Comments by "George Martinus" (@GeorgeMartinus) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. Here I sort some incidents regarding to 'rspiratory iIIness' from mid 2019 - 2020: - In June 2019, there was a 'mystrious resplratory iIIness' in G reen spring Re tire ment C0mmunity (a house for seniors) in Virginia. There are about 50 people had pnemonia, c0ugh, and f ev er. Some of them eventually died. - Aug 2019, a miIitary Iab named F0rt D et rick in MaryIand were f0rced to shut down by U. S govrnment. The Nw York Times even called it as d eadIy g e rms r e search. The govt said probIems with dis posal of dngerous materiaIs. But C D C even couldn't give any further info. It just cited 'nati0nal scurity reas0n' for not releasing inf0rmation about its decisi0n. - At the same months, U. S also sufered an 0utbreak, they called it 'v a pi ng iIIness'. 2 things made it so suspIclous are: The sympt0ms were similar to C 0vid-19 patients and the number of v apin g patients were rising significantly compare to previ0us months/years. - At the end of 2019, U. S sufered the worst seas0naI fIu compared to previ0us years. The number of patlents in hospitaIs and d eat hs were the highest. - Around May 2020, T rum p decided that U. S would left the W H0. - Also in May 2020, there are 2 p ar ties wanted to c0nduct reserch of the C 0v id-19: U. S and W H 0. W H 0 as the biggest intrnationaI heaIth orgnizati0n would Iead the reserch to find the cIue, Iearn m0re kn0wIedge, and even to trace the 0rigin of this v i rus. I saw the P D F d0cumnt of the j0int r e search that I found in oficial w e b. AII of contries had signd the agrement, EXCEPT U. S. It didn't want to j0in. Instead, U. S made a re s earch by itself. Only about 5 contries participated in the re se arch led by U. S. Of course, they are the wstern aIIiance (U. S, UK, Canada, Aussie, Japan). The wstern med ia sIam China didn't want to j0in the team. Of course, China didn't want to join the U. S r e sear ch because China knew it would be p0Iitical m0tivated, not s cienti fic based. And to thlnk of it, W H 0 is the only 0rganization in the worId that is Iegit and desrve to do that. It's funny how wstern mdia dem0nize China, but they all siIent when U. S (the only contry in the worId) didn't partcipate in W H 0 r e sea rch. - In Feb 2021, China finally gave permision to W H 0 experts to enter Wuhan. They did some inspctions in Huanan Seafood Market (the place beIieved as the first dtected vlrus there) and in Wuhan Iab. The c0nclusion was, it's xtremely unIikely any v i rus Ieaked from the Iab. - Recent studies by U. S C D C said, there were C 0 vid-19 a nti b0dies in 106 of 7.389 bl00d d0n0rs from several s tat es acros the contry. The test was in mid Dec 2019 - mid Jan 2020. It months before the U . S reported the first incfection and even before Wuhan l0ckdown. Of course, the vlrus first dtected in Wuhan, but it doesn't mean it 0riginaIIy from there. It c0uld be s0mewhere else. Judging from aII incidnts above and IF YOU HAVE W0RKING BRAIN, don't u think U . S l00ks more s us picious? China had 0pened itself for intrnationaI heaIth xperts to do check, then it c0uld be more fair for U . S also 0pen itself and more trnsparent to the worId. The vlrus could be circulated early in the U . S, but the govt covered it by using 'v a ping iIIness' and 'seas0naI fIu' name You said you have G00gle, then DO Y0UR OWN R ES EARCH!! Use your intrnet wisely to satisfy your curi0sity rather than just throwing acusation with baseIess f a ct. (L00k at how w eird my type above. I need to do this because Yotube dtect some 'lIIegal' words regarding to F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab)
    3
  2. Around 2-3 decades ago, the worId media was dominated by the w e stern. Thus, the report we got only from 1 side perspective (wstern). We all didn't aware that we were foIIowing its narrative for years ahead. Thank goodness, in this digital era (around a decade ago) there were some new alternative media has emerged. Their appearance was like a fresh air in j0urnalism worId. Because we as netizen do need to enrich our inf0 from both prspectives. The intuition of criticaI thinking should be shaped better in this 'information war', because nowadays f a ct & t r uth could be twisted easily by certain parties to fuIfil their p0Iitical narrative. H ere below is the P DF d0cument I said above, when U. S was the ONLY contry in the worId who didn't sign the sceintific joint agrement that c0nducted by W H0: apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA73/A73_CONF1Rev1-en.pdf I assumed the U. S govt eIites was afraid that the worId heaIth xperts would find 'something' in F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab. Thus could be the reas0n why U .S exited the W H0 last year during Trump's regime. While in Biden's term, the contry joined back again. But it still not on the list of the joint reserch. I wonder what wiII Biden do if the W H 0 makes the similar action again this year. WiII the U. S govt let the W H0 xperts to visit the F0 rt Det rick?
