Comments by "Toby" (@toby9999) on "Putin's Invasion of Kharkiv a Disaster for Russia" video.

  1. Gross generalisation right there. Pretty meaningless when every Western government has different goals and policies around Ukrainian support.
    2
  2. ​ @jounik They sent them, so what's your point? Countries will help as they see fit and do so within their capabilities. The UK has been a leader.
    2
  3. Totally irrelevent argument. NK works independently of the US. You're making some kind of a moral argument, but this is war. Additionally, every country has its own policies and processes. The US isn't going to say, "Look, NK has provided X, therefore, we must provide Y" because it's the moral thing to do, right? No, all manner of issues are at play. Hope that answers your question. Sorry for the rant, but the childishly simplistic arguments I see flooding social media are starting to grate. Where are the mature nuances discussions?
    1
  4. It's not strictly correct that Western weapons can't be used. Some western weapons can't be used e.g. US weapons (and others). Some can be e.g. UK weapons (and others)
    1
  5. Trump is extremely unpredictable. I wouldn't bet on Trump doing anything about anything.
    1
  6. Everything you just wrote is wrong or at best moot. I'm not a ruzzian troll. I support Ukraine, but honestly, these comment sections are in severe lack of acuracy and nuance.
    1
  7. Russia will want to avoid a nuclear exchange if it's blind to anything incoming. I could be wrong though. I'm no expert.
    1
  8. Up until the Ruzzians attacked further north a few weeks ago, the policy of not attacking ruzzian territory with US weapons was a reasonable compromise against escalation since the war was being fought inside Ukraine. This has of course changed and politicians are now playing catch up.
    1