Comments by "Manifest" (@manifest2203) on "The way it ALL ENDS: the five endgames that all women face" video.

  1. 169
  2. 163
  3. 43
  4. 40
  5. 35
  6.  @grantwithers  so what? Women should enjoy their time with Chads if that is what women want. Men want to play the field and settle down later too. So what if women want to do the same? There is nothing wrong in women enjoying s3x and then settling down later with someone more suitable for a marriage. I am actually interested in demographics. I have spent some time just self learning on this topic. Yes men can opt out of relationships if they don’t want relationships. It is not like women are lining up for marriage and motherhood either. Globally marriage rates and birth rates have gone down because women aren’t interested either. Europe is the first place on Earth where birth rates fell down below population replacement level. Education and healthcare is free there. Some governments even give free money to have children. Still women aren’t having many children there. In countries like China, Japan, Korea the birth rates are even lower. Korea for example has women’s movements like 4B (no to dating, no to s3x, no to marriage, no to child bearing and rearing). Korea has the lowest birth rate in the world. There is nothing new about opting out of marriages. Young men should also be allowed to choose just like young women do so. Young women should also let go of the lies sold about marriage and motherhood and learn to contribute to society and enjoy life for other things. If they find someone good and genuinely want to marry, they should. But otherwise, nope. Getting married young and having children young is the worst thing that can happen to most women. It causes a lot of problems and traps those women.
    31
  7. 27
  8. 21
  9. 19
  10. 17
  11. 15
  12. 14
  13. 14
  14. 13
  15. 13
  16.  @JustASuscriber  no one is saying it doesnt matter at all. But what men do is blow it out of proportion for women whereas for men they downplay aging. Yes, if men or women want children they should settle young. It is not just women who should have children early but it is men too. Old sperm causes birth defects in children. Even sperm banks take sperm only until age 34 and some maximum up to age 39. That coincides with the egg quality of women also. Most of humanity has come from young seed only because for most of history men married young too. If more older men had children there will be more genetic issues in children. No where in the world, older men are preferred for marriage when younger men are available in huge numbers. Male competition for women is also a reality. In most countries average age gap between couples is very less. Only in stupid Manosphere circles they will be delusional. When it comes to aging, women have the advantage. Older women have go for younger, virile men if they want s3x and fun. No woman has to spend a dime for this. If older women want relationships they can go for older men. Older women are also valued because of their domestic skills, feminine presence and companionship. There is no shortage of older men looking for hospice care wives. But it is older women who don’t want relationships- 71% according to a survey. At their age what use is a man going to be for them? Most men are dependents who whine for everything from food, laundry and so much more and can’t do anything for themselves. And as they become older they become even more dependent and the woman has to manage everything- medication, hospital visits and so much more. Why would any older woman take on a man who is on his decline when he wasn’t useful to them until then and will be even less useful from then on? It is much more sensible for older women to stay single. Even high value men like King Charles, Jeff Bezos got married to older women. They have money to hire endless help. But they married older women for companionship and understanding. They don’t prefer 20 year virgins. You don’t understand high value men or any man who matters. Which older, low value man gets married to a high value woman in this way? No one. Because most men are useless for most women at any age. Aging negatively impacts men far more than women. All this stupidity to shame older women is not rooted in reality. Men don’t do better over women when it comes to aging from any angle.
    11
  17. 9
  18. 8
  19.  @niggaflies  those numbers are few and far in between. Even back then, only fewer marriages were good marriages. Women had to star because it was literally a hostage situation for her. It’s so funny to me that a lot of men say that marriage is oppressive to men and men get nothing in marriage while at the same time so many men vehemently want women to marry young and be stuck. No one has to be married if they don’t want to be. Just because things were done a certain way back then, doesn’t mean it has to be done that way right now. If you know anything about the past, things were anything but easy or good. There were periods of good and things were easy now and then. But we only hear from the good voices. History is a story written by survives. But there was a lot of suffering and lot of hardships too. Especially men were running around being used as to*ols by even more powerful and ruthless men. Even now Putin and Zelensky have done what men always do. Can you think of a country invading another in these modern times? Now those two clowns wil sit at the top comfortably. Now Ukraine has gone into billions of dollars of debt. It is the average common people, low level men who are suffering. So many people have l*st their lives, gotten displaced and lost their homes, they have to pay the debt of their governments once things get back to normal. This was a way of life for most of the human population. In 1800s life expectancy for both men and women were under 35. For most of history men had much, much lower life expectancy. Things were that hard back then. The only time world was relatively peaceful was post WW2.
