Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Trans vs Conservative Women: Are Periods Essential to Womanhood? | Middle Ground" video.
-
267
-
207
-
127
-
126
-
75
-
69
-
65
-
65
-
48
-
47
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
@celetial3287 Gender is Binary, Male and Female. It's not an issue. The only issue is people w/ psych disorders -- who don't live in reality about there being two genders.
XX, XY, Birth Defect, That's it! MANY are inappropriately conflating the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with 'gender'.
There are clearly males and females with various biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries, etc.-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon from Star Trek and prescribe hormones etc... and it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and those who think it does are delusional.
35
-
34
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
23
-
23
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@ezekielmatta They're arguing that he isn't that which he claims to be. That's just being observant of objective reality. They're the same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after they do. They're LARPing, at BEST
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
9
-
@insektas No, Gender and sex are intrinsically linked. They are not disconnected. Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
You're conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as though they're synonymous with gender-- and they are not.
We're suppose to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that we can promote make believe? Why??
I maintain that gender is not a social construct, or separate from biology. Gender roles are the construct, and so too is the transgender narrative-- a mere social construct, based in subjective lunacy, not reality.
Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior traits. I mean... C'mon now. It's ludicrous
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@fruitguzzi9122 The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or more physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@LouisDiCorzo The presumption of fear seems odd.
Gender is Binary, Male and Female. It's not an issue. The only issue is people w/ psych disorders -- who don't live in reality about there being two genders.
XX, XY, Birth Defect, That's it! MANY are inappropriately conflating the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with 'gender'.
There are clearly males and females with various biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries, etc.-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon from Star Trek and prescribe hormones etc... and it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and those who think it does are delusional.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
If you want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
You can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women, or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If your subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then your identity is not valid.
How does advocating in favor of men infiltrating women's private spaces, show any respect or consideration for women and their private spaces???
Why, according to you-- should men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
He has NO case. The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@markusbaker1161 I know, I wrote it. The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@seandevlin4051 The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Liberty5024 Facts are awesome and stubborn things. The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The point is, people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. How is that not a delusional, dissociative state, by definition?
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament (neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), as if or as though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
They teach their kids to use firearms properly, to wait to have children until they're married, and tend to have their insurance handled without tax payer subsidies. What are you talking about?
The point here is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Conversation Topic: Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too. Agree? Why? Disagree? Why?
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yup. The problem with the trans activist ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
Gender (There are only 2 male/female). Too many conflate gender with personality (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tom boys), and with gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society and without exception they ALL relate to the roles of males and females in those cultures, societies, and countries which all have long-established cultural norms, as though they're all synonymous-- and they are not.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Maksie0 No, a woman is an adult, human, female-- and womanhood isn't a costume which men can put on and become women. smh
You've refuted nothing whatsoever, and have not justified allowing men to infiltrate women's private places, like locker rooms, sports teams, restrooms, and prisons, because of their subjective identity claims.
Why do you hate, and disrespect women so much?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markusbaker1161 You have no respect for women, facts nor truth. I don't care about your opinion or your feelings.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Stereotypes exist for a reason. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Gender is Not a social construct. Gender roles are social constructs, and they refer to the roles of males and females-- without exception.
Way too many inappropriately conflate Gender/sex (There are only 2 male/female... That's it) with Personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country and society to society and without exception they're all long-established cultural norms, regarding the roles of males and females in those cultures, countries, and societies) as though they're all synonymous- and they are not.
All women are born female, all men are born male and neither are social constructs, fetishes, feelings or costumes
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Too many are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
They're Re-defining things so their ideological activist narrative appears to be based in objective reality, but it just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects associated with being male or female, respectively.
If/when they want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
They can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing relevant but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If their subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then that identity is not valid-- as far as I'm concerned, and none have persuaded me that it is, or even that it should be.
Nonetheless, my observations regarding so many of the comments of the trans-activists, are that they have not illustrated any respect for women or their private spaces by advocating in favor of men being allowed to infiltrate their spaces.
They can't answer why men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markusbaker1161 The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markusbaker1161 Don't be triggered. Your aversion to anything that isn't rooted in confirmation bias is showing.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@empresscrafts689 Like I said, Male and female are biological categories which are fixed and permanent.
