Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "AnthonyPadilla"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Not a justification to expect that everyone in society is obligated to participate in, accept, or validate your cosplay/LARP as rational, reasonable, tolerable or based in objective reality.
Definitely not a great way to persuade those who scrutinize your narratives as counter-culture lunatic fringe and not representative of the values of the societies with whom you seek to integrate, find acceptance, tolerance or validation of your trans narratives -- that your issues are valid.
In what way is your gender identity objective and verifiable, and
Why do you think that is relevant-- regarding spaces designated for, intended for and implemented for females, Not imaginary socially constructed identity claims (which only exist in the imagination), BUT rather are based on biology, which is based on objective reality?
Make it make sense
What are the objective aspects of being a woman?
Got anything???
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Correctional Service of Canada study has revealed that 44% of male-to-female transgender inmates are behind bars for s3xu@l offenses.
The study — entitled Gender Diverse Offenders with a History of Sexual Offending — reveals a troubling pattern of violence among the convicted.
Spanning the years 2017-2020, 99 gender-diverse inmates took part in the wide-ranging study designed to provide the CSC with a profile of this segment of the prison population.
“We’ve known this all along,” former federal inmate and advocate Heather Mason told The Toronto Sun. “But I’m really surprised they did this study. It’s pretty damning.”
Among the findings:
— The vast majority, 85%, were convicted of violent crimes that caused death “or serious harm” to their victims (58% of whom were children or women).
“It’s quite shocking. The study also shows that 41% of trans-women are in for homicide-related crimes while with male inmates it’s only 21%,” Mason said, adding that the study also revealed that in just four years, the number of trans inmates almost doubled.
— Of the 99 inmate sample group, 44% of the trans women convicts are sex offenders.
— 82% of gender-diverse offenders were trans-women with an average age of 42 years old and almost half were serving “indeterminate” sentences.
— Two-thirds (66%) had low reintegration potential. About 64% of these offenders had committed a “current sexual offence,” while 88% had previously been convicted for sexual offences. About 94% committed their crimes while living as their biological sex.
The study also found that 70% of the trans offenders with sex crime jackets were themselves the victims of childhood abuse.
The study added: “Over 80% of gender-diverse offenders with sexual offence histories were trans-women. Sexual offending indicators showed that the majority of these offences were committed while living as their biological sex, and that the highest proportion of victims were children or female.”
In addition, the majority of the “sub-group caused death or serious harm to their victim(s).”
Hope that explains it clearly enough
2
-
2
-
@Junebuggly No, it does not. Looks like it's you... conflating gender/sex with gender roles. You can't change your gender/sex. Gender: The status of being either male or female. The entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete.
An extremely minute percentage of humans are either “intersex” (typically referring to those who are anatomical hermaphrodites) or of indeterminate gender (that is, not easily determined by a cursory inspection of the external genitalia), but that does not negate the incontrovertible scientific fact that there are only two genders.
As far as we know, there has never existed a single human being with the ability to BOTH conceive a child in his/her womb and, simultaneously, successfully inseminate a woman (or in more disturbing terms, for a hermaphrodite to inseminate him/herself). And even if such an individual has existed, that person would be a combination of BOTH male and female, and not some imaginary, novel third gender.
Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. ;)
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2-- male/female... That's it) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (without exception refer to the roles of males and females in society) as though they're synonymous and they are not.
Science has already proven that the binary dichotomy of all mammals is male/female.
A man in a dress is still a man
A man with anxiety about his sex/gender-- still a man
A man calling himself a woman-- still a man
A man with an effeminate personality--still a man
Seethe if you must, then just cope harder
They haven't put forth no reasoning that withstands scrutiny, rendering their narratives and opinions as less than useless and therefore invalid.
Their incoherent rants and invalid claims as valid, are a figment of their imagination.
Reality isn't an anti-trans ideology. Trans is an anti-reality ideology, and they're the ones seeking affirmation, validation, and the participation of everyone in their larp and cosplay, based on the belief that their subjective delusions are based in reality. Newsflash: They aren't
2
-
2
-
@kurtcobainsex Don't conflate gender with gender roles as though they're synonymous-- that's an error.
Seems like you view conforming to sexist stereotypes, as legitimate measures of manhood or womanhood.
Bottom line is: spaces, and organizations focused on being designated for females, are done so, because of biology-- Not feelings or perceptions about it
Replacing objective definitions which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, it is not morally superior, and it is demonstrably harmful, not least of which to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues.
It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic"-- when the total opposite is true.
They believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc., instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@YourRandomBAD Your subjective gender identity isn't what makes you a man or a woman. It's your biology. Science has already proven that the binary dichotomy of all mammals is male/female. Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. 😊
Gender: The status of being either male or female. The entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no third gamete.
An extremely minute percentage of humans are either “intersex” (typically referring to those who are anatomical hermaphrodites) or of indeterminate gender (that is, not easily determined by a cursory inspection of the external genitalia), but that does not negate the incontrovertible scientific fact that there are only two genders.
As far as we know, there has never existed a single human being with the ability to BOTH conceive a child in his/her womb and, simultaneously, successfully inseminate a woman (or in more disturbing terms, for a hermaphrodite to inseminate him/herself). And even if such an individual has existed, that person would be a combination of BOTH male and female, and not some imaginary, novel third gender.
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2-- male/female... That's it) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (without exception are social constructs which refer to and define the roles of males and females in society) as though they're synonymous, and they are NOT- leading to lots of confusion.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@foxmaminigun No, it's a question. 'Why should you care'... Ask yourself. You're the ones seeking my participation in your LARP and cosplay, and affirmation and acceptance from others (Like me) with your pronouns etc.