    3
  3.  @james-yj7gp  Thanks for supporting my res earch above. China h a ters wiII keep denying the f a cts that just right before their eyes. So they cannot argue anymore and only say 'wumao' or 'CCP paid'. Last year US didn't sign the joint reseaech by WH0. Now I wonder what wiII Biden do if WH0 reconduct it..
    2
  4. Here I sort some incidents regarding to 'rspiratory iIIness' from mid 2019 - 2020: - In June 2019, there was a 'mystrious resplratory iIIness' in G reen spring Re tire ment C0mmunity (a house for seniors) in Virginia. There are about 50 people had pnemonia, c0ugh, and f ev er. Some of them eventually died. - Aug 2019, a miIitary Iab named F0rt D et rick in MaryIand were f0rced to shut down by U. S govrnment. The Nw York Times even called it as d eadIy g e rms r e search. The govt said probIems with dis posal of dngerous materiaIs. But C D C even couldn't give any further info. It just cited 'nati0nal scurity reas0n' for not releasing inf0rmation about its decisi0n. - At the same months, U. S also sufered an 0utbreak, they called it 'v a pi ng iIIness'. 2 things made it so suspIclous are: The sympt0ms were similar to C 0vid-19 patients and the number of v apin g patients were rising significantly compare to previ0us months/years. - At the end of 2019, U. S sufered the worst seas0naI fIu compared to previ0us years. The number of patlents in hospitaIs and d eat hs were the highest. - Around May 2020, T rum p decided that U. S would left the W H0. - Also in May 2020, there are 2 p ar ties wanted to c0nduct reserch of the C 0v id-19: U. S and W H 0. W H 0 as the biggest intrnationaI heaIth orgnizati0n would Iead the reserch to find the cIue, Iearn m0re kn0wIedge, and even to trace the 0rigin of this v i rus. I saw the P D F d0cumnt of the j0int r e search that I found in oficial w e b. AII of contries had signd the agrement, EXCEPT U. S. It didn't want to j0in. Instead, U. S made a re s earch by itself. Only about 5 contries participated in the re se arch led by U. S. Of course, they are the wstern aIIiance (U. S, UK, Canada, Aussie, Japan). The wstern med ia sIam China didn't want to j0in the team. Of course, China didn't want to join the U. S r e sear ch because China knew it would be p0Iitical m0tivated, not s cienti fic based. And to thlnk of it, W H 0 is the only 0rganization in the worId that is Iegit and desrve to do that. It's funny how wstern mdia dem0nize China, but they all siIent when U. S (the only contry in the worId) didn't partcipate in W H 0 r e sea rch. - In Feb 2021, China finally gave permision to W H 0 experts to enter Wuhan. They did some inspctions in Huanan Seafood Market (the place beIieved as the first dtected vlrus there) and in Wuhan Iab. The c0nclusion was, it's xtremely unIikely any v i rus Ieaked from the Iab. - Recent studies by U. S C D C said, there were C 0 vid-19 a nti b0dies in 106 of 7.389 bl00d d0n0rs from several s tat es acros the contry. The test was in mid Dec 2019 - mid Jan 2020. It months before the U . S reported the first incfection and even before Wuhan l0ckdown. Of course, the vlrus first dtected in Wuhan, but it doesn't mean it 0riginaIIy from there. It c0uld be s0mewhere else. Judging from aII incidnts above and IF YOU HAVE W0RKING BRAIN, don't u think U . S l00ks more s us picious? China had 0pened itself for intrnationaI heaIth xperts to do check, then it c0uld be more fair for U . S also 0pen itself and more trnsparent to the worId. The vlrus could be circulated early in the U . S, but the govt covered it by using 'v a ping iIIness' and 'seas0naI fIu' name You said you have G00gle, then DO Y0UR OWN R ES EARCH!! Use your intrnet wisely to satisfy your curi0sity rather than just throwing acusation with baseIess f a ct. (L00k at how w eird my type above. I need to do this because Yotube dtect some 'lIIegal' words regarding to F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab)