    8
  20. 8
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 3
  25.  @JustASuscriber  LMAO how is it coping? And how do women age earlier than men? FYI, women actually have longer lifespan than men. Even life insurance premiums are lower for women for this reason. You are beyond delusional 🤣 And when it comes to fertility, how many women line up to have s3x with the average man because he is "fertile for longer"? How many men are interested in women, even older women? Whether you realise or not, male competition exists for women. In the history of the world, less than 40% men have reproduced and passed on genes whereas 80-90% women have. Also, FYI women have started having far fewer children globally. Motherhood is no longer a priority for most women. Most women will be having one or two children anyways. Most women are actively avoiding pregnancies. So what use is a man being more fertile for longer going to be? If 100 women and 1 man are in an island, technically 100 babies can be born whereas if it is vice versa only 1 baby will be born. But if women as a collective arent interested in babies, technically no baby will be born. What men want and how fertile men are, doesnt matter at all. It all starts and ends with the decisions of women. The purpose of every living being is to live well as long as possible and to reproduce. That is the principle on which this Universe functions. Women are way more blessed than men in these two things by the grace of God. Men arent superior than women in any regards. This false idea of male superiority exists only in the delusions of men.
    2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29.  @alexmuenster2102  at this point it should be clear that most women don’t care what most men want. Most men bring nothing but more work, s3xual deg*eneracy (other women drama, outside children drama, STDs and some even have secret second families), laziness and addiction problems (all addictions affect men much more than women- p*orn, video games, sports, social media, gambling, alcoholism, substance abuze, golfing and so much more), and not to mention abuze and actual vio*lence. It is always some issue or the other with most men. Every woman is more likely to d*ie at the hands of the man she is with rather than a stranger. The number one cause of death of pregnant women is murder at the hands of the father of her child. It is not even medical complications as one might expect. Some men are even family anni*hilators. Psychopathy and narcissism are mental disorders predominantly found in men. So now, we have established that most men aren’t w*orth much and are a liability. Now let’s talk about the high value men. The competition for these men will be high and only few women will make it. And even for those women who do make it, it is barely worth it because these men are c*ontrolling. Freedom is worth more than anything. That is what women should aim for. Women should save up for a decade and have one or max two children if they want in their early 30s, with or without marriage. Every woman should only have the number of children she can support. This mitigates the risk that fathers pose and their abandoning the child wouldn’t affect the women and children much. But even if the woman can support more kids, having lesser kids increases the quality of life of the mother and also her children. And more women should consider sperm banks, shop for the best genes and elect to have daughters. More women in society is good for society and is especially useful for the mothers.
    2
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36.  @grantwithers  so what if more men lose interest in women? Nothing will happen. If you look at history, most societies worked with fewer men anyway. Most men are already inebriated, underperforming zombies anyway. Most of the addictions affect men much more than women: p*orn, video games, sports, social media, gambling, substance abuze, alcoholism and so much more. The women who deal with these males waste years on them. It is women who have the mentality of the “good woman” tag who get burned the most. If these men aren’t s3xually degen*erate, they are vio^lent or abuzive. It is always something or the other with these men. Whereas most women have full time jobs and also support dependents too (children, even old people are supported by women). Not having a man improves the quality of life for most women. If a man doesn’t want women who have enjoyed her s3xuality, he can stay single. It is hypocritical to be perpetually th*irsty and lust*ing for women all the time and then be jealous of women for living that lifestyle. No one is forcing any man to do anything. Men who actually matter don’t care about that anyway. Recently Logan Paul was dragged for marrying a woman with a high body count. He came back and said that he was lucky to lock her down and that he has seen it all in terms of online bu^llying and tr*olling and doesn’t care. Now if that is not masculine, I don’t know what is. I didn’t say most women don’t have children. Women choose to have fewer children now. If you look at birth rates, in most of the countries it is below replacement level (which should be 2.1). So most women are having only one or two kids. And child free by choice women numbers is increasing year on year. And women who have kids don’t necessarily want a man. I mentioned Korea because it is in the East. They may follow the West in some aspects but their cultures are very unique in their own way. China for example, has 35 million more men than women because they k*I’ll off their girl children. It is estimated that about 30% to half the men in China can never get married and have children even if they want to. When it comes to gender dynamics and birth rates, it is not like only West has changed. Women’s movements exist everywhere in the world, not just in the West and the idea of walking away from marriage is not exclusive to men. I encourage more men to try it instead of whining. Women have already been doing it, without this much whining. So what if women are single and have wine and have cats? Not being the bang maid of any man and be his mommy to do caregiving for him increases longevity of women. Caregiving role is what sucks the life force out of women. It ages women faster and makes them look older on top of reducing their lifespan whereas being with a woman increases the lifespan of unworthy men. Women should only take care of their kids. Women shouldn’t have to take care of other adults. But marriage makes women take care of the man as if he is her child too. Most marriages are endless work most of which is caused by the man, having to deal with the constant whining from the man, having to deal with his deg*neracy, vio*lence and abuze. It prevents woemn from raising good children. That is why most women who enter marriages leave them. About 50% marriages end in divorce and women file 70-80% of the time. If not for their children, even more women will file for divorce.
