Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "RattlesnakeTV" channel.

  1.  @sb-uf6jt  The fact that obesity is a huge problem in the US, makes the obvious fact that starvation/famine/food scarcity tends to have the opposite affect
    3
  2.  @millstonegoy  And they obviously aren't having a shortage of food processed with corn syrup or whatever else either. Nations saddled with poverty don't have an obesity problem. Starving people are skinny, not fat
    2
  3. If govt stops incentivizing single mother homes, and punishing men financially
    1
  4. Respect is earned, not owed, and it's reserved for that which is actually respectable. Gender/Sex and gender roles aren't synonymous. There is no internal feeling that is exclusive to men or women (or boys/girls), what makes anyone a man or a woman is being either male or female and reaching adulthood. Their sex and stage of physical maturity makes them men or women, not some "feeling" they have. Believing there is some "essence" specific to males or female as far as feelings go, that can manifest "in the wrong body", is akin to a religious belief, having faith in something that is impossible to prove or disprove. The thing is though, that no one on the "trans" side can actually even explain what this "essence" is, they can't even explain it to themselves yet have convinced themselves that the feeling they have means they "are in the wrong body" - without realising that their discomfort simply stems from not realising that they view conforming to sexist stereotypes as legitimate measures of manhood or womanhood. That is why every explanation given of WHY a male "can't be a man, but is instead woman" etc. relies upon listing stereotypical stuff, or, in some cases is completely abstract and refuses to actually provide any explanation of what they mean, simply stating they "know" that what they feel means what they say it does, even though they can't actually provide a definition of it. "It's hard to explain but I know I'm right" is an attitude one constantly comes up against - a religious faith in something they can't define. This idea that the terms "man" and "woman" carry all this baggage, sexist stereotypes, that people need to live up to or feel comfortable with is a complete fabrication coming from the "trans" side. You lot want a term to reflect aspects of your personality as well, you want to create more boxes to put people in, as you won't accept simply just being a man or a woman based on being born male or female (and reaching adulthood, obviously people are boys and girls before becoming men or women), but believe you need this "freedom of expression" to broadcast what sexist stereotypes you feel more comfortable with - thinking the world needs to adopt the sexist view you lot have (you fail to see just how much you have in common with Conservatives). Replacing objective definitions which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, is not morally superior, and is demonstrably harmful, not least to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues. It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic" when the total opposite is true, they believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc. instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them. Demanding to be legally recognised as the opposite sex of what one is, is in no way shape or form more authentic than accepting the physical reality one is born into. To believe we as individuals can have 100% control over our identity in society, what we are seen as by others, in interaction with, and in relation to, society/the world/physical existence is a fool's errand, it is a delusional understanding of reality and existence.
    1
  5. They said gender and sex are separate, so... If, according to them-- genitals don't define gender, and gender and sex are separate, how does removing/adding them, and/or presenting as a caricature using the stereotypical biological primary sex characteristics of the opposite sex, as the goal post -- affirm it? You're not a woman because you identify as one, and/or dress in drag. Biology is what make a woman a woman and a man a man-- Not a subjective gender identity claim removed from reality. Get it right The false narratives and intellectually bankrupt take away/analysis/propaganda are hollow BS. The hyperbolic rhetoric doesn't establish truth or make your counter-culture ideology valid, much less superior. Don't care if you're gay Don't care if you wear a dress Don't care if you alter your appearance Don't care about your pronoun preferences Don't care about your personal feelings, removed from objective reality None of it makes a man a woman, and none of it justifies males in areas designated for females. You have nothing but whining and cope
    1
  6. No one has justified males being granted access into spaces and organizations designated for females. Way too many conflate gender (Biology-- there are 2 male and female... That's it) with gender roles (Social Constructs referring to the roles of males and females in society), and again with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton, and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), as though they're synonymous and interchangeable -- BUT, they're Not.
    1