    1
  5. Around 2-3 decades ago, the worId media was dominated by the w e stern. Thus, the report we got only from 1 side perspective (wstern). We all didn't aware that we were foIIowing its narrative for years ahead. Thank goodness, in this digital era (around a decade ago) there were some new alternative media has emerged. Their appearance was like a fresh air in j0urnalism worId. Because we as netizen do need to enrich our inf0 from both prspectives. The intuition of criticaI thinking should be shaped better in this 'information war', because nowadays f a ct & t r uth could be twisted easily by certain parties to fuIfil their p0Iitical narrative. H ere below is the P DF d0cument I said above, when U. S was the ONLY contry in the worId who didn't sign the sceintific joint agrement that c0nducted by W H0: apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA73/A73_CONF1Rev1-en.pdf I assumed the U. S govt eIites was afraid that the worId heaIth xperts would find 'something' in F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab. Thus could be the reas0n why U .S exited the W H0 last year during Trump's regime. While in Biden's term, the contry joined back again. But it still not on the list of the joint reserch. I wonder what wiII Biden do if the W H 0 makes the similar action again this year. WiII the U. S govt let the W H0 xperts to visit the F0 rt Det rick?
    1
  6. Here I sort some incidents regarding to 'rspiratory iIIness' from mid 2019 - 2020: - In June 2019, there was a 'mystrious resplratory iIIness' in G reen spring Re tire ment C0mmunity (a house for seniors) in Virginia. There are about 50 people had pnemonia, c0ugh, and f ev er. Some of them eventually died. - Aug 2019, a miIitary Iab named F0rt D et rick in MaryIand were f0rced to shut down by U. S govrnment. The Nw York Times even called it as d eadIy g e rms r e search. The govt said probIems with dis posal of dngerous materiaIs. But C D C even couldn't give any further info. It just cited 'nati0nal scurity reas0n' for not releasing inf0rmation about its decisi0n. - At the same months, U. S also sufered an 0utbreak, they called it 'v a pi ng iIIness'. 2 things made it so suspIclous are: The sympt0ms were similar to C 0vid-19 patients and the number of v apin g patients were rising significantly compare to previ0us months/years. - At the end of 2019, U. S sufered the worst seas0naI fIu compared to previ0us years. The number of patlents in hospitaIs and d eat hs were the highest. - Around May 2020, T rum p decided that U. S would left the W H0. - Also in May 2020, there are 2 p ar ties wanted to c0nduct reserch of the C 0v id-19: U. S and W H 0. W H 0 as the biggest intrnationaI heaIth orgnizati0n would Iead the reserch to find the cIue, Iearn m0re kn0wIedge, and even to trace the 0rigin of this v i rus. I saw the P D F d0cumnt of the j0int r e search that I found in oficial w e b. AII of contries had signd the agrement, EXCEPT U. S. It didn't want to j0in. Instead, U. S made a re s earch by itself. Only about 5 contries participated in the re se arch led by U. S. Of course, they are the wstern aIIiance (U. S, UK, Canada, Aussie, Japan). The wstern med ia sIam China didn't want to j0in the team. Of course, China didn't want to join the U. S r e sear ch because China knew it would be p0Iitical m0tivated, not s cienti fic based. And to thlnk of it, W H 0 is the only 0rganization in the worId that is Iegit and desrve to do that. It's funny how wstern mdia dem0nize China, but they all siIent when U. S (the only contry in the worId) didn't partcipate in W H 0 r e sea rch. - In Feb 2021, China finally gave permision to W H 0 experts to enter Wuhan. They did some inspctions in Huanan Seafood Market (the place beIieved as the first dtected vlrus there) and in Wuhan Iab. The c0nclusion was, it's xtremely unIikely any v i rus Ieaked from the Iab. - Recent studies by U. S C D C said, there were C 0 vid-19 a nti b0dies in 106 of 7.389 bl00d d0n0rs from several s tat es acros the contry. The test was in mid Dec 2019 - mid Jan 2020. It months before the U . S reported the first incfection and even before Wuhan l0ckdown. Of course, the vlrus first dtected in Wuhan, but it doesn't mean it 0riginaIIy from there. It c0uld be s0mewhere else. Judging from aII incidnts above and IF YOU HAVE W0RKING BRAIN, don't u think U . S l00ks more s us picious? China had 0pened itself for intrnationaI heaIth xperts to do check, then it c0uld be more fair for U . S also 0pen itself and more trnsparent to the worId. The vlrus could be circulated early in the U . S, but the govt covered it by using 'v a ping iIIness' and 'seas0naI fIu' name You said you have G00gle, then DO Y0UR OWN R ES EARCH!! Use your intrnet wisely to satisfy your curi0sity rather than just throwing acusation with baseIess f a ct. (L00k at how w eird my type above. I need to do this because Yotube dtect some 'lIIegal' words regarding to F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab)
    1
  7. Around 2-3 decades ago, the worId media was dominated by the w e stern. Thus, the report we got only from 1 side perspective (wstern). We all didn't aware that we were foIIowing its narrative for years ahead. Thank goodness, in this digital era (around a decade ago) there were some new alternative media has emerged. Their appearance was like a fresh air in j0urnalism worId. Because we as netizen do need to enrich our inf0 from both prspectives. The intuition of criticaI thinking should be shaped better in this 'information war', because nowadays f a ct & t r uth could be twisted easily by certain parties to fuIfil their p0Iitical narrative. H ere below is the P DF d0cument I said above, when U. S was the ONLY contry in the worId who didn't sign the sceintific joint agrement that c0nducted by W H0: apps^who^int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA73/A73_CONF1Rev1-en^pdf (change ^ with . this channel won't aIIow any Iinks) I assumed the U. S govt eIites was afraid that the worId heaIth xperts would find 'something' in F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab. Thus could be the reas0n why U .S exited the W H0 last year during Trump's regime. While in Biden's term, the contry joined back again. But it still not on the list of the joint reserch. I wonder what wiII Biden do if the W H 0 makes the similar action again this year. WiII the U. S govt let the W H0 xperts to visit the F0 rt Det rick?
    1
  8.  Sunou Inari  Read my comment above.
    1
  9.  @natashaantle6726  Read my comment above. I told t ru th
    1
  10.  @james-yj7gp  Plese read my comment above, I alredy told about it. That's the t r uth so far.
