Comments by "Spring Bloom" (@springbloom5940) on "" video.

  1. +Nigel Martin That touches on the root problem with Socialism. It's a beautiful, poetic idea and /should/ be the way the world works. But, its not. Individuals have unique needs and desires; an equal share is not synonymous with a fair share. So, how do you determine what is a fair share? The solution has always been social engineering, to 'normalize' the population's desires and needs, which is why it ALWAYS leads to tyranny and purges; because for it to work, requires a homogeneous population of identical people. As it stands, there are more than enough resources available for everyone on Earth to live in luxury, but harvest and distribution of those resources, is a monumental challenge that Humans may never meet. If we do solve those logistical problems, then Socialism would be obsolete, anyway, because there wont be any need for 'shares'.
    2
  2. Yeah, they should. If, for example, youre a lazy, entitled taker who doesn't produce, only puts out their hand for some more of mine, then yes, you deserve to be too poor to live.
    1
  3. +Michael HUA!
    1
  4. +The vaping Polisher This is why KGB called these media figures 'useful idiots' and why they were the first to go, when they achieved their Socialist/Communist utopia. Cant have these troublemakers hanging around once they find out their virtue and moral superiority are no longer 'special'. Cant have them 'speak truth to power', when they stop getting paid for their altruism and boundless compassion.
    1
  5. +Danny Knapp No. People are poor, because they take low paying jobs that accommodate their lifestyle. I can guarantee, that you can go out, right now, TODAY, and get a job that will pay you a 'living wage'. But, it might take you more than 5 minutes to wash it off when you get home and you probably wont have time to go out and party every day.
    1
  6. +Tommy Labb And the Boss still gets rich.
    1