Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Transwomen Vs Women - 'I'm Not CIS ANYTHING, I Am A Woman!' | REACTION" video.

  1. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    2
  2. Yup... My issue is discerning reality vs their subjective, delusional self-identity which mocks it-- by suggesting we need to affirm their self-perceived identities. The answer is No... Just No They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    2
  3. My issue is discerning reality vs their subjective, delusional self-identity which mocks it-- by suggesting we need to affirm their self-perceived identities. The answer is No... Just No They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    2
  4. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    2
  5. Yup... Woe, to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian futures, they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men, who will say they're women-- and they don't even see it coming
    2
  6. I don't get it... If someone gets implants in their @ss and identifies as a Centaur-- That doesn't make them one, but that seems to be the rational of those suggesting that altering one's appearance and identifying as the opposite sex, actually makes them that which they identify as... Make it make sense
    2
  7. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    2
  8.  @ignitetheballoon9054  Just adding to the depth of what you're discerning
    2
  9. Gender and sex aren't disconnected. Gender is NOT a social construct. Gender roles are the social constructs and they're well-established, which is why the counter-culture trans-narrative is itself the real construct and you seem unable to process that distinction. The inability to process the truth of it, doesn't invalidate the truth. We're not going to ignore what we actually can observe with our own eyes, so that we can promote make believe, or cater to feelings. NO! Just... No They're still men Renaming a male 'trans', doesn't make him something else, and neither does his quirky fashion sense, or comedic parody of female behavior and personality traits. Make it make sense
    1
  10. So do their advocates who peddle this incoherent nonsense. How is it that Identities which conflict with biology, are Not those of people w/ various psych issues, who are delusional, and dissociative-- by definition?
    1
  11.  @daniellebenfield95  My issue is discerning reality vs their subjective, delusional self-identity which mocks it-- by suggesting we need to affirm their self-perceived identities. The answer is No... Just No They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    1
  12. They'd have less viewership than the WNBA
    1
  13. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    1
  14.  @Gyrannon  I was merely highlighting additional confirmation of the incoherence of the entire ideology
    1
  15.  @Gyrannon  They're inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament, neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender
    1
  16. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    1
  17. Coupled with intellectual bankruptcy
    1
  18. He says, while commenting
    1
  19. Woe, to the feminists who buy into this incoherent ideology, as in their near dystopian futures-- they'll be oppressed by tyrannical men who will say they're women-- and they don't even see it coming
    1
  20. That dude has no self-respect.
    1
  21. Trans women are still men. They're not trans anything. They're still the same sex and gender prior to transition, as they are after transition. All they're doing is drastically altering their appearance, and screwing up their natural body chemistry. Still men Gender addresses the sex assigned at birth and the social aspects of being male or female. It appears that many are inappropriately conflating the variability of personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender
    1
  22. Yup... They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    1
  23. Objective biological realities are not up for debate. If the validity of your identity is predicated on the notion that all of society must ignore objective biological realities, then your identity is not valid. Straight up... It's as simple as that
    1
  24. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after
    1
  25. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after.
    1
  26. They aren't 'trans' anything whatsoever. They're the exact same sex/gender prior to altering their appearance, as they are after My issue is discerning reality vs their subjective, delusional self-identity which mocks it-- by suggesting we need to affirm their self-perceived identities. The answer is No... Just No
    1
  27. Might want to include 'human' in there too. Just sayin...
    1
  28.  @vihtoripuurola3775  Definitions should be precise, wouldn't you agree?
    1
  29. How is it that Identities which conflict with biology, are Not those of people w/ various psych issues, who are delusional, and dissociative-- by definition?
    1