Comments by "Toby" (@toby9999) on "Git Flow Is A Bad Idea" video.

Not sure why anyone would propose rapid fire commits. Why are people doing rapid fire commits anyway? People committing junk instead of finished work makes no sense to me. This constant committing seems to be a Git thing. I'll never commit anything unless I consider it completed work by some sensible metric.
1
I hate it. Been using SVN for 15 years no problem. Now Git has me tied up in knots. Git just wastes my time. Understanding Git is harder than the C++ development I'm actually paid to do. It's a nighmare.
1
Git is just awful. I'm a great believer in KISS keep it simple. Git is all about making it complex. All of this Git branching and merging creates more problems than it solves. I prefer SVN and a single branch approach I refer to as continuous merging. Regular updates keep my local copy up to date. No need for dozens of separate feature branches. Too many of them sit around for days or even weeks and cause horrible merge issues anyway. Additionally, code sitting in a feature branch is not available to the team and can cause delays. This never happened until we switched to a new fangled Git process.
1
Why do you need to push stuff that isn't done? I only push/commit finished work. This is how I've worked for 25 years without issue.
1