with gender roles (social constructs which refer to the roles of males and females in society), and personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive--hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as though they're synonymous and they are not, leading to their incoherent conclusions and narratives which simply do not withstand scrutiny.
A dude in a wig and a dress is still a dude, even if he really believes his LARP and cosplay is real.
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 It's irrelevant. There is only 1 kind of woman and they're all born female.
The problem with the trans activist ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TorbieGinger Gender-- There are 2, male/female... That's it
Pretending you're something or someone you're not, doesn't make you that thing in reality. It means you're engaged in cosplay and LARPing. Fr@udulent identities aren't valid anywhere
Personality traits and temperament are not gender exclusive, hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys. Get a clue
As it turns out, the prerequisite to being a woman is being born female and those dudes weren't. A woman isn't a costume men can put on and take off, and they aren't a social construct, or a feeling. A woman is an adult, human, female. Now, you know
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheLegendOfRandy Your analogy is flawed. You didn't, in the analogy-- "choose to get t-boned". You chose to "risk driving", KNOWING that there is a risk of an accident while driving.
That's why you have to have insurance, which first of all covers others-- in the event that the accident is YOUR fault, then you have additionally added coverage to insure yourself against irresponsible drivers, who are uninsured.
When it comes to driving. You have insurance, because you know there's risk and you already accept it, by default-- evidenced by you having insurance, and again, when you choose to drive. You KNOW there's a chance you'll get in a wreck. Does that mean you're not entitled to medical treatment in the event of a collision, of course not. Your argument is lame.
When it comes to knowing that you don't want to risk pregnancy, It's TOTALLY up to YOU whether you risk it or not. It's also up to you on how big of a risk it is, based on your precautions or lack thereof-- as the case may be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People identifying as something they're not, and believing that somehow it transforms reality-- is what's wild.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
The problem you have is that life is based in objective reality, which exposes your narratives, as intellectually vacant.
Women aren't a social construct, feeling, preference, nor a costume. Women (ALL of them) are born female with zero exceptions.
Choosing to call an apple an orange, doesn't alter the nature of an apple nor an orange. Your preferences re: s3xu@l matters don't alter whether or not you're male or female, and neither does choosing self mutil@tion or castration.
The thing is, societies which have been long established, and steeped in tradition aren't obligated to abandon their established cultural norms to support a counter-culture ideology. To suggest that they owe it to you is the height of narcissism and arrogance.
It's for YOU to integrate into the society which you choose to be in, not for them to change for you. Sheesh....
That sound you're hearing is the sound of rejection from the vast majority of the people on earth, of the trans-activist, ideological, cult narratives.
Nobody owes you. Cope Harder
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PKMNFan4664 And... You'd be Wrong. The 1965 Voting Rights Act was signed into law. Contrary to myth, Republicans supported this law much more than did the Democrats. In the Senate, 94% of Republicans voted in favor, while just 73% of Democrats voted for it.
• The Dem party was the party of the Dixiecrats all the way through the 60’s.
• If what the flawed narrative suggested were true-- that the blacks made a switch to their racial friends, it would appear the switch would have to come in the 70’s and the 80’s-- When blacks see the racists are switching, BUT—in reality blacks switched overwhelmingly in the 1930’s.
• The Black Vote went from about 15% to about 75% democrat within about 4 years.
• The reason blacks switched from R to D’s had everything to do with the New Deal.
• Blacks in the North and the South switched to the Dem party because of New Deal Benefits
Redefining terms is what they do, to cause the confusion making it easier to serve up revisionist history to the ignorant, during their indoctrination (K-12, and continued into "higher learning").
Many have been led to believe that the political spectrum places groups such as Communists on the far left and Fascists or Dictators on the far right and political moderates or centrists in the middle;
However, a more accurate political spectrum will show government having ZERO power on the far right, and having Total government power on the far left.
At the extreme Right there is NO government, at the extreme Left there is TOTAL government under such labels as Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Fascism, Princes, Potentates, Dictators, Kings-- ANY form of TOTAL government.
Those who claim Nazis and Fascists are right wing never define their terms. This amounts to spreading confusion.