All they're doing is altering their appearance and body chemistry.
Identities which conflict with biology, are those of people w/ various psych issues who are delusional, and dissociative-- by definition.
Affirming that individual's dissociative state as valid isn't justified, nor helpful-- evidenced by the stats showing that they have a self-termination rate nearly 10x's higher than the accounted for norm, even after they alter their appearance.
They're not 'Trans' ANYTHING whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are-- after.
The societal and cultural aspects that you're referring to, are those of personality traits and temperament (which aren't gender exclusive-- hence butch females, effeminate males, and tomboys).
No, for those reasons the incoherent activist ideology and narratives don't pass scrutiny.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dogenjoyer2480 Ya, because regardless or choosing to chemically castrate themselves, and / or alter their physical appearance, or claiming a subjective gender identity, and choosing to wear a dress, portraying a stereotypical caricature of the opposite sex-- they're men.
ALL men are born male, all women are born female and that state is fixed and permanent as it is with all mammalian species-- and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, preference, personality trait or temperament, or a costume.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ElanaVital83 Their capacity for logic, reason, critical thinking, and intelligent analytical capacity is impaired so severely-- that expecting them to reach intellectually sound conclusions isn't in and of itself logical or reasonable.
I mean, they can't grasp the fact that the prerequisite to being a woman is being born female.
They totally get it wrong on gender. Then, they conflate personality with gender. Then, they conflate gender, temperament and personality with gender and gender roles. Then, they conflate males with females. Then, they conflate men with women. Then, they conflate reality with imaginary fiction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jupiterfox7683 If as you suggest, gender and sex aren't connected (That's incorrect)-- justify those biological men being granted access to women's private spaces. You can't because they aren't. I already told you,quit conflating gender with personality. They aren't synonymous.
Look, Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and relates to the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Cis/Trans are used in chemistry, to determine the stability and certain placement of molecules; it has NOTHING to do with gender. Gender and Personality-- They haven't learned the difference.
There's only one kind of woman, and they are all born females, so... using the cis prefix is totally redundant and unnecessary.
The entire ideological narrative is incoherent nonsense. They completely get it wrong on gender. Then they conflate gender and personality. Then, they conflate gender and gender roles. Then, they conflate what women are with men. smh
There are males and females. That's it! Men in drag are still men.
A woman isn't a costume, personality or a social construct; She's one half of the binary dichotomy of mammals-- specifically, humans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@briannachilders772 You obviously don't know what that word 'bigot' means either. There's no hate involved in recognizing that they are not that which they claim to be. It's just an observation.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 Of that, I have No doubt. Really?? Research the following:
Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review
32 studies were examined for a total of 3463 patients screened. Thirty-two studies met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated, and references were manually reviewed in order to include additional relevant studies in this review. Female-to-male (FtM) surgery and male-to-female (MtF) surgery was discussed in 23 and 10 studies, respectively. One study discussed both. Varying patterns of complications were observed in FtM and MtF surgeries, with increased complications in the former because of the larger size of the neourethra. Meatal stenosis is a particular concern in MtF surgery, with complication rates ranging from 4 to 40%, and usually require meatotomy for repair. Stricture and fistulization are frequently reported complications following FtM surgery. In studies reporting on fistulae involving the urethra, 19–54% of fistulae resolved spontaneously without further surgical intervention. High rates of complications are reported in the current literature, which should be understood by patients and practitioners alike. Shared decision making with patients regarding incidence and management of urethral complications including stricture disease and fistulae, particularly after FtM surgery, is critical for setting expectations and managing postoperative outcomes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
They're merely caricatures of what they 'WISH' they were and can never be
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
@anniebananie416 I absolutely agree. Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men-- who will say they're women... And they don't even see it coming. I don't get it
I mean, Gender and sex aren't disconnected.
Gender is NOT a social construct.
Gender roles are the social constructs and they're well-established, which is why the counter-culture trans-narrative is itself the real construct and they seem unable to process that distinction.
Their inability to process the truth of it, doesn't invalidate the truth.
I'm not going to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that I can promote make believe, or cater to feelings. NO! Just... No
They're still men
Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior and personality traits.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 Poor baby, can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy. Your arguments and ideological narratives are incoherent nonsense.
