Youtube comments of Misty Culous (@mistyculous9644).
-
168
-
24
-
@ZionSairin You must take what you did further to get more than "nothing." Art EDU gives the wrong impression that being an artist with their work sold by a gallery is the only way to succeed as an artist. As a gallery artist, this piece would represent a collection of perhaps twenty pieces similar to it. If you have that many, then you can photograph them and go to a gallery and the gallery will sell them all to you and ask for more - especially recently large non-representational abstract artwork is in demand.
The inspired creation of the art itself is only perhaps 25% of the art "business." (As is being an awesome composer is only 20% of the success of being a musician - who have an even harder time succeeding than artists!)
One of the cool things about being ADHD multi-talented is you can shape your raw talents to amplify your preferred activities within your own business design.
Some of these "business designs" of how to make a living off of what you make are codified - like a franchise. But perhaps the one you prefer isn't, so you need to design it yourself. You must strategically get a benefit from your art, which will be just as creative as the art itself.
For instance, someone I know loves the subject of animals - She house-sits and her house-sitters pay her not only for house-sitting but also they buy a portrait of all their pets that she paints for them - she gets a paid place to live AND paid for her art!
A drawing can be the first part of many forms. Now that you have this drawing, you can sell it to someone else as a plan for a larger work. Consider it the awesome plan for a much larger work - expand it and make it into a 3D sculpture, a mural on a building, etc. This way the drawing becomes a sales presentation for you to get a huge bunch of $$ upfront, half on completion.
It could become a personalized greeting card, a "big business card" that makes you memorable to others.
Anyway - now that you've made something you know is valuable - run with it!
20
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
12
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
OK, why do lawyers say: Don't talk to authorities without a lawyer present? Now imagine all the stuff you say when you imagine nobody is listening, but in fact, you are being recorded. Think of all the sarcastic, double meaning "funny" stuff you have said.
If you ever imagined meeting a really rich person and falling in love, they wouldn't have anything to do with you if you hadn't protected your privacy.
The way you click on Terms of Service without reading - you wouldn't ever realize it if you're doing things that are against the agreement!
Do you want your health insurers to have your health history and info about all of your possibly unhealthy habits such as how often you exercise, what you eat, the fat or sickly people you hang out with, etc.? How about your car insurance prices? Your landlord? The people who are about to loan you lots of money?
What if you, unknowingly, happen to know someone who knows a terrorist, a gang member, a mafia member? You don't know any of that, but you've been profiled and you won't be able to do anything about your status at the airport about it.
Would you like to be only shown things that cater to people who you've been type-cast with, when you're deliberately searching outside of your own 'caste?'
What if your next employer doesn't like something you said online expressing an opinion that is political and so doesn't hire you?
What if you're a writer or an activist and want to research things that you're never going to do but must know to do to create a story? Do you want it to be a matter of record that you were interested in "objectionable content?" But it's stuff that you need for your journalism or story writing...
Anyway, I'll stop this list, but perhaps you get the idea now why privacy is worth fighting for What do you think now?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, great author - (sometimes lousy translations.)
Many classic SciFi predictors could not be mentioned: Theodore Sturgeon, A.E. Van Vogt, Robert Heinlein, Phillip Jose Farmer, Rodger Zelazny, Alfred Bester, Ursula LeGuinn, Frederick Pohl, Ray Bradbury, Robert Silverberg, Niven & Pournelle, Philip K. Dick, David Brin, Poul Anderson, Jack Vance, Olaf Stapleton...and I could just go on for another three paragraphs...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
After reading "Language, Thought & Reality" by Whorf... It was the first book where I could understand the words, but it took me much study to wrap my head around its content.
Hopi verbs have TWO forms of their tense, named: "Objective" and "Subjective."
The 1st "Objective" verb category means: What people together can witness moment by moment. (So if you can see something behind your friend, you had to use the Subjective tense.)
What you personally perceive doesn't exist for everyone just because you perceive it - as "Reality" does in English.
2nd: The "subjective" verb form: Whoever listens will have to believe your report - despite what you say not existing for them.
With this "scientific objectivity," Hopi might seem like a serious language of physicists and mindfulness...But in everyday life, I heard that Hopi people often laughably tease each other by saying entertaining, wild stuff they supposedly verify is true for them.
