Comments by "C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d" (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE) on "" video.

  1. LRASM #1: "I will take out ID:24; you take out ID:44" LRASM #2: "Roger Roger" 😊 At least that's how I hope their 'confirmation' response is programed as...
    93
  2. Since a ship's hull is vastly thicker than a shipping container, and that these won't be used against shipping containers (except maybe a container ship that's a weapons runner)... I'm not sure I can buy into what you're saying. Plus, even an armchair idiot like me would design them with the entire radar being IN FRONT on the hardened penetrator cone. The radome doesn't need to survive once it has started to impact, only the rest of the payload does. But, as I said, I'm an "armchair idiot" and I'm likely missing something! 😅 edit: And the next scene was what definitely looked like it was the formed nose cone of the LRASM! So I've indeed ate my words! lol I'm perfectly content to leave my error, though, and won't remove this comment.
    15
  3. [Boy, YT sure failed me... I didn't get any of these notifications lol]  @buildmotosykletist1987  Yes! that's exactly why I figured it could legitimately be possible 😁 Having perused a number of repositories on GitHub has presented plenty of funny code comments!
    1