Toward the middle of the political spectrum can be found the type of government, limited to it's proper role of protecting the rights of the people. That's where the Constitution of the USA is., and those who advocate for such a form of government are really Constitutional moderates.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 If a mother's life is in imminent peril and nothing is done, she and the fetus/baby perish-- as it cannot survive at the 20 week +/- marker, outside of the mother-- for the VAST majority-- when those decisions typically required to be made, and so seems to be in a not dissimilar category as suffering a miscarriage, as it goes to the fate of the unborn's termination. How is it not?
Why do you appear to have a problem with women being able to save their lives?
Looks like it Sucks to be you.
Once again, you didn't comprehend a single response given.
If you don't care about a woman's culpability in preventing her own unwanted pregnancy, why and how does, as you've done continually-- pointing to a man's contribution matter? It's not like she could get pregnant, if she didn't facilitate and enable her own risk factors and ensuing dilemma.
What do you think she needs to figure out, that millions of other women seem to have figured out-- related to avoiding their unwanted pregnancy's?
Why does personal accountability and responsibility appear to trigger a response from you that looks like desperation, as you try to reassign blame and avoid a woman's personal accountability at any cost, in her role of facilitating her unwanted pregnancy?
You've failed to explain your thoughts adequately.
How do you continually fail to account for those facts and factor them into your analysis and conclusions?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@showithere8550 You wrote, "3.5% is still quite a lot of people, than any other group of people especially, that's still quite concerning 😟🤔. Poor white guys. I wonder what's the issue?
the bottom line is, most people struggle with mental issues whether they are aware of it or not, or whether they get help for it or not. You using a statistic of a small group of trans people having mental problems is not the flex you thought it was. Try again."-- Then I guess you're blocking me, because your comment and my replies are not showing up when I reply. Whatever...
Not when you look at it in proportion to the 40% of those in the LGBTQ community, and realize that of the 3% of the total population, only a small fraction of them are LGBTQ, but then-- I realize that, "It's usually futile to talk Facts and Analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority, in their ignorance". -- T. Sowell
No, most people don't struggle with mental illness, but all people struggle with difficulties. There's a significant difference with how the two comparatively-- face their trials and challenges
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 So confirmation bias is what you seek? Wrong guy here. I've made my case why I believe I'm correct and you are not. You, on the other hand, have not made yours.
EVEN IF I agree that gender and sex are not connected (I don't)-- You STILL haven't explained how it is that those biological men are justified in being granted access into women's private spaces-- since you admit that you believe that sex isn't affected by or connected to gender, it doesn't make sense to say that trans women are women.
Do you have any original thoughts on the challenges I brought up about your point of view, definitions and disjointed absence of logic in your narratives? If not-- We'll leave it at agreeing to disagree
Then you better hope those who you're putting your faith in graduated at the top of their class, but still-- the results of their approach are horrendous evidenced by the number of self deletions that occur, even after transition are relatively unchanged from those who haven't yet undergone their treatment protocols, BUT-- be sure to get your 20th booster and go run some laps.
FYI, and fwiw-- Science isn't a consensus.
Oh, and regarding curling up in a hole in the ground-- That isn't very lady-like.
I'm a gentleman, so You 1st
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 I don't expect you to admit to the truth, as you've lied about things I've said many many times, and the comments are all there to validate what I'm saying.
I mean it isn't as if you haven't proven that you argue and agitate at every opportunity for sport, while disingenuously engaging in what I'd compare to a phone scammer's ethics, with a politician's evasiveness, failing to ever directly answer a question honestly.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Just pointing out the incoherent things you've said-- and you are desperate to avoid it-- The truth is not subject to your admission, nor your denial.
You writing that not all lives are valuable, qualifying-- "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of" (in other words) unless they are sufficiently charitable to a level of your satisfaction, is patently absurd and the amount of ego behind that is unreal. Your narcissism is off-the-hook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just some perspective: The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
They're merely caricatures of what they 'WISH' they were, and can never be
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 Gender is Binary, Male and Female. It's not an issue. The only issue is people w/ psych disorders -- who don't live in reality about there being two genders.
