Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Trans Kids Are On The Chopping Block" video.

@Bloody-Butterfly Can you justify the expectation that males, who you refer to as trans and present as the stereotypical caricature of women in their woman-face cosplay outfits, have to occupy spaces and organizations designed for, designated for and implemented for females (based on biology-- not feelings)??? I'll wait... 🦗🦗🦗
3
1. Law of Identity: Anything is exactly what it is. For example, a cat is a cat. 2. Law of Non-Contradiction: Something can't be both true and false at the same time. For instance, it can't be both raining and not raining in the same place at the same time. 3. Law of Excluded Middle: Something is either true or false, with no middle ground. For example, it is either raining or not raining; there's no third option.
3
Holding one form of gender expression with a preference over another-- isn't the same as recognizing the difference between males and females, boys/men and girls/women, fact and fantasy, or truth over lies. What they don't have is-- a reasonable expectation to occupy spaces and organizations designated, designed and implemented for females-- just because they make a subjective and unverifiable gender identity claim, doesn't change the fact that the areas they're obsessed with occupying, which are designed for, designated for, and implemented for females are done so based on biology-- Not feelings or socially constructed gender identities The entire toxic notion of 'trans women' is a fictional metaphysical, unverifiable, subjective, and incoherent ideological talking point, and a counter-culture cult term, that is not based in objective reality, and forces it's religiosity on women, with no right nor rational justification whatsoever. Can anyone make it make sense?
3
@TransHippie There is no hate involved in recognizing that a man in a dress, is a man in a dress... That's just being observant. All you have are the lies you tell yourself and others
2
@goodpeople25 What rights don't those males and females have that every other male and female already have? How does a male justify as their "right", occupying spaces and organizations designed for, designated for and implemented for girls/women based on biology (NEVER intended for them)-- not some metaphysical gender identity claim??? Anything? 🦗🦗🦗
2
Males fixating on devoting their time to suggesting that they're justified to be in spaces designated for women (the salient point being that it's based on biology, Not their gender identity claims-- which are disconnected from their biology), It is indeed pretty weird, counter-culture, and lunatic fringe and in no way rational, reasonable or acceptable as anything other than the whinging of the intellectually disenfranchised and morally bankrupt. It's why those lunatic fringe sorts of people aren't validated as being justified
2
@shadowisinsane845 Trans kids are like vegan cats... You already know who's making the decisions, and it isn't the cats
2
Fun Fact: One's preferences regarding gender identity, have no bearing on the fact that among humans there is a binary dichotomy of male and female, as there is with all other mammals-- having nothing whatsoever to do with their perceptions about their own gender. A male's feelings about his gender, gender identity and biology don't invalidate his biology, nor grant him an exception to occupy spaces and organizations designated for females (based on their biology) as such-- , as justified or valid expectations. Fun Fact: 100% of trans women are males, who have no business in spaces designated for females. You can't escape that
2
Awesome!
2
@TransHippie Yes, it is
2
@TransHippie Study: "Risk of S*ic*de and Self harm Following Gender-Affirmation Surgery" Conclusion Patients who have undergone gender-affirming surgery are associated with a significantly elevated risk of suicide, highlighting the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support.
2
The lies you tell yourselves and others will never be truth
2
@MoonStone2626 What you are categorically defined as however; Is. No one has justified the expectations of a male to occupy spaces designed for, designated for, and implemented not for males but for females (based on biology-- not the gender identity claims of some dude with issues)
2
The deciding factor re: spaces and organization designed for, designated for and implemented for girls/women is based on biology-- not your feelings of angst about your gender, or notions of self-entitlement to occupy areas never intended for you
2
Seems to me that trans kids are like vegan cats... It's obvious who's making the decisions, and it isn't the cats
1
@dogenjoyer2480 Terrible comparison.
1
@phaneros8180 There's no hate involved in recognizing that a man in a dress isn't a woman-- rather is a man in a dress... That's just being observant. Get Real
1
@evarhart If objective reality is not real, neither are your conclusions. Pride itself is a worldly attachment. Think deeper thoughts
1
@TransHippie Doesn't entitle males to occupy spaces and organizations designed for, designated for, and implemented for females-- and it never will
1
They need a rubber room
1
@goodpeople25 What rights do those males and females not have that every other male and female have? Get Real
1
@shadowisinsane845 Trans kids are like vegan cats, you already know who is making the decisions
1
It's obvious that no one has justified the expectation that males should be entitled to occupy spaces designated not for them -- rather for females
1
@SomeRandomGuy8368 That seems to make my point that the expectation that males (a socially constructed gender identity claim, doesn't change that) should be entitled to occupy spaces designated not for them -- rather for females is unfounded and totally ridiculous. How does it not?
1
@TransHippie You've got to be intellectually stunted to think otherwise
1
@TransHippie Prove it, or it is
1
The Dr.'s who endorse, promote and perform these procedures share the ethics of Dr. Frankenstein trying to justify creating his monster in mass, for profit
1
@dogenjoyer2480 Not as what you wished you were-- is the point
1
@MoonStone2626 Don’t expect me to accept what you're not, when you can’t accept what you are.
1
The K l a n were/are the Democrats
1
@HeathenGranny The Big Switch is a LIE First of all, probably the biggest thing going for the Big Switch, are 2 facts: 1. Whites in the south who used to be Democrats do now, vote predominantly Republican. 2. Blacks who used to vote Republican now vote overwhelmingly Democrat. Operating on the assumption, which is reasonable that people understand where their own interests lie, many blacks currently see their identification and interests in the democrat party. When did Blacks switch from Dems switch from R to D? • The Dem party was the party of the Dixiecrats all the way through the 60’s. • If what the flawed narrative suggested were true-- that the blacks made a switch to their racial friends, it would appear the switch would have to come in the 70’s and the 80’s-- When blacks see the racists are switching, BUT—in reality blacks switched overwhelmingly in the 1930’s. • The Black Vote went from about 15% to about 75% democrat within about 4 years. • The reason blacks switched from R to D’s had everything to do with the New Deal. • Blacks in the North and the South switched to the Dem party because of New Deal Benefits N. Dems protected slavery. The civil war was about the Dem party North and South, which opposed the abolishment of slavery and the Republican party—which was only in the North. The Dems have been the party of racism and slavery for over a hundred years, and they still are.
1
1. Law of Identity: Anything is exactly what it is. For example, a cat is a cat. 2. Law of Non-Contradiction: Something can't be both true and false at the same time. For instance, it can't be both raining and not raining in the same place at the same time. 3. Law of Excluded Middle: Something is either true or false, with no middle ground. For example, it is either raining or not raining; there's no third option.
1