Comments by "C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d" (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE) on "" video.

  1. Well YT removed this earlier, for god knows what reason... But depending on the source, Mako=46MPH and Salmon Shark=50MPH I had always known the Salmon Shark to be the crown holder due to it being uniquely warm blooded.
    9
  2.  @teddy.d174  YT has it in for me these last 8mo+, which doesn't help. I think it's because I mentioned the 3 letter educational and governmental internet domains that these numbers came from, along with the name of a non-institution site that additional conflicting data came from. But yea, their automoderation algorithm's sensitivity is dialed up WAY too high 😮‍💨 It's so bad that I've stopped commenting, as I don't know when or where it'll decide to strike. 😕
    4
  3. He's mentioned it in a few videos, but perhaps there's not much info available and that's why he's held off on doing a standalone video?
    2
  4.  @teddy.d174  Yea, same. Links are pretty much off limits even when not "on a list" lol Although when not in a list, you can usually link to other YouTube videos (I had success with that), and the CDC or Whitehouse pages. But yea, I've learned not to bother. I've also gotten a pretty good bead on what I can say without incurring is wrath... But, then there's times like this where it surprises me...
    2
  5. Mako Shark: up to 46MPH Salmon Shark: up to 50MPH Although, those are from EDU or GOV websites. Whereas the site "SharkSider" states 60MPH for the Mako... So 🤷‍♂️ Previous to looking right now, I was under the impression it was the Salmon Shark as the fastest, thanks in part to being uniquely warm blooded.
    1
  6.  @MikeJones-mf2fw  Well, the removals clearly aren't by a human, as no one can read them that fast (they are gone in under 30sec). I also am quite certain they aren't reviewed by one, either, as there have been removed comments which were not related to anything going on in the world... Granted, most that get removed HAVE indeed been in relation to the war that started in February, two years ago. (which I'm pretty sure a certain country's troll farm workers are who flagged me in the first place, as I didn't have this issue until more recently) But yea, it's infuriating, to put it mildly. Politically, I'm aligned with the opposite party than what I'm sure 90% here are aligned with... heh I only mention that so that you can tell others that the Elephants aren't the only ones this happens to. 🥴
    1
  7.  @teddy.d174  Yea, there's loads of us, which is how I know that for many of us it's due to being likely reported by said trolls, as everyone I've encountered with this issue have been people commenting on various independent news channels (giving daily/weekly updates on the conflict) and we all show/express support for 💙💛. My suspicion is that they flag our comments, but that they don't get reviewed by humans due to the sheer volume. That is left to their automated system to deal with. We don't get put in actual "YT jail" (which one person said she has been a few times now), but it can't just "do nothing" and so it takes action by simply hiding our comments (they're technically not deleted, they're still in our comment history; accessible via Settings > Your Data in YouTube > Comments}. This is what some people call being "Shadow 🩹" – that's a ....-aid 😉 as to invoke what I'm talking about lol But yea, further proof that they're only hidden is that you still get reply alerts to the comment threads where yours was removed, because it's not really gone, just invisible to everyone. It's also why you can still navigate to the specific comment through the aforementioned comment history, as that gives your a direct link to that comment. Basically it's set to "not public", in the same way a video can be set to not be public, but you can still share the link to it and people can watch it that way. Wouldn't surprise me if there's even a Reddit support group for all of us... 🥴
    1
  8.  @NinjaRunningWild  Yes, I had seen that and mentioned it in my original reply that YT deleted. I discarded it because my sources were EDU and GOV sites, which I figure were more reliable.
    1
  9. re: Expanding the terminology... Term it as a Hypersonic Interceptor Missile? 🤷‍♂️
    1