You've been thoroughly discredited to my satisfaction, and you've done nothing but make a spectacle of yourself by making demonstrably false statements. It's rather p@thetic on your part.
There are no "trans" people. There are only human people, and humans are males or females, respectively... That's it, there are exactly ZERO exceptions
Cis/trans are terms used by cult activists to pretend that not all men are born male, and to pretend that not all women are female-- BUT they are
You Fail to persuade
It is the trans-activists like you, who's insistence that others-- who are already minding their own business, participate in your LARP and cosplay, by insisting on the grammatically incorrect use of pronouns, and with no regard for the displacement of women's privacy, which is at the root of how you brought your business to everyone in public, making it their business. Irony or idiocy? Quit your whining. You look and sound ridiculous
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What's the rational for that hypothesis?
Middle ground, to what end?
Is there a middle ground between objective reality and the potential number of infinite, subjective individual claims of 'identity'-- which happen to to be objectively false?
The inappropriate conflation of personality traits and temperament, neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys-- with gender, is causing a lot of confusion.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively, and male and female are in fact biological categories which are fixed and permanent.
I posit that there isn't trans anything. You're still the same sex/gender prior to altering your appearance, as you are after, and if gender is fluid-- why the need to change??
It's like extreme LARPing/cosplay to people who recognize that you are not that which you claim to identify as and/or present yourself as.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@knithearts I'm a retired Behavior Modification Specialist, and am fully aware of the condition.
Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of one's identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then that identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nkkenlken3220 Quit conflating Gender (There are only 2 male/female), with Personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive--hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (ALL refer to the roles of males and females in society, ALL are steeped in tradition, with long-standing historical context based in reality, and vary from culture to culture, society to society and country to country), as though they're all synonymous. They simply aren't.
A woman isn't a social construct, feeling or a costume. Women (ALL of them)are born female, making the use of cis/trans intellectually stunted, useless and totally irrelevant.
Now you know better
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Speaking of facts-- The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are factually, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 What??? You're the one who tries to make silly distinctions, by insisting that sex and gender are separate and disconnected-- Not me. I disagree. I am just trying to have a clear understanding of what you were asking.
Science says, People are biological beings, existing in objective reality. They are categorized scientifically as humans, and humans are mammals, and all mammals are all male or female, respectively-- as is the binary dichotomy of ALL mammals.
People (Males and females) create social constructs. Social constructs don't create people (Males and females).
Social constructs don't alter biology, so calling trans women-- women is grammatically incorrect, as it would be to use a she/her pronoun for a male who's only female in their imagination. Don't get me wrong,you're free to play along if you choose, but in reality-- still men
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nerd5 1. Genetics/DNA XX, XY, Birth Defect, and There are clearly males and females with several biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are A-sexual w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem with the trans activist ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
Gender (There are only 2 male/female). Too many conflate gender with personality (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tom boys), and with gender roles (Which vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society and without exception they ALL relate to the roles of males and females in those cultures, societies, and countries which all have long-established cultural norms, as though they're all synonymous-- and they are not.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 Some synonyms for caricature are: parody, joke, cartoon, sham, farce, mockery... Take your pick, either way-- they're not women and never will be.
If men aren't suffering from gender dysphoria and they dress like, and present as women, they're just engaging in cosplay.
Coincidentally, if they do suffer w/ gender dysphoria, their dissociative delusions don't transform them into women, either
Same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after they do. They're nothing more than a cheap knockoff of the genuine article.
Too bad, So sad
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, they inappropriately and incorrectly conflate personality traits and temperament neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys, with gender as if they're synonymous and they aren't. Then, they conflate gender and gender roles. Them, they conflate gender with s3xu@l preference. Then, they conflate males with females, men with women, science with science-fiction and pseudo science, and finally reality with fantasy. Their entire ideological narrative is incoherent madness.
There's only 1 kind of woman, and they're ALL born female, making the cis prefix totally irrelevant and useless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Domino454545 Their imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate. Those who are in a dissociative state, don't dictate what is acceptable or normal to those who aren't suffering with those sorts of psych issues
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 I recognize that they are not that which they claim to be or present themselves as, like it or not.