XX, XY, Birth Defect, That's it! MANY are inappropriately conflating the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with 'gender'.
There are clearly males and females with various biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries, etc.-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon from Star Trek and prescribe hormones etc... and it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and those who think it does are delusional.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Roxana Blacksea Nah... Not even close. From the dawn of time-- Freedom hasn't been the norm and both men and women have had to struggle just to stay alive, under the oppressive rule of Kings, Pharaohs, Chiefs, Potentates, Emperors, Amirs, Prime Ministers, Presidents, etc...
"Socialism has a history of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it".-- T. Sowell
Facts are awesome and stubborn things. Life isn't fair
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. Not reasonable or rational by any standard.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bathrooms, showers, locker rooms, dressing rooms, changing rooms, prisons are designed and implemented around biology.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He doesn't use 'they/them' when speaking to his friend. That would be grammatically incorrect. He uses their name.
Only when speaking for yourself -- and then your choices are limited to I, Me, My-- unless you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person, which is pretty weird.
You should get a refund from your English grammar teachers.
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheLegendOfRandy Ya, that doesn't justify terminating the innocent.
Don't want to risk a pregnancy? Alright, then don't.
If women offer themselves up to men for sex, they are the catalyst for their own avoidable dilemma.
The intellectual gymnastics that you're going through to avoid recognizing the responsibly that women have for their own actions is stunning.
Women know what causes pregnancy, and have no one to blame for their unwanted pregnancy but themselves, when they facilitate the one and only act which causes their avoidable dilemma
I expect that people who aren't prepared to risk pregnancy and deal with the consequences avoid them, and for someone with some integrity to inform them that the world doesn't owe them a life, free from adversity.
Women know that they are the ones who get pregnant, and can "choose" to risk it or not.
The smart ones tend to wait until they're ready to have and raise their own-- to conceive.
What do you think they know that the others, who have difficulty with their preventative birth control, don't?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jhon Dalton Well, you can neuter your male dog, put him in a dress, put bows in his hair, paint his wittle paw nails etc., and he's still a male dog.
Who said we had to play along? fr-- The whole preferred pronouns insistence thing, granting those men access to women's Sports, Sports teams, Locker rooms, Restrooms, Showers, and Prisons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec3733 Don't pretend that you aren't aware that I didn't mean getting themselves pregnant-- "by themselves", or that I was addressing cases of rape. Sheesh...🙄
They are the ones risking getting their body's pregnant, when they choose to engage in the one and only act which actually causes the totally avoidable unwanted pregnancy in the 1st place.
You said, not all lives are valuable since they're not making life "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of".
Therefore, you believe that not all women's lives are valuable.
That indicates that you believe not all women would or should then necessarily be entitled to bodily autonomy considerations, since they're not making their own baby's lives (You know-- the ones they facilitated when they chose to risk pregnancy, by choosing to risk engaging in the one and only act which actually causes their unwanted pregnancies and dilemmas) "just as valuable to be supported, cared for, happy and taken care of"???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Only when speaking for yourself -- and then your choices are limited to I, Me, My-- unless you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person, which is pretty weird.
You should get a refund from your English grammar teachers.
You don't get to choose the one's that others use, when speaking about you to someone else.
1st person pronouns are grouped into 5 categories: Subject pronouns 1st person "I", Object pronouns 1st person "Me", possessive adjectives 1st person "My", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Mine", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Myself"
2nd person: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourself"
3rd person (Male): Subject pronouns 3rd person "He", Object pronouns 3rd person "Him", possessive adjectives 3rd person "His", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "His", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Himself"
3rd person (Female): Subject pronouns 3rd person "She", Object pronouns 3rd person "Her", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Her", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Hers", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Herself"
3rd Thing: Subject pronouns 3rd thing "It", Object pronouns 3rd thing "It", possessive adjectives 3rd thing "Its", Possessive pronouns 3rd thing "Not Used", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd thing "Itself"
1st person plural: Subject pronouns "We", Object pronouns 1st person "Us", possessive adjectives 1st person "Our", Possessive pronouns 1st person "Ours", and Reflexive pronouns 1st person "Ourselves"
2nd person plural: Subject pronouns 2nd person "You", Object pronouns 2nd person "You", possessive adjectives 2nd person "Your", Possessive pronouns 2nd person "Yours", and Reflexive pronouns 2nd person "Yourselves"
3rd person and (thing) plural: Subject pronouns "They", Object pronouns "Them", possessive adjectives 3rd person "Their", Possessive pronouns 3rd person "Theirs", and Reflexive pronouns 3rd person "Themselves".
