Comments by "Toby" (@toby9999) on "Astrum" channel.

  1. No man can end poverty. There will always be poverty. Scarcity is part of the natural balance.
    12
  2. ​@J7Handle Nice that you explain your thoughts in a reasoned way, but I feel that's still a long way from proving Einstein wrong.
    5
  3. There's a lot of phenomena that goes unnoticed by the scientific community or worse, deliberately ignored. Until this attitude changes, I don't hold out much hope for major breakthroughs.
    5
  4. I don't see a problem with speculations sounding more like theology than "actual science". Some level of speculation (or thinking outside of the box) has always been part of the scientific process. Why rule out something simply because it sounds a little "theological"? That would be close minded in my opinion.
    4
  5. Outside of scientific research, this makes little sense. Industry in space... why? The moon and mars would be a dreadful places to live. The other planets and moons in our system even worse.
    3
  6. People who don't like your video either don't like science or don't understand it.
    3
  7. None of that is true. And here's a suggestion... fix your keyboard.
    2
  8. He probably just mispoke.
    2
  9. No one is predicting the future. Maybe you could answer this question: why are there so many dumb comments under this fantastic science based presentation?
    1
  10. Rubbish. They're completely natural phenomena.
    1
  11. Probably.
    1
  12. How can you be fully convinced without having any credible evidence to support it? I won't rule it out, but in my opinion, extraterrestrials would be the least likely explanation.
    1
  13. What's with "kudos"? For 50+ years I'd never seen nor heard the term. Now it's all over social media. I've never used it...ever. Where did it come from? Is it an American thing? Apparently it means praise for something achieved.
    1
  14. I don't believe in the random chance explanation. It's a cop out. There're too many reasons to suspect a lot more is going on that we simply cannot comprehend. Like fish in a fish bowl - the measurable universe is merely the bowl. We're blind to the bigger picture (whatever that is) and probably always will be.
    1
  15. hope he got those weapons
    1
  16. Not necessarily. Depends on how you define "one minute passing"
    1
  17. LOL
    1
  18. ​ @abheceshabemuskk3531  Seens as though human obvsevation is required at some point, even if it's not at the slit... there was an experiment conducted some time ago that demonstrated statistically that human observation was required somewhere along the observation chain. So, I haven't abandoned the "human consciousness is required" interpretation just yet, even though it doesn't sit well with consensus science. Since we don't know for sure, best not to be dogmatic.
    1
  19. Math can be fun.
    1
  20. Nothing wrong with the title, other your interpretation of it.
    1
  21.  @ajr993  Your interpretation of the title is obviously different than mine, else there'd be no disagreement.
    1
  22. LOL
    1
  23. I initially thought about some of the movies but then reminded myself thst they're fiction. So, why would you use movies as a reference?
    1
  24.  @noel7777noel  I don't think it's about clocks slowing down. It's about time slowing down relative to some observer. The clock would appear to run slower to that observer.
    1
  25. You're wrong. I would like to clarify why you're wrong but I'm out of time.
    1
  26. I hate El Nino. More fires drought and heatwaves in Australia.
    1
  27. ​ @BillGreenAZ Alarmed? No. Concerned? Definitelly.
    1
  28. Occams razer is not a rule to be slavishly obeyed. Its usefulness is overated. Evidence is what matters.
    1
  29. You're misunderstanding the so called slingshot effect as I've been doing for the past 50 years :)
    1