Why should a man, regardless of his anxiety about his gender (which was established at conception and was observed and documented at his birth), or his desire that reality were different, be treated as anything other than a man??
if a dude wants to dress up in a dress after he's decided to modify his appearance-- he's still a dude. I not saying he doesn't have the right to do that, or talking about my feelings about his choices. I'm just being observant of the fact that he did make those choices. Still a dude
The inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as you/they wished they were in your/their subjective imaginations, doesn't change reality. That's a major area that affirmation-based treatment fails because it fails to provide coping mechanisms to effectively contend with the adversity in life, which is inevitable.
What you exist as, is a matter of objective reality, and wishing you were something else doesn't affect that in the slightest. All men are born male, all women are born female and neither are social constructs, feelings, costumes, fetishes or preferences.
That you/they can't accept that, is at the root of the problem w/ GD.
It's the inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as you/they wished things were-- while failing to realize that your imagination doesn't impact the capacity for discernment of the vast majority to decipher reality from the trans imagination.
The problem you have with your ideological narratives is that life is based in objective reality, and most don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination.
A man in a dress is still a man
A man with anxiety about his biology is still a man
A man with an effeminate personality is still a man
A man pretending to be a woman is still a man
I recommend, getting a friend or a comfort pet or something. Your anti-social interpersonal cries for negative attention, are not earning you any acceptance or compassion. They're just you, making a spectacle of yourself, causing the divide your community alleges they wish to bridge.
Cope harder, given the opportunity, you failed to make your case and failed to persuade. Congratulations, you played yourself
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mrweybanana3210 No, it doesn't...
* Sex/gender (There are only 2male/female... That's it)
* Gender roles (refer to the roles of males and females in culture, society without exception)
* Personality traits and temperament (Neither are gender exclusive--hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys)
Quit conflating gender/sex, w/ personality and gender roles as though they're synonymous. They are not
Life is based in objective reality.
The science shows the natural s3xu@l dichotomy of all mammals as being male/female. Humans are mammals, and they are male or female, respectively. That state is fixed and permanent. A man is an adult, human, male and a woman is an adult, human, female. How do you not know this?
If you change the name of an apple to an orange, it doesn't alter the nature of an apple or an orange in any way, and the same is true when renaming a man something else-- like trans. It doesn't change the nature of the man.
Dr. Miriam Grossman, MD delivers a good dose of truth, regarding so-called "gender-affirming care" during a recent U.S. House Committee hearing. She speaks clearly, as a medical professional and debunks the notion that sex is "assigned at birth", clarifying that it's established at conception, and observed and documented at birth, or before.
Dr. Grossman is board certified in child, adolescent, and adult psychiatry. The author of five books, her work has been translated into eleven languages. "Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist's Guide Out of the Madness" is her most recent book that explains the widespread devastation caused by transgenderism.
Her medical practice focuses on gender-distressed young people and their parents. She believes that every child is born in the right body. Dr Grossman has been vocal about the capture of her profession by ideologues, leading to dangerous and experimental treatments on children and betrayal of parents. She has testified in Congress and lectured at the British House of Lords and the United Nations.
Women are all born female, and men are all born male, which makes the use of cis/trans intellectually hollow and useless, since neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, preference or a costume.
WAY TOO Many are conflating sex/gender (There are only 2 male/female, and segments of each present with various physical issues, some with psych issues, some with both-- none of which alter the fact that their biology is male or female) with gender roles (These vary from culture to culture, country to country and society to society, BUT-- they all (without exception) refer to the roles of males and females in those cultures, countries, and societies) and personality (There are a ton, and NONE are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as if they're all synonymous, and they aren't.
Now you know
2
-
2
-
2
-
@WillieManga Transphobe is a cult term, used by radical trans-activists, agent provocateurs, as well as the woefully ignorant to attempt to virtue signal. The problem you have with your virtue signaling, is the total lack of any actual virtue in any of your unhinged whinging.
Yes, more accepted, evidenced by their flags being flown at various agencies like the WH and the UN, and the constant PR campaign by the MSM.
You're upset because you're unaware of me discussing a facet of the topic such as not all transitions being surgical? I have, but my point is-- there are no trans humans. People are human and they are only male or female. That status is a biological one, and it's fixed and permanent. Cope Harder! Reality doesn't care about your feelings
A woman isn't a social construct, feeling, personality, or a costume that a man can put on or take off.
Quit conflating personality traits and temperament (Neither of which is gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) with gender (There are 2 male/female... that's it), and gender roles which are long-established norms by the people who make up those societies, countries, and cultures-- and vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society-- and the ALL relate to the roles of males and females.
Now you know
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ihatey0y A woman isn't a social construct, a feeling, a s3xu@l preference or a costume that a man can put on or take off. As it turns out-- women (ALL of them) are born female. Now you know better
You could identify as a Klingon for all I care-- and I don't, BUT, you could choose to have a surgeon alter your appearance to look like a Klingon, and it wouldn't make you one, and anyone who says it does is delusional.
There are people. People are male or female, respectively-- and they've been established historically going back to the beginning of recorded history. Segments of each present with various physical and psych disorders, some with Both.
Gender: There are 2 male/female. Personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, & none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys).
Gender roles All relate to the roles of people in society with respect to being male or female, and they vary from culture to culture, country to country, and society to society-- and they're long established and steeped in tradition.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2