If you wonder...how do "tenses" happen in Hopi?
Huge categories of verb modifiers - modifiers that Whorf said gave a unique sense of relative time - not "factual time."
Example: (as I understood the book) if you wanted to say: "Usually, I intend to run every morning for my strength, please join me," A Hopi literal word-for-word example translation with Hopi sentence structure would be: (subjective form:) I'm intending, I'm running, (then verb modified words:) daily, rhythmically, strongly, dawning and (still subjective form) we are running (verb modifier:) together.
For awhile I tried to use English words and re-order them the way I understood Hopi does - it really stretched my brain!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This quote from Godwin: "How did someone do what they did?" "What are you already training to do?"
hmmmm - Perhaps it would also help us all if we could focus on how perception, practice and training works - and what makes "directed practice" work faster and easier? Daniel Coyle's "Talent Code" work comes to mind, here's a synopsis of Coyle's book on practicing: https://thepowermoves.com/the-talent-code/ (Coyle also has a blog, but it's examples are mostly sports oriented. I did enjoy how Coyle made a differentiation between practice that has a "right way" with existing examples to emulate, as opposed to practice that develops original creative ability to improvise and respond to new situations, like comedy, skateboarding and invention.)
We need to be able to learn, unlearn, to calm our expectations with their alarms about unfamiliarity and learn again - during the course of our whole lives!
When Godwin mentioned different types of criticism, from the right people: Maybe we need to regard critical thinking as only the "black hat" of a whole thinking skill process ability that is learnable? (Maybe Edward de Bono's work is worth resurrecting? CORTthinking.com)
Also, I enjoyed how Godin is discussing about most of us don't get how important staying with the process is - we're myopic as a culture. Only some of us get benefits from cumulative practice. Even then, we compartmentalize things literally, ignore process and don't "get" the abstracted benefits of how we can apply what we learn in one field to another.
Without the ability to discover what makes any process valuable and apply new processes, as a culture and individually, we're never going to "wise up." Things are now changing too fast to get by on what we already "know," now matter how extensive our "knowledge" was.
It's crafting abstracted processes that have value because those processes can be repeated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Do you have a "favored" way of getting into a flow state??
These days as a trigger to get into flow I use Alexander Technique - it's a discipline about how you can respond to go into action with less effort. The mindfulness "practice" of A.T. gets us into a state of flow as a by-product - you can use your sharpened senses in any skill that you'd like to better.
The longest period I've inhabited a state of flow was once for four straight days. I was an adolescent and went to classes, I did everything in this altered state of consciousness. I had learned that what made it come to an end was heavy-handed analysis or pondering something from my past or trying to second-guess what someone thought about what I was doing. As long as I imagined myself as a witness and continued to make the observations of the present now, the state continued.
I was really interested in these "triggers" that were outlined, thanks! My triggers had nothing to do with physical challenges. Although when in a state of flow once I was able to run indefinitely without getting tired in scorching heat - for the pure joy of it. Fortunately, some people had their sprinklers on, LOL.
My triggers for entering into a state of flow was to first interrupt and suspend my internal dialog as a discipline. My goal was to stop narrating and talking to myself for as long a time as possible. However long I could stop it - then I'd become aware and completely absorbed in my environment.
For me, what happened next was an appreciation of beauty. Natural beauty, the beauty of people and how they move, how they're shaped, their voices, guessing intention without imagining anyone was doing something nefarious. I could look at cars or buildings with curiosity about what someone's intention was when they made it the way they designed it.
I guess this means my biggest means of access to flow - for me it's the category of awe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm looking back over my life in retrospect. This description in this video fit me well. I thought of being "genius material" as a disadvantage in school. It was having to writhe in agony while the rest of the class repeated endlessly what I had already learned. By the first three weeks of school, I had learned the entire year of lessons - just by reading all the textbooks.
I'd like to relate my solutions, because a description of the problems here are only beginnings.
For me, rather than being a specialist, I had to recognize that I was innately a "generalist." Meaning - I was someone with many talents and interests that could not be satisfied by an "umbrella" solution that integrated many of these diverse interests. Some essential talent I had was always left out. Like a gremlin, a left-out talent would swamp me, demanding center stage at an inconvenient time.
