Comments by "Gorilla Disco" (@gorilladisco9108) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. Democrats has urged their voters to register as Republicans and vote Nikki. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    111
  2.  @SigMendelsson  You need higher grade of copium.
    17
  3. Swalwell's lack of training is shown. He only has to debate once every two years, if any. Shapiro has been debating hostile opponents almost every week for the past 20 years. The difference in experience is obvious.
    13
  4. Even programmers have difficult time to produce a bug free software. And computers don't usually trying to find loopholes. 😅
    8
  5.  @RandallJacobs-bp8uw  Don't respond to him. He's just a troll.
    7
  6. ​ @charlizet4314  Umm ... Malaysian and Singaporean government did that without colonizing other countries. On the other hand, China has been colonizing other countries. Tibet, Uighur, (Inner) Mongolia, Manchuria, you name it.
    4
  7. As much as I admire Cruz, this is a low from him.
    4
  8. Keep him there, Mike. We don't want witch of cackleforest to reign in his stead.
    2
  9. Hail Hydra! ... wait ... wrong meeting ...
    2
  10. *deer
    2
  11. 7% for a newcomer out of nowhere is a very good result. See you in 2028!
    2
  12. Who? Gay Pete?
    2
  13. Why is it that every one of Biden nominee are racists?
    2
  14.  @LhJeB74  Of course not, because Tiktok open business in USA, under USA law. In China though, Douyin is heavily censored, because it open business in China, under China law.
    2
  15. I wonder why he didn't wait until Super Tuesday? The race is just begun. Run out of funds?
    2
  16.  @zjeee  Then ask him about the company, not about something that he has nothing to do with.
    2
  17. China already did. They banned iPhone and Tesla on most of places in China.
    2
  18. Every time I see her on tv, she reminds me of Dwayne Johnson in drags. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    1
  19. It's the same. But different. But it's still the same.
    1
  20.  @footlessbird1998  And your point is?
    1
  21.  @Crackrocksteady  It's a feature :yougotthis:
    1
  22. He learned a lot since 2016 😅
    1
  23. The US bought themselves a few years when that man fail to become a supreme justice. I'm not even an American, and I can't hold myself from spitting in disgust.
    1
  24. Do you know that Obamacare basically delay adulthood until age 26?
    1
  25. The "czar" position is a travesty to the US constitution. It's executive branch insidious plot to sidestep Congress check and balance against President.
    1
  26. The case is different. Huawei was banned for government officials. And I think Tiktok is already get the same treatment. But what being debated in the Congress is about Tiktok usage for general public.
    1
  27.  @dinodenodano  To ban it will amount to violation of constitution.
    1
  28. Rubio steamrolled her.
    1
  29. But Democrats want to make human extinct. They started with killing fetus, then they are pushing euthanasia, they chop genitals, you name it. All in the pursuit of human extinction. That's what Democrats is all about.
    1
  30. Rapid fire question deserves rapid fire answer.
    1
  31.  @SigMendelsson  Really? He wants Social Security to be privatize, for one. And he agreed with Trump's method that has close the flow of illegal immigrants (which Biden reopened). If you can see his proposals, it's because you have been blinded by your arrogance. You shall try another copium brand. Maybe it will work.
    1
  32.  @OBBOYS  Oh look, an owl.
    1
  33.  @s.n.9485  He tried to score gotcha against Shapiro. But Shapiro respond made Swalwell lost his train of thinking.
    1
  34.  @OBBOYS  Obsessed much?
    1
  35. And yet, the reporter vote Democrats. See the problem here?
    1
  36. Heh, Dave Rubin called him "Gay Pete" for a reason. FYI, Rubin himself is gay.
    1
  37. Why not? Polish Sejm members could do that too. Of course it ended up with their country being carved and swallowed by Germany, Austria, and Russia. But that's not the point here!
    1
  38.  @monica1811  Don't feed the troll.
    1
  39.  @byaw13  He can't do anything about it. China actively and constantly censoring Douyin contents while Tiktok cannot do that in the US because of 1st amendment and section 230 of the communications decency act. Blaming him will do nothing toward the imbalance of good vs terrible contents in Tiktok. As 1st amendment goes, you can only suppress terrible contents with tons of good contents, not to censor it right away.
    1
  40.  @tootallno  He's not real US citizen just as Obama is not real US citizen. LOL.
    1
  41. Because Democrats will lose. Therefore Democrats voters' voice will be suppressed. See? See?!
    1
  42. Does he ever think that the replacement maybe worse than the current one?
    1
  43. The race is now between Haley (D) and Trump (R).
    1
  44.  @terro3842  What can he do about it? China actively and constantly censor Tiktok contents, while Tiktok cannot censor its contents in the US because that will be 1st amendment violation and open them to lawsuit under section 230 of the communications decency act. US contents are terrible because that's the consequences of free speech. As 1st amendment goes, you can only suppress terrible contents with tons of good contents, not to censor it right away.
    1
  45. LOL. Right? Americans go with the theory, "Them Asian, them look the same".
    1
  46. It depends how Trump team reaction to it. If there is no more Biden as his punching bag, some of Trump rhetoric may not bite the correct target.
    1
  47. Gentoman? What? 🙄 He tried to be politically correct to the point of become ridiculous. 🤔
    1
  48. In my opinion, that Tiktok carries terrible videos in the USA is the consequence of freedom of speech. The Congress should not compare them with Tiktok videos in China, where they're constantly censoring the terrible videos. There's nothing can be done except Congress forces Tiktok to censor their videos in the USA as well. But that will be a violation to 1st amendment. Do you really want to do that? And it's stupid for Cruz to ask about what happened in Tiananmen Square to a ... Singaporean. Note to Congressman (and Americans in general), if a Chinese person bears the name "Chew", he's more likely come from Malaysia or Singapore. To berate him of what mainland China did, is a very stupid thing. We may be look the same to you, but we have radically very different opinion than brainwashed mainland Chinese. You can see that Mr. Chew didn't have any reserve to say there's a massacre there on 1989. No Chinese outside mainlanders will have any objection to say it is what it is. I admire Cruz, but it's a very very stupid for him to ask that, as if he will score a point (facepalm).
    1