Comments by "Toby" (@toby9999) on "Sam Bankman-Fried u0026 Effective Altruism: A Conversation with Will MacAskill (Episode #361)" video.

  1. No, 25 years is way too long for that class of offence. And there was no "vehement" defence. Ever heard of nuance? If you don't like it then why are you here? You lot remind me of those linch mobs in old westerns.
    8
  2. Thank you for uploading this brilliantly nuanced discussion. Excellent stuff. Your and your guest's thoughts are very much inline with my own.
    7
  3. How do you know all of that? Are you psychic? I guess you can see onside his head, right? LOL
    3
  4. And? There was good reason for both decisions at the time, based on what was known at the time.
    3
  5. ​@user-ch4mm7dy3g You're not too bright, are you? Or perhaps you weren't listening clearly? He's not defending him. He's attempting to provide an unbiased commentary, and he did a pretty good job. As for Bret, why would anyone bother with him given his behaviour during the pandemic? Massive apology requied there.
    2
  6. ​​ @jafrasar1 What pass? And how would interviewing victims make any sense within the context of this discussion? It wouldn't. Your just making cheap shots.
    2