I learned, rather than being a "diver-specialist," it was better for me to have a "learn & teach" as a purpose. Or, it worked for me to "learn & make up a biz with what I learned for awhile to fund my efforts as I learned more." My "smarts" were then focused on how to pull off doing what I wanted to do. Mostly I did this by going in the 'back door" rather than the "front door" of the livelihood. (Because I had no financial support, other than one four-year college scholarship.)
Some solutions that worked the best for me throughout my life:
First off, studying thinking as a skill specifically, (via Edward de Bono.) De Bono gave me strategic design skills that were useful my entire life - and still are, (now that I'm older.)
Then I studied how to get benefits from practice & mastery - from Aikido. Something I did NOT know how to do because I resisted establishing routines...because I assumed I didn't need to practice because I was so smart...(!) I later learned, "he who practices, improves." I thought I only needed an "epiphany" & that insight was everything. Epiphanies are a glimpse, then you have to learn as everyone else does - because brains can only take in so much unfamiliarity at a time.
Then, studying communication skills. One of the problems for "genius" level people is they "get it" so quickly, they have no idea how others can understand what they merely "get." So geniuses have lots of trouble to explain their processes and innovations to others. Communication ability is necessary to convince others to invest in my ideas, models or solutions or to hire what I have to offer. What was most useful to me was to study dialogue skills - Nowadays I'd use "World Cafe`" as a model. Maybe "leadership" or just plain "speaking skills." At the time, I also started studying a physical discipline that nobody had ever wanted to explain in words - and I had to work at it. Try explaining dance moves - it was that tricky. I got to be on the leading edge of that discipline for a bit.
My best move was to adopt a series of mentors. (Actually, I'm still working on a book about how to find and cultivate a mentor - and how to attract apprentices if you'd like to pass on your experience.)
There were a number of advantages to the mentor/apprentice relationship. Whenever I got interested in some field of study or business or a skill - I'd find someone who I considered to be the "best" in it - and I'd get as close to them as possible and act like a sponge. If not them personally, then the people who were closest to them - who were people who often had more time to pay attention to my endless questions. I tried to make myself useful to my mentors - and it usually worked.
Until I trained at my third livelihood and dropped it, I didn't realize how the learning of something itself was valuable to me. I often didn't enjoy having finished learning and now had to "set up shop" to actually do it because it became "just a routine" at that point - and the usual model so often didn't fit my other needs of lifestyle or associates. Adopting mentors helped me get a whole picture of what I was really getting into before I went through the sometimes expensive training to do so.
One of my mentors was Barbara Sher - author of a series of books on doing what you love. Sher made me realize that there were some activities I enjoyed much more than others, that weren't connected to academia or other subjects. (She wrote some amazing books with useful exercises for discovery.) These insights of what I loved doing became categories - "touch-stones" for my supposed "divergent" interests. Once I figured what my interests had in common, then their differences didn't seem all that unrelated. I had a new sense of purpose instead of random dilettantism.
And, off I went into an ever-more-interesting mix of lifestyles, skills, environments and people that was entirely much more gratifying than anything I was ever exposed to in school.
Anyway - hope you got something useful from my story of my life experience.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ask yourself - how is the interruption functioning?
Interrupting can be meant as a reinforcement, an agreement with what you're saying. For instance, the SoCAL culture interrupts this way.
Plus - pretty much anyone can understand more than one person talking at a time. (Which is a reason to just continue talking if you are being interrupted.)
Many people interrupt because they believe if they don't say what just occurred to them, they will forget it. So their interrupting is an emergency preservation of creative capacity! ((I've "labeled" this, making people feel understood, so they'll interrupt like this more humorously - I always want "funny" interruptions!)
Sometimes interruption is a problem with them not getting an indicator that they're being understood. So the person keeps repeating themselves in different ways, as a teacher would, because they think others aren't giving them the "right" kind of "I got it" acknowledgement.
Interrupting also has a function to advance the conversation. It's used as a way to indicate to the people you know well, "I've heard that story already, let's skip the rest and get to the point." Or, "Don't go into that old story I've already heard because it's just going to distract from the point of the current topic, which is..."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1