Comments by "C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d" (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE) on "" video.

I see Scott replied to another thread (younger than this one) and classified that he had indeed intended to say 2033. On the plus side, at least we know Scott is still human! (or that his AI model has mastered its "to err is human" subroutine...)
3
If you mean by helicopter, I believe that was abandoned over a year ago, after issues during the first or second attempt.
3
You forgot to include a timestamp, or at least some context, so that folks know what exactly you're talking about. I was thinking you might've commented this on the wrong video, but then you mentioned SpaceX 😅
1
With the Ru economy diving, I'm genuinely left wondering how much longer they'll keep up with their end of things for the ISS 😒 I also can't deny that there's a little voice in my head wondering if these capsule ""problems"" will become more frequent and more severe... not actually due to negligence, but intentionally with the official word obviously not being that, strictly to give them an "out" due to things ""outside if their control"". I'm expecting they'll say something like: "Sorry, we can't keep up our end of things due to reliability issues. We are investigating the causes and will resume as soon as possible." Of course, that "ASAP" will coincidentally be after the ISS runs out of something important that only the Ru side can provide. (I know Scott has mentioned how is the Ru side that provides power AND station keeping, but the latter is something we technically have become able to do)
1