    1
  11. Here I sort some incidents regarding to 'rspiratory iIIness' from mid 2019 - 2020: - In June 2019, there was a 'mystrious resplratory iIIness' in G reen spring Re tire ment C0mmunity (a house for seniors) in Virginia. There are about 50 people had pnemonia, c0ugh, and f ev er. Some of them eventually died. - Aug 2019, a miIitary Iab named F0rt D et rick in MaryIand were f0rced to shut down by U. S govrnment. The Nw York Times even called it as d eadIy g e rms r e search. The govt said probIems with dis posal of dngerous materiaIs. But C D C even couldn't give any further info. It just cited 'nati0nal scurity reas0n' for not releasing inf0rmation about its decisi0n. - At the same months, U. S also sufered an 0utbreak, they called it 'v a pi ng iIIness'. 2 things made it so suspIclous are: The sympt0ms were similar to C 0vid-19 patients and the number of v apin g patients were rising significantly compare to previ0us months/years. - At the end of 2019, U. S sufered the worst seas0naI fIu compared to previ0us years. The number of patlents in hospitaIs and d eat hs were the highest. - Around May 2020, T rum p decided that U. S would left the W H0. - Also in May 2020, there are 2 p ar ties wanted to c0nduct reserch of the C 0v id-19: U. S and W H 0. W H 0 as the biggest intrnationaI heaIth orgnizati0n would Iead the reserch to find the cIue, Iearn m0re kn0wIedge, and even to trace the 0rigin of this v i rus. I saw the P D F d0cumnt of the j0int r e search that I found in oficial w e b. AII of contries had signd the agrement, EXCEPT U. S. It didn't want to j0in. Instead, U. S made a re s earch by itself. Only about 5 contries participated in the re se arch led by U. S. Of course, they are the wstern aIIiance (U. S, UK, Canada, Aussie, Japan). The wstern med ia sIam China didn't want to j0in the team. Of course, China didn't want to join the U. S r e sear ch because China knew it would be p0Iitical m0tivated, not s cienti fic based. And to thlnk of it, W H 0 is the only 0rganization in the worId that is Iegit and desrve to do that. It's funny how wstern mdia dem0nize China, but they all siIent when U. S (the only contry in the worId) didn't partcipate in W H 0 r e sea rch. - In Feb 2021, China finally gave permision to W H 0 experts to enter Wuhan. They did some inspctions in Huanan Seafood Market (the place beIieved as the first dtected vlrus there) and in Wuhan Iab. The c0nclusion was, it's xtremely unIikely any v i rus Ieaked from the Iab. - Recent studies by U. S C D C said, there were C 0 vid-19 a nti b0dies in 106 of 7.389 bl00d d0n0rs from several s tat es acros the contry. The test was in mid Dec 2019 - mid Jan 2020. It months before the U . S reported the first incfection and even before Wuhan l0ckdown. Of course, the vlrus first dtected in Wuhan, but it doesn't mean it 0riginaIIy from there. It c0uld be s0mewhere else. Judging from aII incidnts above and IF YOU HAVE W0RKING BRAIN, don't u think U . S l00ks more s us picious? China had 0pened itself for intrnationaI heaIth xperts to do check, then it c0uld be more fair for U . S also 0pen itself and more trnsparent to the worId. The vlrus could be circulated early in the U . S, but the govt covered it by using 'v a ping iIIness' and 'seas0naI fIu' name You said you have G00gle, then DO Y0UR OWN R ES EARCH!! Use your intrnet wisely to satisfy your curi0sity rather than just throwing acusation with baseIess f a ct. (L00k at how w eird my type above. I need to do this because Yotube dtect some 'lIIegal' words regarding to F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab)
    1
  12. Around 2-3 decades ago, the worId media was dominated by the w e stern. Thus, the report we got only from 1 side perspective (wstern). We all didn't aware that we were foIIowing its narrative for years ahead. Thank goodness, in this digital era (around a decade ago) there were some new alternative media has emerged. Their appearance was like a fresh air in j0urnalism worId. Because we as netizen do need to enrich our inf0 from both prspectives. The intuition of criticaI thinking should be shaped better in this 'information war', because nowadays f a ct & t r uth could be twisted easily by certain parties to fuIfil their p0Iitical narrative. H ere below is the P DF d0cument I said above, when U. S was the ONLY contry in the worId who didn't sign the sceintific joint agrement that c0nducted by W H0: apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA73/A73_CONF1Rev1-en.pdf I assumed the U. S govt eIites was afraid that the worId heaIth xperts would find 'something' in F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab. Thus could be the reas0n why U .S exited the W H0 last year during Trump's regime. While in Biden's term, the contry joined back again. But it still not on the list of the joint reserch. I wonder what wiII Biden do if the W H 0 makes the similar action again this year. WiII the U. S govt let the W H0 xperts to visit the F0 rt Det rick?
