Comments by "Misty Culous" (@mistyculous9644) on "Thoughty2" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. After reading "Language, Thought & Reality" by Whorf... It was the first book where I could understand the words, but it took me much study to wrap my head around its content. Hopi verbs have TWO forms of their tense, named: "Objective" and "Subjective." The 1st "Objective" verb category means: What people together can witness moment by moment. (So if you can see something behind your friend, you had to use the Subjective tense.) What you personally perceive doesn't exist for everyone just because you perceive it - as "Reality" does in English. 2nd: The "subjective" verb form: Whoever listens will have to believe your report - despite what you say not existing for them. With this "scientific objectivity," Hopi might seem like a serious language of physicists and mindfulness...But in everyday life, I heard that Hopi people often laughably tease each other by saying entertaining, wild stuff they supposedly verify is true for them. If you wonder...how do "tenses" happen in Hopi? Huge categories of verb modifiers - modifiers that Whorf said gave a unique sense of relative time - not "factual time." Example: (as I understood the book) if you wanted to say: "Usually, I intend to run every morning for my strength, please join me," A Hopi literal word-for-word example translation with Hopi sentence structure would be: (subjective form:) I'm intending, I'm running, (then verb modified words:) daily, rhythmically, strongly, dawning and (still subjective form) we are running (verb modifier:) together. For awhile I tried to use English words and re-order them the way I understood Hopi does - it really stretched my brain!
    2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. The best book on this gender differences in speaking style that I've read was: "Talking 9-5" By Deborah Tannen, Ph.d Linguistics. So - there are exceptions to every categorical generalization, of course. As a female, I physically I did not "fit into" any group because of being much taller. The "female" style of speech wasn't my only choice. What shaped that in my upbringing is that most girls are programmed to be trained to pay attention to future children who need their attention by being routinely interrupted by their parents. I was allowed to focus and not interrupted as a child - like a boy. Plus, I had lots of time with a retired father. As I matured, I got that men had another speaking style culturally. So if I wanted to get along with a man in an intimate relationship and be able to communicate with him, I had better learn this male speech culture. It's tricky to know and get practice articulating what you think, when your female role is to listen to a man. A guy who constantly controls the auditory space with their own determination of topic, pace and a "ranting" sort of speaking style - challenging. How do you ever get a chance to speak when your conversationalist's speaking style forces you to make an awkward interruption to say anything? You'd tend not to talk at all. What helped me most was joining a David Bohm style dialog group (30 people or so) - During the dialog I took notes to help me remember what I wanted to contribute on the fly. This helped me learn continuity of memory - so I could be a better listener and I wasn't just repeating to myself what I wanted to say so I didn't forget it.
    2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. ​ @MrYoungzay  ...then your invention will be bought - and shelved by the competitor of your invention who has much to lose if the invention is successfully manufactured and distributed as it was designed. Your patent is only as secure as the money you can invest to defend it, unfortunately. But I don't think these sorts of injustices are limited to the USA. The French had long-term ongoing activist demonstrations every weekend in 2018-19 protesting large corporations being paid by public taxation for transitioning to "cleaner" manufacturing. This is why the "Carbon Tax" is going to happen in the USA - a similar solution. It's also why the reasons for these ongoing French demonstrations were kept out of the US news. Carbon Taxation is a corporate scam splendidly justified by pseudo-environmentalists who say it's a "Climate Change" solution - people aren't going to realize what Carbon Tax really represents because of this "doublespeak." Essentially, the Carbon Tax will be paid by the public in the form of "subsidies" to the Corporations who stand to lose out as alternative energy is developed and implemented. The Corporations who benefit, will then pass on their (subsidized) increased costs to their buyers as a business expense - so the Corporations will get double benefits. Those corporations believe they need to get paid to make the transition to "green" energy solutions. Otherwise, these big companies aren't going to allow the progress of environmentally cleaner power and manufacturing to happen. Just as they have been buying and shelving any invention threatening their business...for decades.
    1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1