Comments by "Toby" (@toby9999) on "David Pakman - A Good Faith Debate with a Progressive" video.

  1. I used to listen to his show years ago but quickly tired of his nonsensical viewpoints. He's the same now it seems and I'm not on the right. I'm pretty centrist on balance. I'm more issue based but this guy... I can't figure him out.
    3
  2. That's not what I saw... maybe I watched the wong video? No, I'm on the right one.
    2
  3. Pakman seems as disingenuous now as I remember him five years ago? Russia liked Trump better than Biden and.... what? That's an argument.... for what? And on it goes...
    2
  4. I stopped watching him around 2015. Seems like I did the right thing.
    1
  5. That was immature. They promised a good faith discussion and fulfilled their promise... so you unsubscribe. Wow. Just wow.
    1
  6. Pakman talked a lot but he didn't actually own anything. He's a better debater but that doesn't make him right.
    1
  7. Ridiculous comment. And your point on interventions is not relevant to immigration policy anyway. They're entirely separate issues.
    1
  8. Your arguments are about as silly as Pakman's. You're bogged down in irrelevant detail. The Triggernometry guys are interested in the overarching concepts, not the minutiae. Pakman dances around the issues by saying a lot without saying anything useful and the guys let him get away with it.
    1
  9. That's a weird argument.
    1
  10. And Trump would have built more of it had the Democrats not blocked him.
    1
  11. Because they have a large international audience, that why. You have a problem with that?
    1
  12. I abandoned Pakman as a news source years ago. He was obviously left biased and ideological then and he clearly still is now.
    1
  13. They disagreed on almost every point. Not sure how you missed that? The Triggernometry guys are to my right politically. Pakman is way to the left. They're miles apart. You'd likely have picked up on it easily if you'd been on this channel for a while like I have.
    1
  14.  @progressivedemagogue8480  Pakman promised a good faith discussion then promptly engaged disingenuous mode. He wiped nothing. Just smoke and mirrors.
    1
  15. A transgender woman.
    1