The fact is that the social norms are actually established currently, and a dude in a dress LARPing and engaging in cosplay are clearly not it, and even if they were-- it's still a dude in a dress not trans anything. They're the same exact sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after.
These dudes like Blossom are the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after they do.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Roxana Blacksea It's XX, XY, Birth Defect, Psych Disorder. That's it!
Like I said, If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
You've failed to refute that, and the 'because you said so' standard has been issued zero credibility, as you've failed to persuade.
You seem to inappropriately be conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament-- (neither of which are gender exclusive, hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboy) with gender.
I mean, you can identify as a Klingon for all I care, but that doesn't make it so; So-- how are they, who think it does Not delusional and detached from reality evidenced by their clearly dissociative state???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@_trevorbutler_ Quit conflating gender-- there are 2 (Male/female), with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and None are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys), and gender roles-- as though they're synonymous. They Aren't.
Gender refers to the sex observed and documented at birth, and also refers to the social aspects (Gender Roles-- which vary from country to country, society to society, and culture to culture. They are long established, and steeped in tradition-- BUT, they all relate to males and females) of being male or female, respectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Misgendering? Hateful?? There's nothing hateful about recognizing that someone is not that which they claim to be. It's merely being observant of objective reality.
Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yendyssss7945 Intentional or not, they do mock women, and displace them in sports, scholarships, restrooms, dressing rooms, showers,locker rooms, etc., by portraying themselves as caricatures of a women.
Woe, to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian futures-- they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will say they're women
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The main issue is that people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are in objective reality/Fact, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The stats show that raising kids in a conservative household results in well-balanced, happy, successful, and self-disciplined individuals. Cope Harder.
What you exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing you were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That you/they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's your/their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as you/they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 Call them what you want. They're men caricaturing women, or women caricaturing men, some suffer with gender dysphoria, and others are just indulging their own kink, and/or desire to be counter-culture.
I recognize that they are not that which they claim to be or present themselves as, like it or not.
The fact is that the social norms are actually established currently, and a dude in a dress LARPing and engaging in cosplay are clearly not it, and even if they were-- it's still a dude in a dress not trans anything. They're the same exact sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after.
These dudes like Blossom are the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance as they are after they do.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of their identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then their identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lanacat-j2y I did, and you failed to prove me incorrect.
Let me expand-- Not all trans people suffer with dysphoria (OR, are you saying that they all do?), but they all do have a way higher risk of self deleting than the rest of the of the general population, so I see it as a more pressing underlying issue to address, than a mere matter of cosmetics.
The argument in favor of affirmative care is, if you don't let them transition that they'll self-delete. Well, they seem to do that even if you do let them transition, so as far as I'm concerned it's an invalid argument.
Not having coping mechanisms to deal with the adversity one faces in life is a psych issue, that surgery doesn't alleviate-- which begs the questioning of affirmation-based treatment protocols, along with the ethics of those who do
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yup... Cis/Trans are used in chemistry, to determine the stability and certain placement of molecules; it has NOTHING to do with gender.
Gender and Personality-- They conflate the difference.
There's only one kind of woman, and they are all born females, so... using the cis prefix is totally redundant and unnecessary.
The entire ideological narrative is incoherent nonsense. They completely get it wrong on gender. Then they conflate gender and personality. Then, they conflate gender and gender roles. Then, they conflate what women are with men. smh
There are males and females. That's it! Men in drag are still men. A woman isn't a costume, personality or a social construct, and they act like she is. She's one half of the binary dichotomy of mammals specifically humans.
Only 2 facts are needed to settle the trans topic.
1. Your body and brain develop & grow together -> You simply can't be born in the wrong body.
2. Hating a functional part of you body so much, that you opt to cut it off, is a mental illness.
There are only males and females. Those are dudes in disguise. They aren't trans anything.
The prerequisite to being a woman is being born female, and those dudes were not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasmynnmaleah7553 Why? Because I recognize that they are not that which they present themselves as, and I'm not willing to pretend I don't? That just makes me observant. I'm not addressing how I feel about them misgendering themselves, in the form of gender misappropriation of women.
