Comments by "Spring Bloom" (@springbloom5940) on "CNN"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
'Paused', or not; 'international effort', or not; it is a clear and outstanding conflict of interest, for Biden to directly leverage US aid, for the removal of an official, potentially investigating his son. Now, imagine Mexico calls and demands the removal of a Federal Judge, potentially investigating Trump Jr, let alone leveraging official policy against it. How would that play out in the media? We know what Biden did, because he boasted about it, we don't know what Trump did, or even what the secret accusation is. That's the difference here and why the two are of at least equal concern. Yet, here is CNN, predictably(sigh), outright dismissing the Biden issue... and on the foundation that the MSM hasn't reported any wrongdoing, no less 🤦
And then you're shocked that people want to harm you.
6
-
6
-
Nope, YOU are lying. Im a former intelligence analyst, who has worked directly with CIA, developing 'reports' and they almost never draw conclusions, unless they have irrefutable proof in the form of primary records, such as photos, videos, recorded confession, etc. There is zero chance that they would make a definitive conclusion about this. What they would do, is outline the evidence and sources and give a confidence rating. That confidence rating is highly speculative and always relative. I mean Christ on a stick, when did you people start taking CIFUCKENA's word for ANYTHING. They literally lie about what day it is, as a standard operating procedure. 🤦
Edited fir tipoes
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Ahhhh, the mental gymnastics.
You demanded, not only that he do this, but that he do it this way. But still, somehow, its completely wrong and monstrous.
Hes playing you against yourself; proving, openly and clearly, beyond shadow of doubt, that you dont give a fraction of a shit about the families, only undermining President Trump. Congratulations, useful idiot.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@ericpalmer3588
Ive been a technical advisor on over two dozen films of various types(training/instructional products, very low budget independent films and a few larger studio films) and protocols varied, as did their enforcement. But, in every single case, if anyone but someone from the weapons crew, tried to give a gun to someone, or take a gun from someone, they would stop everything, until the head armorer accounted for every gun and round of ammunition. On one occasion, a single blank was misplaced and it shutdown the entire set for 20 min while they found it; got knocked off a table and kicked around. Then they locked it in a box and replaced it.
Taking a gun from anyone but the ordnance personnel, is exactly the same as taking a gun from a vagrant that wandered onto the set... or just finding a gun on the ground.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5