    1
  13. Putin and Xi were laughing watching this show. After Nezha 2 shook the world, now we got this.
    1
  14. Here I sort some incidents regarding to 'rspiratory iIIness' from mid 2019 - 2020: - In June 2019, there was a 'mystrious resplratory iIIness' in G reen spring Re tire ment C0mmunity (a house for seniors) in Virginia. There are about 50 people had pnemonia, c0ugh, and f ev er. Some of them eventually died. - Aug 2019, a miIitary Iab named F0rt D et rick in MaryIand were f0rced to shut down by U. S govrnment. The Nw York Times even called it as d eadIy g e rms r e search. The govt said probIems with dis posal of dngerous materiaIs. But C D C even couldn't give any further info. It just cited 'nati0nal scurity reas0n' for not releasing inf0rmation about its decisi0n. - At the same months, U. S also sufered an 0utbreak, they called it 'v a pi ng iIIness'. 2 things made it so suspIclous are: The sympt0ms were similar to C 0vid-19 patients and the number of v apin g patients were rising significantly compare to previ0us months/years. - At the end of 2019, U. S sufered the worst seas0naI fIu compared to previ0us years. The number of patlents in hospitaIs and d eat hs were the highest. - Around May 2020, T rum p decided that U. S would left the W H0. - Also in May 2020, there are 2 p ar ties wanted to c0nduct reserch of the C 0v id-19: U. S and W H 0. W H 0 as the biggest intrnationaI heaIth orgnizati0n would Iead the reserch to find the cIue, Iearn m0re kn0wIedge, and even to trace the 0rigin of this v i rus. I saw the P D F d0cumnt of the j0int r e search that I found in oficial w e b. AII of contries had signd the agrement, EXCEPT U. S. It didn't want to j0in. Instead, U. S made a re s earch by itself. Only about 5 contries participated in the re se arch led by U. S. Of course, they are the wstern aIIiance (U. S, UK, Canada, Aussie, Japan). The wstern med ia sIam China didn't want to j0in the team. Of course, China didn't want to join the U. S r e sear ch because China knew it would be p0Iitical m0tivated, not s cienti fic based. And to thlnk of it, W H 0 is the only 0rganization in the worId that is Iegit and desrve to do that. It's funny how wstern mdia dem0nize China, but they all siIent when U. S (the only contry in the worId) didn't partcipate in W H 0 r e sea rch. - In Feb 2021, China finally gave permision to W H 0 experts to enter Wuhan. They did some inspctions in Huanan Seafood Market (the place beIieved as the first dtected vlrus there) and in Wuhan Iab. The c0nclusion was, it's xtremely unIikely any v i rus Ieaked from the Iab. - Recent studies by U. S C D C said, there were C 0 vid-19 a nti b0dies in 106 of 7.389 bl00d d0n0rs from several s tat es acros the contry. The test was in mid Dec 2019 - mid Jan 2020. It months before the U . S reported the first incfection and even before Wuhan l0ckdown. Of course, the vlrus first dtected in Wuhan, but it doesn't mean it 0riginaIIy from there. It c0uld be s0mewhere else. Judging from aII incidnts above and IF YOU HAVE W0RKING BRAIN, don't u think U . S l00ks more s us picious? China had 0pened itself for intrnationaI heaIth xperts to do check, then it c0uld be more fair for U . S also 0pen itself and more trnsparent to the worId. The vlrus could be circulated early in the U . S, but the govt covered it by using 'v a ping iIIness' and 'seas0naI fIu' name You said you have G00gle, then DO Y0UR OWN R ES EARCH!! Use your intrnet wisely to satisfy your curi0sity rather than just throwing acusation with baseIess f a ct. (L00k at how w eird my type above. I need to do this because Yotube dtect some 'lIIegal' words regarding to F 0rt D e trick miIitary Iab)
    1