I figure, woe to the feminists who buy into this ideological narrative-- as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim to be women, and they don't see it coming.
The cis prefix, that was being objected to, wasn't met with respect, so how should they then demand respect? Respect is earned, and is reserved for that which is respectable
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@miraculousk7547 Only 2 genders-- Male and Female. Your imagination, and subjective sense of self doesn't invalidate objective reality. If it did, everyone would be rich, happy and healthy too.
Objective biological realities are not up for debate.
If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that.
Intersex is a disorder, not another sex invalidating the dichotomy of the binary of all mammalian species, and they only EVER present with male and female genitalia.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth, and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively. Male and female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent.
TOO Many people are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender as though they're synonymous, and they are not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jenner only altered his appearance. Still male
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@conor.3875 If sex and gender are truly independent, then why do trans men and trans women go through so many hoops to change their primary sex characteristics??? You’re not trying to change your gender, you’re trying to change sex…. Make it make sense
WAY TOO Many are conflating sex/gender (There are only 2 male/female, and segments of each present with various physical issues, some with psych issues, some with both-- none of which alter the fact that their biology is male or female) with gender roles (These vary from culture to culture, country to country and society to society, BUT-- they all (without exception) refer to the roles of males and females in those cultures, countries, and societies) and personality (There are a ton, and NONE are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as if they're all synonymous, and they aren't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Care to elaborate? The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
They're merely caricatures of what they 'WISH' they were and can never be
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
Thoughts??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No... The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ethandollarhide7943 Look, they can identify as a Klingon for all I care (I don't at all), and then have a surgeon alter their appearance to look like a Klingon, and it wouldn't make them a Klingon, and those who said it did would be delusional too.
Way too many, inappropriately and incorrectly conflate Gender (There are only 2 male/female... That's it) with gender roles (social constructs which refer to the roles of males and females in society), and personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive--hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as though they're synonymous and they are not, leading to their incoherent conclusions and narratives which simply do not withstand scrutiny.
A dude in a wig and a dress is still a dude, even if he really believes his LARP and cosplay is real.
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 It's irrelevant. There is only 1 kind of woman and they're all born female.
The problem with the trans activist ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TorbieGinger Gender-- There are 2, male/female... That's it
Pretending you're something or someone you're not, doesn't make you that thing in reality. It means you're engaged in cosplay and LARPing. Fr@udulent identities aren't valid anywhere
Personality traits and temperament are not gender exclusive, hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys. Get a clue
As it turns out, the prerequisite to being a woman is being born female and those dudes weren't. A woman isn't a costume men can put on and take off, and they aren't a social construct, or a feeling. A woman is an adult, human, female. Now, you know
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 So confirmation bias is what you seek? Wrong guy here. I've made my case why I believe I'm correct and you are not. You, on the other hand, have not made yours.
EVEN IF I agree that gender and sex are not connected (I don't)-- You STILL haven't explained how it is that those biological men are justified in being granted access into women's private spaces-- since you admit that you believe that sex isn't affected by or connected to gender, it doesn't make sense to say that trans women are women.
Do you have any original thoughts on the challenges I brought up about your point of view, definitions and disjointed absence of logic in your narratives? If not-- We'll leave it at agreeing to disagree
Then you better hope those who you're putting your faith in graduated at the top of their class, but still-- the results of their approach are horrendous evidenced by the number of self deletions that occur, even after transition are relatively unchanged from those who haven't yet undergone their treatment protocols, BUT-- be sure to get your 20th booster and go run some laps.
FYI, and fwiw-- Science isn't a consensus.
Oh, and regarding curling up in a hole in the ground-- That isn't very lady-like.
I'm a gentleman, so You 1st
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just some perspective: The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
They're merely caricatures of what they 'WISH' they were, and can never be
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Maksie0 Gender is Binary, Male and Female. It's not an issue. The only issue is people w/ psych disorders -- who don't live in reality about there being two genders.
XX, XY, Birth Defect, That's it! MANY are inappropriately conflating the variability in personality traits and temperament (Neither of which are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females, and tomboys) with 'gender'.
