Comments by "WloCkuz" (@wlockuz4467) on "Cool Worlds" channel.

  1. I am glad that even for the smallest snippets you use in the video, you give proper credits, whether it is a movie or another creator. Not only it is fair, but it lets me, and probably many others, find channels that cover these same fascinating topics.
    4
  2. Interesting take, also if you look at the diagram the world line of STL ship starts below the point where Earth observes the supernova, This doesn't make sense because it implies that Earth somehow how sent off the STL ship before it observed the supernova? Technically it should start at or above any point on the time axis where Earth sees the supernova, as in implying Earth sent off the STL ship as soon as it observed the supernova. And if you actually put the origin of the STL worldline where it should be (when Earth observes the supernova) the causality violation disappears. I don't know if this is an error in the diagram or just me misinterpreting it, I would love it if someone else could confirm it.
    3
  3.  @unreachablesecretary  Trust me we'll figure something out, Not saying that we are the masters of the universe by any means but we have figured out seemingly impossible things and FTL communication is just that.
    3
  4.  @Gnulcho  Reminds me of my favourite quote: "God is the most uninteresting answer to the most interesting questions"
    3
  5.  @CoolWorldsLab  Hate to be that guy, but 404 is a code for a network request that means the thing you're trying access doesn't exist. Because we know that black holes do in fact exist, I think a more accurate analogy for blackholes would be a corrupted sector on a hard disk. 🤓
    3
  6. I have always found comfort in this interpretation. "We are the universe trying to understand itself"
    2
  7. My friend, you can't really answer this question because it will always lead to a recursive paradox. Consider this, If you find an answer to everything then what is stopping you from asking why is this answer the answer and not something else?
    2
  8. I don't think its arrogance, its merely a limit of our current understanding.
    2
  9. Honestly, I like the alien spaceship theory just because its more entertaining and interesting lol
    2
  10. ​ @Farrukh_Bari  Do you see the fallacy in your statement? You're saying "God has always existed" and that's exactly the question we are trying to answer - "Why is there something rather than nothing" So against your statement one could ask why has god always been there. See how involving a god doesn't help the question nor the answer.
    2
  11.  @Farrukh_Bari  Did you watch Carl Sagan's argument on this in the video? If god has always existed then why can't we just assume the same thing about the universe? The fallacy lies in the fact that you can assume either ideas to be true but it doesn't change the reality. Absolute godhood is hard to comprehend for the human mind but lets assume you're an all knowing god in this universe then wouldn't you at some point, ponder the same question of "where did I come from?" If you conclude that you must've always existed then the next natural question is "How?" If you conclude that something must've caused you to always exist (by your own logic) then we are back to zero because "Why was there something rather than nothing?"
    2
  12. 13:50 Correct me if I am wrong, Why is the world line of STL ship below the world line of the supernova observation, but the world line of FTL ship is at the intersection of the supernova observation's world line with Earth's world line? Doesn't the STL world line being below supernova world line imply that Earth somehow sent the STL ship before it even observed the supernova? If you take the STL world line and make its origin same as the FTL world line, as in implying that Earth sent off the STL ship as soon as it saw the super nova, and then trace the event with STLs time slice, the cause doesn't transpire effect. There is also the message from STL back to Earth which for some reason inherently travels back on the time axis?
    1
  13. Am I missing something or he is getting absolutely ripped with each video release.
    1
  14.  @HawkqOjOp  Thank you, I lost my mind last night trying to figure out how that was right lol
    1
  15. Maybe I am naive, but is it just me who believes that we will just figure it out one day, We are not the masters of the universe by any means, but we are humans and we have figured things out that were seemingly impossible, some of the discoveries of human ingenuity are so out there that it may as well be labelled a miracle, and just like that one day we'll discover proper means of FTL communication or travel.
    1
  16. Thats where it gets weird, to know if it has collapsed or not you have to observe it, and the act of observing it, collapses it. So there is no way to tell if it was our observation that collapsed it or someone else's leaving out any chance of communication.
    1
  17. 13:50 Correct me if I am wrong, Why is the world line of STL ship below the world line of the supernova observation, but the world line of FTL ship is at the intersection of the supernova observation's world line with Earth's world line? Doesn't the STL world line being below supernova world line imply that Earth somehow sent the STL ship before it even observed the supernova? If you take the STL world line and make its origin same as the FTL world line, as in implying that Earth sent off the STL ship as soon as it saw the super nova, and then trace the event with STLs time slice, the cause doesn't transpire effect.
    1
  18. We don't know, but numbers and by extension Mathematics, is the only language we have known so far that permeates the universe.
    1
  19.  @Farrukh_Bari  Theres no point in arguing if you want to present beliefs as facts. If you're happy with a brute fact then good for you.
    1