Comments by "C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d" (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE) on "Ukraine Launches MASSIVE Drone Attack On Moscow; MAJOR Airport DAMAGED | Breaking News With Enforcer" video.

  1. Does that mean 14 of them hit targets of importance?
    1
  2. ​ @flouisbailey  Unfortunately, the last one we had, allowed way too much to go on, withholding aid over a personal vendetta (aka childish reasons). I'm just glad he wasn't around for this invasion, otherwise Ukraine would've been steamrolled 😞 (hell, he probably would've tried to ASSIST in said steamrolling) I'm just glad this administration had enough foresight to sign us up for 8 years of guaranteed aid to Ukraine, just incase Mr. 👌🍊👌 did end up being reelected. But you're not wrong... FAR too little has been done! We should've had troops helping with frontline defense since June of 2022, as it's the least we could do to make up for letting Puddin Pants get away with the various shit he's started over the last two decades... all of which inflated his ego and made him feel like he could do WHATEVER he wanted (because let's face it, we let him). But more specifically, for us pledging our support to help protect their sovereignty in exchange for giving up their nukes (Budapest Memorandum), and then letting all the crap happen over there! Which you know the only reason the US and UK were signers of it was solely as an assurance that the other signer, Russia, would keep to THEIR word... because oh look, they didn't! Still... Even IF most of what's gone on in Ukraine since becoming a sovereign country was related to internal corruption and thereby nothing we could get involved with (as per the Memorandum), Crimea should NEVER have gotten to the point of annexation. 😒 Our complacency was, and continues to be, completely inexcusable... 😮‍💨 (I'm almost positive the automoderation system will strike this comment down, since I've used trigger words AND it's "strongly worded"... but maybe not 🤷‍♂️🤞)
    1
  3. That must mean 14 hit targets of importance, or, that they were too publicly visible, and that they had to make a statement for one reason or another? (This comment, but slightly different, was automoderated into oblivion, but a question variant of mine WAS allowed, so I'm testing something here as I'm curious if I've found a way around YT's shenanigans... As such, please ignore this 😊)
    1
  4. Seems that a simple question mark MAY be enough of a deception, that the automoderation system no longer perceives it as an opinion or a snarky comment, and will allow what otherwise wouldn't have been! More tests will need to be conducted over the next few days/weeks, and on the various other channels I'm routinely silenced on.
    1