Comments by "Misty Culous" (@mistyculous9644) on "I ask ChatGPT its Plans for World Domination. LOL" video.

@madeforstreets Just wait until cash is eliminated... coming soon.
2
@chemical-or9 Reminds me of Edward de Bono's quip about native intelligence being "hardware" and one's ability to use thinking skills being "software" that will direct the use of hardware capabilities.
2
yes, well at least we know that the A.I. won't have an "emotional truth" that we need to take into account - or will it? A.I. "having its own agenda" in a way is an "emotional truth," isn't it? Our whole concept of "truth" has being challenged for some time! The way people react en masse is a brand of truth that is culturally variable, but very real =- as you imply.
2
@noeldeal8087 It doesn't work to profess you know The Truth on the basis that it's fact Because of Confirmation Bias, people won't believe YOU - no matter what you say or show your EDU and qualifications are. My point is that, for instance, let's say many people mistakenly assume "that snake could be poisonous," (when only one or two specific species are.) This mistaken fear and lack of knowledge about snakes means a very real consequence for how another rat-killing, non-poisonous snake is treated. So because "Everyone knows some snakes are dangerous," this means that a non-poisonous snake will be treated unfairly from the incompetence of no ability to identify if this particular snake is, in fact, a poisonous species or not.
2
Now let's hear HOW people can "know the difference."
2
All flip phones have hardware wifi triangulation that cannot be turned off. Best to get a degoogled phone that doesn't "phone home."
1
Perhaps you need to put into action some of the pointers that this channel can teach you?? It's Google that is doing this to you - not this channel.
1
@noeldeal8087 Yes. Really, what's the difference between a "prejudice" and an "intuitive hunch"? Also, we are also being surveilled and strangely categorized by our online actions. Your example has some logical holes though; many Good Reasons for serious objections about Police involvement with the people whom they're supposed to be "Serving." There's essentially no way to make specific police responsible for their actions. For instance, Relations with police departments would improve if Civil Asset Forfeiture (essentially Police highway robbery) was made illegal: https://youtu.be/gpL7T6mBEiY?si=T9XX6hYDADwCPcEF But I guess this issue will cease circumstantially when the ability to do any business in cash is supposedly being eliminated by next Jan.'24.
1
@dreed7312 Rob's solutions aren't a "one size fits all." His content is a web of education that will be based on your own needs to design your own solutions - many of which involve changing your online behavior. How and why the tech works the way it does is an indispensable factor (that changes fast) and cannot be covered in one video, no matter how "organized." So Rob's advice is directly related to your willingness to learn new ways.
1
Rob has been able to predict what's coming before it shows up in multiple situations. Then he has helped us to be ready for it, unlike everyone else who must merely react after it happens.
1
@HostileRespite Plus, instead of so many who only ring the Watchman's Rattle as you pointed out, Rob is different because he has solutions helping us craft an entire privacy strategy. Granted, these solutions require learning stuff - they aren't easy because so many resist learning.
1
Come to Rob Braxman's social networking site: Brax.me Only requires a password and username to join, no email or phone number necessary!
1
Rob's entire channel is involved in his replies...
1
but you'd better have your revocation notarized and present it to the "proper" people in the "proper legal" ways. Seriously, you can say anything you want - but revocation is trickier.
1