Now stop embarrassing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@OHOHOHOOHOHOOOHOOHOHO The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
If one's identity is predicted on the notion that all of society must recognize you as you perceive yourself, contrary to objective reality-- Then that identity isn't valid.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 You indicted that the law might change if I cry harder, as though it is a matter of law everywhere, and that the failure to affirm someone's subjective identity is illegal-- and It isn't.
We can agree to disagree.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. That's insane
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariec7352 If a mother's life is in imminent peril and nothing is done, she and the fetus/baby perish-- as it cannot survive at the 20 week +/- marker, outside of the mother-- for the VAST majority-- when those decisions typically required to be made, and so seems to be in a not dissimilar category as suffering a miscarriage, as it goes to the fate of the unborn's termination. How is it not?
Why do you appear to have a problem with women being able to save their lives?
Looks like it Sucks to be you.
Once again, you didn't comprehend a single response given.
If you don't care about a woman's culpability in preventing her own unwanted pregnancy, why and how does, as you've done continually-- pointing to a man's contribution matter? It's not like she could get pregnant, if she didn't facilitate and enable her own risk factors and ensuing dilemma.
What do you think she needs to figure out, that millions of other women seem to have figured out-- related to avoiding their unwanted pregnancy's?
Why does personal accountability and responsibility appear to trigger a response from you that looks like desperation, as you try to reassign blame and avoid a woman's personal accountability at any cost, in her role of facilitating her unwanted pregnancy?
You've failed to explain your thoughts adequately.
How do you continually fail to account for those facts and factor them into your analysis and conclusions?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 And?? Not ANY trans women can give birth.
I don't hate men, and those who you're referring to as transgender women, are men.
Gender and sex aren't disconnected.
Gender is NOT a social construct. You can stomp your feet about it all you want and it changes nothing.
Gender roles are the social constructs and they're well-established, which is why the counter-culture trans-narrative is itself the real construct and you seem unable to process that distinction.
Your inability to process the truth of it, doesn't invalidate the truth.
We're not going to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that we can promote make believe, or cater to feelings. NO! Just... No
They're still men
Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior and personality traits.
Cry about it,and argue about it-- if you must. It matters not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because that doesn't address the root issue. It does nothing about women's locker rooms, showers, dressing rooms, sports, sport teams, scholarships, women's prisons or women's rights. Woe, to the feminists who buy into this ideological narrative, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by men, who will claim to be women-- and they don't even see it coming
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 I'm not sure why you think, pointing out the inconsistency within your narratives is somehow evidence of me being upset. It looks again, like you're trying to be edgy, provocative, and argue for argument's sake.
If you want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
You can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If your subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then your identity is not valid.
Nonetheless, my observations regarding your comments are that you have not illustrated any respect for women and their private spaces by advocating in favor of men being allowed to infiltrate their spaces.
Why, according to you-- should men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Neither anxiety about reality, personality, preferences, nor fashion choices change anyone's gender, and I suppose that might bug a group of guys pretending to be Cinderella for attention, but sometimes the truth stings.
All women are born female, all men are born male (ZERO exceptions), and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, personality, or a costume.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheLegendOfRandy No, that's not correct.
Don't want to get into a car accidents, So-- drive very carefully, and don't drive uninsured, because there are other motorists who are morons out there.
If you know you're a terrible driver with a horrible driving record-- you're the hazard to yourself and others
Look, the odds are-- if you go looking for trouble, you'll find it.
Naturally, if you don't want to get into a bar fight, not going to bars is the guaranteed solution to work. That doesn't mean you cannot go to a bar, but it means you know and assume the risk yourself, if you do-- does it not?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1