Comments by "Spring Bloom" (@springbloom5940) on "Are mRNA vaccines safe? | Vincent Racaniello and Lex Fridman" video.

  1.  @benjaminfuchs8500  'Every vaccine ever' uses live or dead virus, in a gelatin and immune booster sabot. The mRNA vax is not 'every vaccine ever' and that's exactly the point. It is a completely different approach, more similar to a two-stage injection; using mRNA as a syringe to inject an engineered and synthesized protein to deceive your immune system. It's like taping a photo of someone else on your windshield, to trick the cops. It works. It doesn't work well, which is why 'breakthrough' cases, may be 3 - 5 times higher than reported. COVID exploits slow reacting immune systems, so even a small jump on it, produces remarkable results. Efficacy numbers are based upon a presumption that the recipients would have become critically ill without the vaccine. This is extremely problematic reasoning, given the stark transition between COVID's general low severity and substantial lethality; chances are in the high 80% that you wont even get sick, but a ~1% chance you'll die. But, I digress... the issue is that, not killing you like arsenic, is not the same thing as safe. The valid concern here, is the cumulative effects of repeated introduction of synthetic pathogens, to override and reprogram the immune system. Vaccine testing , not development, but testing, usually takes 7 -10 years, prior to approval, specifically because 'every vaccine ever' does not 'present side effects in 2 - 6 weeks'. That's just the vaccines that have come to market through the 7 - 10 year approval process. Get it 🤨
    52
  2. And what if repeated re-injection with a modified/synthetic protein, damages your immune system? You know, something that doesn't show up for several years? When all the kids they're injecting turn 30 and come down with compromised immunity?
    18
  3.  @jasonkilley  You mean the trials that are still in progress.
    4
  4.  @edpr2244  CITATIONS NEEDED
    3
  5.  @cortical1  Appeal to authority - argument invalid
    2
  6.  @Austin-t3k  Wow, every 'scientist', just by virtue of being a 'scientist', has 'spent their life researching this'? Got a litte shoe polish there on your the corner of your mouth.
    2
  7.  @_nebulousthoughts  FALSE
    2
  8.  @pablomg91  Funny you should ask. MA Clinical Psychology (UH1999). Don't use words you don't understand; you just never know who you're talking to 👍
    2
  9.  @pablomg91  See, this is the point were most people have the sense to stop.
    2
  10. 5:35 Uh, yeah, because it hasn't been in circulation that long
    1
  11.  @jeddmohlenkamp6870  Its the Law of the Hacker: nothing is so bad you can't make it worse, trying to fix it.
    1
  12.  @jph2455  The opinion on that is that its bullshit and never happened. Please find me the case examples of that happening.
    1
  13.  @jasonkilley  You are either hopelessly subservient, or a paid poster. Im trying to decide, so I can address you rhe right way. Would you say you're more of an idiot, or a liar?
    1
  14.  @cortical1  Now, I think your reading comprehension is so poor you don't even understand what you write... or... you're simply dishonest.
    1
  15.  @cortical1  No, now this is strawman.
    1
  16.  @cortical1  Ok, you're just dishonest. Thank you for clearing that up.
    1
  17.  Sedition Happens  Your reading comprehension is as bad as his.
    1
  18.  @cortical1  Sorry, can't understand you with all that straw in your mouth.
    1
  19.  Sedition Happens  You are using words you don't understand.
    1
  20.  @peterjf7723  And yet, not a single, solitary fact to challenge me. Thanks for sharing your cowardice, so everyone can see how cringy you are 👍
    1
  21.  @galactic_ape1929  Nah, Ill stick with demanding the person who made the assertion, prove it.
    1