Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Science, the Transgender Phenomenon, and the Young | Abigail Shrier" video.

  1. Relax!!! Look, All women are born female, all men are born male and neither are social constructs, feelings, fetishes, s3xu@l preferences or costumes. There's no hate involved in recognizing that a man in a dress is a man. That's just being observant. WAY TOO Many are conflating sex/gender (There are only 2 male/female) with gender roles (These vary from culture to culture, country to country and society to society, BUT-- they all (without exception) refer to the roles of males and females in those cultures, countries, and societies) and personality (There are a ton, and NONE are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys) as if they're all synonymous, and they aren't. Nonetheless, No one has presented any coherent explanation re: Why a man who wishes he were, or believes he's a woman should be treated as anything other than a man-- yet. Got anything??? Why should a man, regardless of his anxiety or desire that reality were different, be treated as anything other than a man?? The inability to cope with things as they are in reality, rather than as you/they wished they were in your/their subjective imaginations, doesn't change reality. The main problem the trans activist's narratives have is that life is based in objective reality, and most people don't have difficulty deciphering reality from the trans imagination.
    2
  2. There's only 1 kind of woman and they're all born female, making the use of cis/trans useless and intellectually vacant. The arguments just don't withstand the scrutiny because life is based in reality, and the trans imagination just doesn't override people's capacity for discernment. A woman isn't a social construct, feeling, or a costume. They conflate gender/sex w/ personality, and gender roles as though they're synonymous-- and they just aren't
    1