There are clearly males and females with various biological abnormalities, infertility, post menopausal, anomalies and surgeries, etc.-- still male or female, respectively-- and none are representative of a new sex/gender that invalidates the binary.
You can neuter your male dog, make him wear makeup and a dress, and it doesn't make him a female dog. Just sayin...
2. Intersex isn't another gender in the binary. Why, because there is no newly discovered benefit or attribute elevating the human design and are often infertile, but always only represent the 2 sexes in the binary. Also, none are w/ the ability to reproduce offspring by themselves. It's a silly argument to make.
Would you argue that people born with one arm and leg invalidate the norm of people having 2 arms and 2 legs? fyi-- It does not
You can have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon from Star Trek and prescribe hormones etc... and it doesn't make you an actual Klingon, and those who think it does are delusional.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Roxana Blacksea Nah... Not even close. From the dawn of time-- Freedom hasn't been the norm and both men and women have had to struggle just to stay alive, under the oppressive rule of Kings, Pharaohs, Chiefs, Potentates, Emperors, Amirs, Prime Ministers, Presidents, etc...
"Socialism has a history of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it".-- T. Sowell
Facts are awesome and stubborn things. Life isn't fair
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. Not reasonable or rational by any standard.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bathrooms, showers, locker rooms, dressing rooms, changing rooms, prisons are designed and implemented around biology.
What they exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing they were something else doesn't affect that-- All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, costumes, or preferences.
That they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD. It's their inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as they wished they were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jhon Dalton Well, you can neuter your male dog, put him in a dress, put bows in his hair, paint his wittle paw nails etc., and he's still a male dog.
Who said we had to play along? fr-- The whole preferred pronouns insistence thing, granting those men access to women's Sports, Sports teams, Locker rooms, Restrooms, Showers, and Prisons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@OHOHOHOOHOHOOOHOOHOHO The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively.
If one's identity is predicted on the notion that all of society must recognize you as you perceive yourself, contrary to objective reality-- Then that identity isn't valid.
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 You indicted that the law might change if I cry harder, as though it is a matter of law everywhere, and that the failure to affirm someone's subjective identity is illegal-- and It isn't.
We can agree to disagree.
The point is people are claiming to identify as something other than what they are, and then insisting that the rest of society perceive them, as they perceive themselves subjectively. That's insane
One could, for example-- identify as being taller or more attractive, or intelligent, or physically fit than they actually are, objectively speaking.
Gay and Lesbian people don't seem to have difficulty recognizing men and women and discerning the differences to suite their preferences.
Gender refers to the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female, respectively.
Male a female are biological categories, which are fixed and permanent, and one's feelings about them don't alter reality about it being true and correct.
The confusion in terminology seems to be rooted in the fact that they're inappropriately conflating personality traits and temperament, as if/though they're synonymous with gender, and they are not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 And?? Not ANY trans women can give birth.
I don't hate men, and those who you're referring to as transgender women, are men.
Gender and sex aren't disconnected.
Gender is NOT a social construct. You can stomp your feet about it all you want and it changes nothing.
Gender roles are the social constructs and they're well-established, which is why the counter-culture trans-narrative is itself the real construct and you seem unable to process that distinction.
Your inability to process the truth of it, doesn't invalidate the truth.
We're not going to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that we can promote make believe, or cater to feelings. NO! Just... No
They're still men
Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior and personality traits.
Cry about it,and argue about it-- if you must. It matters not
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusbaker1161 I'm not sure why you think, pointing out the inconsistency within your narratives is somehow evidence of me being upset. It looks again, like you're trying to be edgy, provocative, and argue for argument's sake.
If you want to call me trans-phobic-- I really couldn't care less. There's no there-- there.
You can rename men 'trans', and it changes nothing but the name. It doesn't change them or make them women or illustrate that they're trans anything.
If your subjective identity is predicated on the notion that society needs to ignore objective reality, then your identity is not valid.
Nonetheless, my observations regarding your comments are that you have not illustrated any respect for women and their private spaces by advocating in favor of men being allowed to infiltrate their spaces.
Why, according to you-- should men should be able to infiltrate women's private spaces like restrooms, prisons, locker rooms and sports teams?? 🦗🦗🦗
Woe to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian future, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will claim that they're women.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1