Comments by "Spring Bloom" (@springbloom5940) on "The Mail Bomber is Almost Certainly a Liberal who Listens to Legacy Media Fearmongers" video.

  1. Leonard Washinton Its way, you hillbilly.
    5
  2. Chancellor Merkelisms It might be Alex Jones.
    3
  3. PWNtang _ Right, because if theres one thing you can count on a bomber to do, its be rational 😒
    1
  4. PWNtang _ Bravo, way to completely miss the point.
    1
  5. PWNtang _ Well you just missed a blatantly obvious one. Ill give you some time...
    1
  6. PWNtang _ Take all the time you need. Read carefully and think deeply...
    1
  7. PWNtang _ Dont forget to tuck and roll
    1
  8. SeranaIsBae None of them reached their target, why would they have gone off? Unless your argument is that if it were a RWNJ(that is the implication) that they wouldve been defective and gone off prematurely? But, just for you, I would imagine that one or more of the devices have been placed under observation and allowed to do its thing, to determine their efficacy.
    1
  9. seansimmons73 There are two available images and both are of viable designs. The important image -----> https://e3.365dm.com/18/10/750x563/skynews-obama-bomb_4463801.jpg?bypass-service-worker&20181024224614 Thats a fucking pipe bomb. Whether it will actually work or not, you better know its meant to work. You people had better get your heads around whats going on; a more likely than not Trump fanatic, has sent 10 mailbombs, to 7 people and we dont yet know if thats all. We dont even know who it is yet, or their motive and you all are already making up fantasies to avoid and deny. Stop making excuses and cowboy the fuck up. Myself, I dont care what their motive is or what letter they put by their name, I hope they find the asshole splattered on their basement walls. Next best thing would be a glorious confrontation with SWAT.
    1
  10. dave h Ummmm... no, Im competent. I guess as a Trump cultist, you would make a defective bomb that goes off prematurely? I mean, thats the only remotely logical argument I can glean from your comment.
    1
  11. 'There would be no reason to sabotage your own side' You are making the unfounded, unqualified assumption, that the person who mails half a dozen people bombs, is... um... rational
    1
  12. Ron Breton Or you know, maybe all the packages were in delivery, by the time the first was discovered?
    1
  13. Ron Breton How many reached their target?
    1
  14. Ron Breton Do you not find it a little ironic that virtually everything you think you know about this... is from CNN?
    1
  15. Ron Breton They haven't even identified a perpetrator and you're already rationalizing and denying. ...psssst, you can tell me, I wont tell... you're scared its a wackjob Trump fanatic, aren't you?
    1
  16. Ron Breton Wow, you are delusional
    1
  17. Ron Breton Yes, 'whackjob Trump supporter' Seems these been a major break in the case...
    1
  18. Josh M No, it doesnt, it suggests a competently constructed device, that doesnt go off when or where its not supposed.
    1
  19. Gulf Relay Dont be NPC
    1
  20. Dennis Smith Lets say thats true. Then that is definitive terrorism, to exclusion of any other objective. So, it would seem that Trump has inspired a terrorist. Now, how do you feel about your stupid, rationalized argument?
    1
  21. James JamesBond The mistake is thinking people who mail bombs, are stable and rational. Something you should probably think about, before spouting hate rhetoric.
    1
  22. James JamesBond His bombs were solid, they were functional and didn't hurt anyone they weren't supposed to. You're just not very smart.
    1
  23. James JamesBond WTF, how exactly does that make it a 'prank'???
    1