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39.  @callak_9974  I don’t understand why you men simply live in denial all the time. No matter how much real world teaches you things, you consistently fail to learn. Yes the world is superficial right now, because men and women don’t want to invest too much time in relationships. Relationships are a lot of work and no one wants to put that much effort. For women especially, women would rather chase their own financial security because money will come directly to their hands rather than having to depend on a husband. How is it ok to say 100% women are looking for the top 10% men? Last I checked, marriage and relationship happens to men across all socio economic levels. Yes, women “prefer” men who are at the top levels but women absolutely compromise and marry men in all level because it is not realistic to pursue only the top percentage of men. If women were only chasing the top percentage of men, more women will be ultra feminine and be everything that those types of men want. But women also aggressively pursue all types of careers, achieve so much and build a life for themselves. They get with men on similar levels and offer a lot of value to those men. A man whose spouse earns a good amount of money through her hard work will live an even more elevated lifestyle than a man whose wife doesn’t contribute financially at all. And men, especially men who have achieved things definitely look at the class, profession of the woman they get with. Only low value men who don’t have anything don’t think about it. What the woman does, her social class dictates the kind of lifestyle that they will live as a couple. The idea of a waitress marrying a millionaire is very, very rare. Most people marry within their class. If a woman worked in McDonalds, chances are high that she will marry a guy who works there too. If a woman levels up, she will meet many men in that level and she will have access to those men which she would not have had, had she not leveled up. Yes, female beauty absolutely has value, just like male beauty. Physical attraction matters to both genders. Most women don’t marry men they aren’t attracted to either. Beauty standards exist for men too. But most men who are worth anything don’t choose women based on looks alone. They do make good husbands and fathers, but they won’t just level up any woman just like that based on looks. Men who say they don’t care about anything more than looks are the same men who will later regret it because they do not understand how relationships work at all. This is just a delusional Manosphere talking point but it has no basis in reality.
    1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43.  @alexmuenster2102  do you really think older men are all getting younger women? 🤣 The clownery of it is too funny. Most women don’t find older men attractive. Most women don’t choose older men over younger women. Age gap relationships are the exception and not the norm. Among younger women many remain single too and even celibacy among young women is on the rises It is reported that about 26.5% younger women haven’t had s3x in a year. Even if an older man attracts a younger woman against all odds because he has immense wealth (teh money is attractive and not him), chances are very high she will leave. Age gap relationships have the highest percentage of divorces. This “growing pool” of younger women find older men cre*epy. Most women prefer men only two or three years older or younger than them. And if you look at age gaps between couples across the world, it checks out. No where in the world are cre*epy older men celebrated or given access to “growing pool” of younger women. Most men marry young too. Btw, 71% older women do not want a relationship. What use is a man going to be? Most women still do have one or two children. After that they are pretty much done with the male population. They focus on their kid, their career or job and focus on their social network and themselves. Most women lose interest in men. This math that you are coming up with is delusional. No matter how much women say women are happier single, you men won’t believe it. You make it seem like women run out of men. Women don’t. You men don’t understand that being single is far above being in a bad relationship and most women know that because they experience it. It is always much more difficult for a man to catch and keep a woman rather than the other way around.
    1
  44. 1
  45.  @S62r  actually countries which have high success rate of arranged marriages, have loads of other problems. For example China and India have high success for arranged marriages. But together these 2 countries have 35 million more m3n than wom3n because they k1ll off their girl children. These countries are so patriarchal and are very abusiv3 towards wom3n on all levels. It’s still like wom3n cannot leav3 bad marriages. All these countries have high rates of DV and crim3s against wom3n. Those are some of the reasons for high success of arranged marriages. Another place where arranged marriages are successful is 1slam1c countries. The main reason it works is because of strict r3ligious constraints which s3verely punish wom3n with bru1tal punishments. Yes, to some extent wom3n have power if they are from well to do families. But for most, it is not so and even in rich families survival is tough. And note that in China and India, it is the parents themselves who are cru3l to their girl children by k1lling them, not giving them inheritance. IMO not enough is spoken about parental 3xplotation, denial of opportunities by parents (not “allowing” daughters to study, not allowing them to move to a different location of studies or jobs, and so much more), treating h3r like a free maid by the parents and siblings and so much more. M3n across societies aren’t taught to be good husbands, sons and fathers, but wom3n are expected to should all the responsibilities and often made to excuse the deg3nerate behaviour of others (parents, siblings, in laws, husbands). And then wom3n are made to put up with a lot of BS for the sake of their children.
    1
  46. 1
  47. 1